Summary Of A Compensatory Response To The Problem Of Evil Beaty
Beaty, Michael Douglas. “A Compensatory Response to the Problem of Evil: Revisited.”
Religions, vol. 14, no. 1, Jan. 2023, p. 35. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14010035
Beaty argues that the problem of evil can be solved by appealing to the concept of compensatory providence. He argues that God compensates for the evil that people suffer in this life by giving them rewards in the afterlife. Beaty's argument is based on the idea that God is just and merciful, and that he would not allow his creatures to suffer without compensating them in some way. Beaty's argument is creative and thought-provoking. He provides a new way of thinking about the problem of evil, and he offers a possible solution that is both plausible and consistent with traditional Christian beliefs. However, Beaty's argument is also controversial. Some people may argue that it is not fair for God to compensate for evil in the afterlife, when the people who suffer have already experienced the evil in this life.
Effingham, Nikk. “Using Wormholes to Solve the Problem of Evil.” TheoLogica, vol. 5, no. 1,
Jan. 2021, pp.
…show more content…
He argues that if God is perfectly moral, then he must always act in accordance with the moral law, even if this means causing suffering. However, if God is perfectly loving, then he must always act in the best interests of his creation, even if this means breaking the moral law. Rutledge concludes that we must choose between a God who is perfectly moral and a God who is perfectly loving. Rutledge's argument is thought-provoking and challenging. He raises important questions about the nature of God and the relationship between morality and love. However, his argument is also controversial. Some people may argue that it is possible for God to be both perfectly moral and perfectly loving, even if this means that he sometimes has to act in ways that seem
Book Report On Night By Elie Wiesel
979 Words | 4 PagesIn addition, how can humans treat each other as though another human is just a bug that needs to be exterminated? Through the shocking stories, the reader also begins to question where God is; however, there needs to be a separation of blame. Human’s evil actions are not the responsibility of God. It must be recognized that humans have freewill to choose to do good or evil. Evil is of the world, but since God is not of the world, God is not responsible for the evil in the world.
Essay On Evil And Omnipotence By J. L. Mackie
826 Words | 4 Pages“Do you see this son, it’s all madness out there. I just don’t understand why God lets this happens.” As my mother watches the 11 pm news on a cold rainy night, most of the coverage is about evil acts and how it’s affecting the community of Los Angles. Thus, it raises the question of why a God who is omniscient, omnipotent, and benevolent would allow evil and suffering to exist in the world. This paper explores the argument of the problem of evil conflicts with the existence of God from two different points of view, criticism of one point of view, and evaluation of the argument.
How Does Peter Van Inwagen Respond To The Problem Of Evil
1706 Words | 7 PagesThe purpose of this essay is to explore Peter Van Inwagen’s take on Free Will, as well as how he uses it to respond to The Problem of Evil. It will also cover objections to his Free Will Defense and his responses to them as well as my own personal responses. The Problem of Evil is the age old argument that since there are so many horrendous evils and cruelties happening in the world, God cannot exist. This is because God is a morally perfect and omnipotent being, and because he is good, he could never allow the horrors of the world come into play.
Adams Arguments On The Deductive Problem Of Evil
643 Words | 3 PagesThe deductive problem of evil defines omnipotence as having no bounds to power and being all-good as having the will to prevent and stop any evil that one possibly can. Furthermore, Adams presents how much this problem is amplified when considering horrendous evils that would push the average person to “doubt the positive meaning of their lives”(Adams 300). Adams acknowledges that this definition of God’s qualities alongside the definition of horrendous evils hinders the existence of the Christian God. God is one who is supposed to hold love for all of his creations, but allowing for his creations to suffer needlessly doesn’t align with this love. This problem causes people to question not only God’s love for them but also God’s reasoning in their suffering and their living.
John Hick Problem Of Evil Essay
1397 Words | 6 PagesFor years, many have questioned G-d’s role when it comes to addressing the problem of evil. Why is it that bad things always happen to the best of people? Oftentimes, we find ourselves wondering how an all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-good divinity could allow for such atrocities to occur, such as the Holocaust and the enslavement of millions. G-d’s role and existence surrounding the problem of evil is most often debated by philosophers and theologians alike such as English philosopher, John Hick. Hick introduces a consoling outlook to why such atrocities exist, framing G-d’s role and reasoning for evil's existence as a way for us to learn, grow, and better our souls.
A Perfect Mess Analysis
1233 Words | 5 PagesThroughout Harper’s book and Kheiyn’s article, I found five main points that stood out to me in relating to helping me understand why bad things happen to good people. First, God did not create pain and suffering, man has through sin and defiance. Second, although suffering is not good, God uses it to achieve good. The third point tells us that the day will come where your misery will no longer exist and God will judge evil. The fourth states that our suffering does not even compare to what God has in store for his followers.
God's Problem By Bert Ehrman
459 Words | 2 PagesBert Ehrman's book "God's Problem" is a thought-provoking exploration of the problem of evil in the world. Ehrman asks the question of how an all-powerful and loving God can allow suffering and pain to exist in the world. The book is divided into several chapters, each examining a different aspect of the problem of evil. Ehrman begins by exploring the biblical accounts of suffering and how they have been interpreted throughout history. He then looks at various philosophical arguments for and against the existence of God in light of human suffering.
Summary Of Peter Berger's The Sacred Canopy
717 Words | 3 PagesThe use of God as a shield works on believers, but not on nonbelievers. The question “why bad things happening to good people” still cannot be answered for the nonbelievers, a common critique of religion itself. Regardless of the problem of theodicy, however, religion has worked really well to create and maintain the reality. Berger explains that it is because religion legitimates effectively. “Religion has been the historically most widespread and effective instrumentality of legitimation….
Argumentative Essay: The Problem Of Evil
877 Words | 4 PagesOn the other hand, theists like Swinburne, believe that evil is necessary for important reasons such as that it helps us grow and improve. In this paper I will argue that the theist is right, because the good of the evil in this specific case on problems beyond one’s control, outweighs the bad that comes from it. I will begin by stating the objection the anti-theodicist gives for why it is wrong that there is a problem of evil. (<--fix) Regarding passive evil not caused by human action, the anti-theodicist claims that there is an issue with a creator, God, allowing a world to exist where evil things happen, which are not caused by human beings (180-181).
Walter Sinnott-Armstrong's Argument Analysis
2349 Words | 10 PagesThe problem of evil takes into account three defining features of God: all-good, all-knowing, and all-powerful and questions whether such a God would permit evil and not interfere. Sinnott-Armstrong discusses his stance by countering responses he coins as the Glorious Response, the Modest Response, and the Overriding Response. Whereas, Craig counters the arguments made by Sinnott-Armstrong. The Glorious Response Thus response suggests evil is
Mackie's Evil And Omnipotence
933 Words | 4 PagesIn Mackie’s Fallacious Situation, there are four main points that are discussed. One of the points is “Good must exist with evil”. Another is that “Evil is necessary as a means to good”. Another one is that “The universe is better with some evil in it that it could be if there were no evil”, and lastly is “Evil is due to human freewill”. These ideas try to explore the co-existence of evil and good in the same
Old Testament Theology Of Hesed
2543 Words | 11 Pages(Dyrness 60/ Hummel 297). b. God’s unfailing and steadfast love for believers is not based upon their actions
Evaluating Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics
1495 Words | 6 PagesHe describes the objection as, “all men desire the apparent good, but have no control over the appearance, but the end appears to each man in a form answering to his character” (1114b). This view argues that all people pursue that which seems good, but some people cannot see the true good, which is out of their control. The immediate implication of this objection, if it is indeed true, suggests that “no one is responsible for his own evildoing” (1114b).
Why Does God Allow Suffering
967 Words | 4 PagesThe existential question of suffering has plagued humankind for millennia. Numerous philosophies and theologies have attempted to explain the reality of suffering in the world. Answers range from there being no meaning to suffering to those who see suffering as having redemptive value. The book of Job in the Bible recognizes God’s sovereignty and justice in the midst of suffering. For the Christian, the question of the question suffering becomes particularly difficult: why would God allow suffering?
Religious Faith In Jean Meslier's Testament
1139 Words | 5 PagesAnd yet, it escapes him that perhaps religious doctrines exist to serve subtle moral purposes, and that scientific fact is not their major concern. His opinions about religion epitomize all the myopia common to materialism and atheism. He forgets the profoundly inspirational qualities of faith; he ignores religion’s storehouse of literature, myth, and consoling rituals; and he entirely forgets the critical importance of religion in passing on a culture’s moral values. Had he understood the nature of man more deeply, he would have understood that only philosophers and saints can be induced to do good by appeals to reason alone; for the average man, only the fears of eternal damnation will keep his baser instincts in check.
More about Summary Of A Compensatory Response To The Problem Of Evil Beaty
Book Report On Night By Elie Wiesel
979 Words | 4 PagesEssay On Evil And Omnipotence By J. L. Mackie
826 Words | 4 PagesHow Does Peter Van Inwagen Respond To The Problem Of Evil
1706 Words | 7 PagesAdams Arguments On The Deductive Problem Of Evil
643 Words | 3 PagesJohn Hick Problem Of Evil Essay
1397 Words | 6 PagesA Perfect Mess Analysis
1233 Words | 5 PagesGod's Problem By Bert Ehrman
459 Words | 2 PagesSummary Of Peter Berger's The Sacred Canopy
717 Words | 3 PagesArgumentative Essay: The Problem Of Evil
877 Words | 4 PagesWalter Sinnott-Armstrong's Argument Analysis
2349 Words | 10 PagesMackie's Evil And Omnipotence
933 Words | 4 PagesOld Testament Theology Of Hesed
2543 Words | 11 PagesEvaluating Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics
1495 Words | 6 PagesWhy Does God Allow Suffering
967 Words | 4 PagesReligious Faith In Jean Meslier's Testament
1139 Words | 5 Pages