Summary Of A Petition To The President
“A Petition to the President”
In July of 1945, Leo Szilard and his fifty-nine cosigners created a petition for the President of the United States to ask him to refrain from using atomic bombs to attack the Japanese people in the phase of war. Szilard uses this appeal to help describe his reasoning on why he believes atomic bombs will do more harm than good for not only Japan, but for the entire world. He thought that by using nuclear bombs, a new era of destruction would occur, making the current war inferior. In Szilard’s essay, “A Petition to the President,” pathos, logos, and a positive tone are used to help sway his reader’s, which supports his argument and helps it become successful because it persuades the audience to believe that the use of atomic bombs is not necessary during the war.
Szilard creates a successful argument by using logos to apply logical reasoning for why his argument is true. One of his logical explanations on why he feels the need to hold off on the use of atomic material is because he believes that this will do more harm for not only the Japanese people but for us as well. Szilard states, “Our use of atomic bombs in this war
…show more content…
The tone helps hook the audience by making the reader feel emotions towards the Japanese. The use of emotions, feelings, and logic are what make the audience feel involved and considerate for Japan. The fact that Szilard had fifty-nine petitioners behind him also helps make this successful. By having cosigners who are knowledgeable with atomic power show the people that they are familiar about this topic and deserve to be heard. When it came to the success of the argument towards the President, it was an unsuccessful argument because the article was never submitted for him to read. It is unfortunate that this petition never reached the President of the United States because it had a very powerful and meaningful
Rhetorical Analysis Of The Winning Weapon? By Author Ward Wilson
609 Words | 3 PagesIn The Winning Weapon? : Rethinking Nuclear Weapons in Light of Hiroshima, author Ward Wilson attempts to make the argument that Japan did not surrender from WWII because of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima. But rather that the invasion of the Soviet Union was the deciding factor in their withdraw. He then uses this argument to indicate that our views on nuclear weapons, and how they affected Japan’s military decisions is incorrect. Wilson begins his argument looking at the Japanese’s military and political standing prior to the bombing of Hiroshima.
Leo Szilard's 'A Petition To The President Of The United States'
832 Words | 4 PagesSzilard shows the seriousness of the situation in his closing statement, the United States “may have to bear the responsibility of opening the door to an era of devastation on an unimaginable scale” (Szilard). Showing that the responsibility will have to be carried by the Country if the President decides to use the bomb is another appeal to the emotion to ensure that the reader fully realizes the importance of the decision. With all of the support to the authors side, Szilard also shows the opposing side by acknowledging that there may be a point that the President will be forced to use the atomic bomb. By displaying both sides of the argument, the author shows that the petition is fairly portraying all the facts.
Leo Szilard Violations
564 Words | 3 PagesIn this essay, I will be explaining why I think Leo Szilard does a great job in providing an argument that should stop the use of atomic bombs.
Comparing J. Samuel Walker's Prompt And Utter Destruction
1869 Words | 8 PagesHowever, too much credit is given to that defense. One of the largest factors was a jingoistic pride spurred by racism, the Pearl Harbor attacks, and a presidential ego. In J. Samuel Walker’s book Prompt and Utter Destruction: Truman and the Use of Atomic Bombs against Japan, Americans of the time are said to have viewed the Japanese as “subhuman” and as “vermin” and “apes” (Walker 21). Even the White House released a statement that Japan had been “repaid many fold” with the bombs (Walker 76). While he was a product of the same society and time in America, Truman’s mirrored racism should not be overlooked.
Summary Of Petition To The President
804 Words | 4 PagesMichael Smith Professor Amy Decker English 102 19 May 2015 Critical Evaluation of “Petition to the President” Szilard makes a valid argument in his “Petition to the President” essay by using a good balance of logos, pathos, and ethos as well as by being sure to restate his point to assure that the reader makes the necessary connections. He used ethos very well when stating his reason for what makes him a reliable source to be talking on behalf of the topic. Logos were used well when Szilard was explaining how the use of atomic bombs would simply open a door to more destruction and turn them into an “easy fix” for any future problems with other countries that the U.S. may face. Although he did use logos and ethos as well as pathos, it appeared
The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb
743 Words | 3 PagesWhen looking at both Japan and America’s sides during the Pacific War, it is clear that President Truman should not have made the decision to drop the bomb. One of the many who disagreed with Truman’s decision, Admiral William E. Leahy, Truman’s Chief of Staff, expressed his thoughts on dropping the bomb in his memoirs, ‘I Was There’
Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay
676 Words | 3 PagesWas America right to use atomic weapons against Japan? The dropping of the atomic bomb in Japan at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, was the end of WWII. However, there has been much conflict considering the use of the bomb. In this essay, I will discuss reasons from both sides of the argument and justify my opinion.
Prompt And Utter Destruction Summary
1394 Words | 6 PagesWalker does not just take the reader on a tour of the decision-making process of President Truman and shows what made him to order the use of Atomic bombs on Japan, but he also provide an exploration of the historical situation that prompted the decision. He also examines the viewpoint of the Japanese, not only regarding the impact of the bombings on their ultimate decision to surrender, but also how their Allies called for an unconditional surrender. This call could possibly have led to the Japanese Emperor, Hirohito, being tried on counts of war crimes, which may have possibly made the Japanese to be reluctant on surrendering even in light of a crushing defeat (Huczko). Samuel Walker also provides useful insights into contribution made by the decision to use Atomic weapons on Japanese decision to surrender.
Szilard's Petition
677 Words | 3 PagesA Petition to the President of the United States by Leo Szilard and Cosigners was an appeal to the President (Commander-in-Chief) from the scientists who developed the atomic bomb, to consider other options instead of using it, in a surprise attack on Japan in 1945. The scientists lead by Szilard appealed to the President to first use the option of disclosing the power of the atomic bomb and requesting Japanese surrender, or if not heeded the atomic bomb would be used. A Petition to the chairman of the United States, the author of the petition discusses why the utilization of atomic bombs is not a good idea. Szilard’s drug ab aims his expertise and knowledge to abide valid points behind his petition. He is a working scientist in the eye socket
Why Was Hiroshima Justified
1840 Words | 8 Pagesthe bomb’s code name was “Little Boy”. Three days later, on August 9th, 1945, America dropped another bomb on Nagasaki with the code name “Fat Man”. As many as 200,000 deaths were caused by “Little Boy” alone and many people would die of radiation for years to come. The dropping of the Atom bomb on Hiroshima is an extremely debatable issue with no right or wrong answer. In this essay I will describe both sides to the argument then conclude using my final opinion on whether I am for or against the dropping of the bomb on Hiroshima.
Opposing Viewpoints Of Franklin D. Roosevelt And Charles Lindbergh
744 Words | 3 PagesIn the 1940s, America was faced with a great decision, one that would affect not only the United States, but potentially the world. To enter war, or not to enter war? That was the question. Whether ‘tis more patriotic in the Americas to “sacrifice…normal interests in life in order to insure the safety and the welfare of [America]” or to take arms against a world of troubles, and by opposing end them (Lindbergh, and a little Shakespeare). Franklin D. Roosevelt and Charles Lindbergh represented the two sides of this argument: one strongly favored war while the other thought it would cause turmoil.
Rhetorical Analysis Of Truman's Announcement Of The Atomic Bomb
630 Words | 3 PagesImagine living in a period in which the realities of war encased the world, and the lethal potential to end all suffering was up to a single being. During World War II, tensions between Japan and the United States increased. Despite pleas from US President, Harry Truman, for Japan to surrender, the Japanese were intent on continuing the fight. As a result, Truman ordered the atomic bomb, a deadly revolution in nuclear science, to be dropped on the towns of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. President Harry Truman, in his speech, “Announcement of the Dropping of the Atomic Bomb,” supports his claim that the dropping of the A-bomb shortened the war, saved lives, and got revenge by appealing to American anger by mentioning traumatic historical events and
Atomic Bomb Justified Dbq
882 Words | 4 PagesThis image shows how big of a threat and danger Japan is- it also shows how important it is to bring Japan down. The atomic bombs are justified because of Japan’s aggressions towards U.S. The United States’ use of atomic bombs on Japan is justifiable because it saved thousands of American lives; the Japanese were given fair warning, and their aggressions towards the U.S.
Albert Einstein Peace In The Atomic Era Rhetorical Analysis
737 Words | 3 PagesRhetorical Analysis of “Peace in the Atomic Era” The military gives people a sense of protection, which is important, but how much is too much? On February 19, 1950, Albert Einstein gave a speech at Princeton University titled “Peace in the Atomic Era”. In the speech he was discussing his opinion on what he stated was the “most important political question”. He constructed a well argument which persuaded his audience that security through ordnance isn’t a way to achieve peace throughout the nations, but collaboration is. In his speech Einstein used multiple persuasive techniques to support his argument, such as logos, pathos, and rhetorical questions.
More about Summary Of A Petition To The President
Rhetorical Analysis Of The Winning Weapon? By Author Ward Wilson
609 Words | 3 PagesLeo Szilard's 'A Petition To The President Of The United States'
832 Words | 4 PagesSummary Of We Need To Drop The Bomb By Dennis Kuncinich
1261 Words | 6 PagesLeo Szilard Violations
564 Words | 3 PagesComparing J. Samuel Walker's Prompt And Utter Destruction
1869 Words | 8 PagesSummary Of Petition To The President
804 Words | 4 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb
743 Words | 3 PagesAtomic Bomb Dbq Essay
676 Words | 3 PagesPrompt And Utter Destruction Summary
1394 Words | 6 PagesSzilard's Petition
677 Words | 3 PagesWhy Was Hiroshima Justified
1840 Words | 8 PagesOpposing Viewpoints Of Franklin D. Roosevelt And Charles Lindbergh
744 Words | 3 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of Truman's Announcement Of The Atomic Bomb
630 Words | 3 PagesAtomic Bomb Justified Dbq
882 Words | 4 PagesAlbert Einstein Peace In The Atomic Era Rhetorical Analysis
737 Words | 3 Pages