It’s the duty of subjects from a particular niche to abide by the rules put in place by authority. Laws that are implemented in a proper manner maintain order and organization of the community. The main objectives as to why people obey the laws are to avoid the consequences that come along with breaking the laws, benefit from the course of obeying the law, and the fact that the authority is powerful and at the same time it complies with the law set in place.
Laws that require individuals to commit grossly immoral actions can be described as brutal and cannot be justified. From my perspective, it’s a gesture of cruelty to enforce such laws because they go against human rights. An individual would only abide by laws that force them to pursue
…show more content…
The same argument applies to the disobedience to the authority. He further explains how the two actions; obedience and disobedience are either valuable or disadvantageous to humankind. Fromm argues that “human history began with an act of disobedience, and that it is not unlikely that it will be terminated by an act of obedience” (Fromm, p246). He adds that the two issues have both supported and created difficulties for an individual’s development. Although Fromm uses religious and mythological facts to showcase this, his work in the book demonstrates the historical injustices brought about by dictatorship and sadism. The piece mainly elaborates on the ways disobedience helps people. Fromm does state that noncompliance with the authority is not always favorable, but for the most part of his article Fromm takes into account ways disobedience has really added to the progress of the human …show more content…
Most of the leaders in this kind of circumstance are usually inexperienced and lack the moral values that someone under the same capacity is supposed to have. As a result they end up subjecting people in situations that betray the moral values and customs of society. The authorities in most cases undermine human rights and in extreme cases, they involve civilians in extrajudicial killings. Sadism encourages soldier to use rape as a weapon of war against civilians. Other areas where there is superficial training of leaders result molestation of women and
The passage from Civil Obedience was express with rhetorical and stylistic devices throughout his essay. The author opinion of government is the mode which only the people have chosent to execute their will. Throughout this essay this essay explains the refusal to obey certain laws. The tone of the author seems determined.
This means that most people will run with the crowd and just agree with others’ opinions just so that they do not stick out. In another paragraph of Fromm’s argument, he compares the “Original sin” of disobedience toas “the beginning of history”. After explaining his point of sin beginning the word we know today, he then says, “If the capacity for disobedience constituted the beginning of human history,
INTRODUCTION: Open your argument to the audience and give them reason to listen on. I. Hook (Opening Statement): Get your audience’s attention! Consider a quote from the story. Are there any circumstances in which the law should be ignored?
The conflict between authority and disobedience has stayed relevant since Adam and Eve chose to disobey in the Garden of Eden. Since this moment, every civilization has dealt with this relationship. Egyptians faced the exodus of their Israelite slaves from their land, Romans fought with the slave Spartacus who raised an army to fight against the Roman empire, and in the eighteenth century, the French government had the challenge of its civilians revolting against their authority. The balance between authority and disobedience represents a pendulum relationship. When a pendulum swings to one side, it eventually swings to the opposite side with an equal amount of force; thus, the more authority executes its rights on a civilian, the more the
Rebellions can drive people out and can lead to many other people dying for not cause at all and to be shown with no improvement in our social progress as a whole. In conclusion, Oscar argues that disobedience is a valuable human trait and that it promotes social progress and also how rebellion and disobedience can lead to positive changes in the economical and social viewpoint. It can help learn from history and help us expand our way of mind and people can learn a few new things from it also. It many lead down a pathway in which it improves lives as well our society for positive changes and help us unite with other people to fight what in we believe
The law may sometimes be “inconsiderate” but it keeps us in order. We may sometimes say it is harsh but it is because we are used to be “free” in a way that we do not follow rules and order. These things happen to us because we are not led by a good public official. Even the officials do not follow the law because they think they are an exemption which is not. We cannot remove the law.
If Adam and Eve had not committed that first act of disobedience, then man as we know him today would not exist. When people are acting disobediently, they are able to rely on their own powers and become fully human. Therefore, Fromm means that disobedience is the first step into independence and freedom because an individual is breaking away from what is right and is acting in ways that he feels are appropriate. By saying that history began with an act of disobedience and will likely end with an act of
These reasons will prevent anarchy because one has a conscience to determine which laws to follow and which ones do not; therefore, one shows loyalty to the authority of law and also loyalty to one’s
“You must be the change you wish to see in the world” These astonishing words that Mahatma Gandhi said made me suppose that Civil Disobedience is a Moral Responsibility of a citizen because when breaking certain laws, a citizen perhaps incorporate a good intention or a bad intention for breaking it. Citizens break the law occasionally to have their beliefs be heard so change can be assemble. Some ways that Civil Disobedience can be a Moral Responsibility would be breaking the law for the right intentions. An example of breaking the law for the right intentions could be The Salt March that Gandhi Created or, Rosa Parks standing up for her beliefs about her actions, MLK wanting equal rights with caucasian. Illegal Immigrants coming into the
I believe that a democracy can definitely survive when people choose which laws they follow and which laws they will break, as long as it is for the purpose of liberty. Although the term civil disobedience is more frequently associated with the Civil Rights Movement, and with activists such as Martin Luther King Jr., civil disobedience has been a recurring theme throughout most of American history. An early example would be the Boston Tea Party. During the pre-Revolutionary War Era, many Americans were discontent with the fact that they had to pay taxes to Great Britain, despite having no representation in their Parliament. This “taxation without representation” would inevitably lead to the Boston Tea Party, where a large group of men boarded
Dalrymple’s purpose for writing this article was to state that there should be a distinct balance between obedience and disobedience in civilization.
Law is a set of rules as to how people belonging to a certain land/country should behave. These rules determine how a person should be treated and punished if he/she commits a crime. The fear of going against the law is what keeps everyone from being vigilantes or criminals; it’s the reason as to why you can feel safe to walk with your purse in public. The law protects every citizen but the law has to also be followed or you will face prosecution. Law is the mainframe of human rights as explained in the paragraph below.
One question most people ask is, why should I obey the law? The most obvious reason is to avoid punishment, because most people are afraid of the consequences that come with disobeying the law. However, is there a moral obligation to do what the law says just because the law requires it? A discussion on what it means to be politically obligated, civil disobedience, when it’s ever justified to not obey the law and theories by philosophers will be presented. During the first 10 years of our lives, most of us were always taught to follow the rules, and listen to higher authority, otherwise we will face punishment, and as we went into our adolescent phase, we were still taught those fundamental principles, but it got to a point where following
Are we obligated to obey unjust laws? Laws are important because they are guidelines for a state. Without laws citizens would not know how to act and cause harm to others. Laws are aimed at common good and keep a society together and functioning.
What I will explain to you in this article will, how we are connected with the law and I hope, make you see sense in the importance of our laws in the society we live in. To be against the importance of laws in our society would show one to be ignorant and naïve. I encounter the law on a daily basis when I am driving. I have to follow the speed limit of each road, I have to signal before changing lanes, my vehicle must be in good condition in order to safely drive and I must obey all road signs as they are set in place to ensure the safety of everybody.