"Opinion: An AI takeover is not inevitable -- if we value creative work," the author argues in her article. According to Rebecca Ackerman, artificial intelligence (AI) technology has the ability to improve human creativity rather than putting the human race in peril. She uses instances of how AI-powered technology has been used to produce works of art, music, and literature to support her claim that it may boost human creativity. In Ackerman's thesis, the possibility for AI and people to work together is also underlined. We might embrace AI as a tool to help us improve our own skills rather than seeing it as a threat to human intelligence. For example, AI-driven technology can be used to generate concepts that people can then expand upon and …show more content…
She uses instances of tools powered by artificial intelligence (AI) that have been used to create works of literature, music, and art to support her argument that these technologies may boost human creativity. She also addresses different criticisms, such as the claim that eventually AI would outsmart people and take over the world. According to Ackerman, this is not a valid worry because AI is still very far from being able to perform any task that is even somewhat close to that. In a culture where automation and artificial intelligence (AI) are becoming more and more prevalent, Ackerman's thesis also emphasizes how important it is to respect creative work. As more and more jobs become automated, it is imperative that we recognize the worth of creative work and the unique contributions that humans may make in fields like art, music, and literature. This will ensure that these fields continue to grow and retain the distinctive human touch that makes them so wonderful. Overall, Ackerman's viewpoint presents a compelling argument for how AI might foster human invention. It is well-informed and compelling. She addresses any potential criticisms and provides evidence to support her assertions. Despite the worries surrounding AI, according to Ackerman, these risks can be minimized if we employ it
In conclusion, not only does she effectively contribute to the conversation regarding the decline of creativity and why it happens, but through her efficient usage of ethos, logos, pathos, and kairos, Manoush Zomorodi gives a thoroughly convincing presentation. Weaving these together creates a favorable argument for why taking time to set aside electronic devices boosts creativity. Overall, Zomorodi created a compelling argument that not only convinces her intended audience, but also those who may have initially disagreed with her.
However, Carr did not inform the readers his credentials and professional expertise throughout the essay. His profession is established at the end of the essay on a small footnote, which also provided his other essays and books. In the beginning of his essay, he establishes himself as a trustworthy source by discussing catastrophic events and providing small amounts of history. He also used quotes from historical figures such as the British mathematician and philosopher Alfred North Whitehead to make readers assume that he researched for his topic, which he did (90). Carr also provided opposing viewpoints by giving the reader’s quotes from theorists who are pro-automation and facts that prove humans can be “unreliable and inefficient” when they are responsible for operating simple tasks (93).
Everyone had access to life’s essentials so no one went without everyday necessities. In real life the main factor in threatening human creativity, ingenuity and survival is technology. People in the real world are becoming threatened by our technology. People aren’t as creative because they have less pain. Technology has made it so that people can do many things more easily, therefore since everything is available with a simple touch, there is not as much need to be creative, so there is not as much art.
Using this to continue to support her claim, Jonas asserts that “doctors, lawyers, and accountants are next in line.” The progression of artificial intelligence is not only allowing roots to obtain human attributes, but they are also being designed to analyze and make judgement. Later throughout her article, she creates a counterargument where she promulgates the fact that the advancement of these robots may takeover technical jobs but they will help form the development of more “creative fields.” Her switch of angle shows that she believes humans could now be free from laborious
It goes in depth about the benefits of AI, including the lack of having to pay for labor, and increased efficiency. This idea is developed by bringing up a real world scenario: when Ubering to downtown, an AI agent send an offer of triple the fare for the way back. (Garvey, 1) The author uses rhetorical questions to not only help the reader understand the purpose but hook the reader to continue reading the essay. The author uses good examples to help readers who are unfamiliar with AI understand.
Leonel Ramos Mrs.Harrell ENG 112 May 3, 2023 Final Exam Essay The articles “'Rise of the Machines' is Not a Likely Future” by Micheal Littman and the article “Is Google Making Us Stupid” by Nicholas Carr discuss the topics of the impact of technology. The articles discuss the same topic in a unique way but sway in view points. For example in the article “Rise of the Machines' is Not a Likely Future” Littman suggest that technology is not here to over take us and going to take over he suggest that AI is still in the work and has room to improve but we should use it to improve society.
We all have seen the movies that show AI eliminating the human race, and many people still have these fears. According to the article about neural networks, it states that many things even a few pixels can change what the software sees. The software thought the turtle model was a rifle in any orientation. Also in the Tesla crash it stated the network thought the white trailer was the sky. Not only do you have to worry about the mistakes that these networks make, you also have to worry about people trying to hack it for ill gains.
People tend to have mixed feelings about machinery. On one hand, machines are a fascinating source of power; but on the other, some speculate that machines will become too powerful, enough to take over humanity. This is most recently demonstrated by the fear of human-like AI replacing humanity because people see that this technology resembles humanity in its ability to think. Ironically, advances in technology are caused by human innovation, so if this power shift were to occur, it would be the result of our lust for power. This relationship between humanity and machinery is illustrated in Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley’s Frankenstein and Guy de Maupassant’s “A Railway Story”.
Nicholas Carr is “an American journalist and technology writer” who attended Dartmouth College and Harvard University. Over the past decade, Carr has examined and studied the different impacts that computers have on our life and the “social consequences” of this new technology (Carr 123). In “A Thing Like Me” by Nicholas Carr, the author claims that technology is overpowering and dominating our lives. Carr expands on this idea further by defining it as people using “tools that allow them to extend their abilities” (Carr 124). To help with his argument, Carr uses a historical narrative about the creation of computer software, named ELIZA.
Ken Robinson is the author of many books and a so called ‘creativity expert’. In 2006, he gave a speech for TED entitled ‘Do Schools Kill Creativity?’, which explores how the modern educational system discourages creative pursuits and demands high results from all students. Using slim to no statistics or formal studies, Robinson crafts his argument with stories and his own personal experience in the area of study. The entire speech is based on pathos but the audience interprets all of these stories as fact because of who is delivering the information to them.
This article fits with my research because it talks about the positive outcome artificial intelligence can have in the educational field. It is fairly simple to read and was helpful by proving the positive impact. It address the pros and cons about the educational AI that could be used to help students with courses they are having difficulties
Artificial Intelligence and its effect on the workforce Artificial intelligence(AI) is a recent reality of technological advancement affecting human society. To analyze its effect on the workforce we will look back in history for technological disruptions and how they affected the workforce and compare and contrast to the way AI is currently impacting and will continue impacting the human workforce and other aspects of human society such as economics, politics and the general environment. History Throughout history technological advancement has affected human society in its ways of living, working and its environment.
Rise of Artificial Intelligence and Ethics: Literature Review The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, authored by Nick Bostrom and Eliezer Yudkowsky, as a draft for the Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence, introduces five (5) topics of discussion in the realm of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and ethics, including, short term AI ethical issues, AI safety challenges, moral status of AI, how to conduct ethical assessment of AI, and super-intelligent Artificial Intelligence issues or, what happens when AI becomes much more intelligent than humans, but without ethical constraints? This topic of ethics and morality within AI is of particular interest for me as I will be working with machine learning, mathematical modeling, and computer simulations for my upcoming summer internship at the Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC) in Norco, California. After I complete my Master Degree in 2020 at Northeastern University, I will become a full time research engineer working at this navy laboratory. At the suggestion of my NSWC mentor, I have opted to concentrate my master’s degree in Computer Vision, Machine Learning, and Algorithm Development, technologies which are all strongly associated with AI. Nick Bostrom, one of the authors on this article, is Professor in the Faculty of Philosophy at Oxford University and the Director at the Future of Humanity Institute within the Oxford Martin School.
We have forgotten how business was conducted before conference calling and emails. Now, technology has taken over our lives and it clearly affects the creativity and communication between us. First of foremost, creativity plays a very important role in the improvement of our society and of our living standard. New innovations make our lives easier, allow us to do things that we could not do before, as well as create workplaces and bust the economy .Everywhere we look creativity and innovations are there; from an art gallery displaying Van Gogh 's masterpieces, to our mobile phones that provide us with information and functionality that previous generations could only dream of, to the way we shop using the internet and the new digital economy we live it.
I do not believe the field has been developed to its potential in any regard, and feel that considerable progress can be made to improve the interactive experience that users have with an artificial intelligence application. This genuine intrigue combined with my curiosity for the subject matter and the limitless potential of the field are the reason why I wish to pursue a greater depth of knowledge in artificial