The chapter that I want to write about is Chapter Eight: Wilma Derksen, “we have all done something dreadful in our lives, or have the urge to”. In this chapter I find the story line I quite interesting as it exemplified the current problem paced by society nowadays; crime. First of all, this chapter can be regarded as the chapter that tied most of the stories in the book including the undesirable difficulty, the inverted U-shaped concept and the principle of legitimacy. As I read the book, the topic discuss by Gladwell makes me think critically of the action taken by Mike Reynolds and Wilma Derksen. Both of them faced the same situation or what we like to called, difficulty, which is the death of their child. But what differ between them is …show more content…
In chapter seven, the author elaborates on the principle of legitimacy that tells us the authority also have to take part in creating a better society. Authority often assume that only society have to change their attitude towards other people and the law. I think people nowadays, especially places that have high crime rate, also belief this statement is true. The primary reason is they do not trust the justice system anymore. If we live in a society that often have unfair and predictable punishment for a crime, people will have negative perspective towards the authority- justice system. In the chapter, Mike Reynolds react to his daughter’s death by enforcing the Three Strikes system, but Wilma Derksen didn’t do anything and just forgive, these contrast reaction shows a big different towards the outcome of their action. In my opinion, the Three Strikes can be considered the effect after the peak in the inverted U-shaped graph. Forgiving, on the other hand, is the “less” version of the graph as it didn’t change the criminal to be a better person despite it didn’t have major aftereffect towards the crime system. Situation like this is ‘dependable situation’ where the people have to consider punishment depending on the criminal’s crime. Not every method is suitable for all crime and people have to start acknowledging it whether they are the higher-ups or citizen in a
He continues by mentioning that the laws being broken are the ones created to protect and nourish society. The author creates a concerned tone for minor laws being broken. Social order is broken when people break small laws because they are ruining
The first thing I would like to begin with in this essay is how blood was a major part. The reason it was so important in the book is that the blood symbolizes
ustice, fairness, and decency, abstract concepts that are innate in society and human nature. However, despite their near universal status in humanities mid, they often have different meanings for individuals. Aeschylus uses The Oresteia in order to explore these issues as characters in the play try to determine what it means to be just, what ought a just actor do, and what is the best model for achieving justice. The characters discuss ideas such as vengeance, reciprocity, balance, moderation, and finally the end result of the implied debate leads to a jury system. In this paper I will go over two of the several different interpretations of justice used in the Oresteia and compare and contrast them in order to demonstrate which is the best
There is also the problem of the sixth child that went missing and still has not returned. As the book goes on we learn more and we get deeper into the mystery that happened eleven years ago. The leaving reflects the main point of chapter 23 in How to Read Literature Like a Professor.
The traditional goals of sentencing are retribution, deterrence, incapacitation and rehabilitation (Stinchcomb, 2011). A more contemporary goal of criminal sanctions is restorative and community justice (Stinchcomb, 2011). Retribution is founded on the principle that offenders should receive their ‘just desserts’. However, the penalty must be proportionate to the offence committed (Welch, 2004, p.83) Deterrence aims to reduce criminal offending.
Some people are highly unsatisfied with the ending while others are content. However, no matter what your stance on the ending is, the novel forces readers to debate ethical
In both Crime and Punishment and Pride and Prejudice, the reader is afforded a glimpse of the darker side of human nature. Raskolnikov’s shocking coldblooded murder of Alyona Ivanovna, an elderly pawnbroker, and her sister Lizeveta, reflect a degree of brutality almost unimaginable in a human being. Likewise, Miss Caroline Bingley, while certainly not guilty of crimes as grievous or horrific as Raskolnikov’s, betrays a similar sentiment of heartlessness in her treatment of the Bennet sisters throughout the plot of Pride and Prejudice. However, the nature of each character’s cruel actions remain remarkably different. Raskolnikov seeks to transcend the ethical conventions binding society and act as a conscience-free moral agent, whereas Caroline Bingley’s behavior is very much a product of institutionalized classism, and she acts wholly within the parameters which Victorian England’s strict
In this essay the author Richard Wright constitute empathy in the reader against Bigger to avail dangerous state of Black Americans. This essay goes more in depth about how author uses to produce compassion which is hate and prejudice exhibited near Thomas in the act of a black criminal. Wright paints bright images in the minds of his readers with his practical styles that shows how social conditions influence someone’s life. Also In this essay Bigger does many bad things, the criminality of his character in Mary Daltons death is questionable for all the readers. The author is trying to say that all readers feel sympathy for Bigger because he has been forced into uncomfortable positions all night.
I have read Wilma Unlimited and Henry's Freedom Box. They both have the same theme,but different approaches to teach the theme. Both teach never to give up,but in different ways. I hope you agree with my opinion that the author did a great job on approaching the theme. These two books show similar ways of never giving up.
I am going to say something about differences between these
Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that states that the best action is the one that maximizes helpfulness. In this theory, punishment is warranted only if it promotes over-all happiness. C.S. Lewis refers to utilitarianism as humanitarian in his essay. Contrary to the general humanitarian viewpoint, which sees punishment as precautionary, Lewis believes that it denies criminals of their humanity. He states, "when we cease to consider what the criminal deserves and consider only what will cure him or deter others, we have tacitly removed him from the sphere of justice altogether; instead of a person, a subject of rights, we now have a mere object, a patient, a 'case."
Forgiveness is defined as “an action or process of forgiving or being forgiven” (Dictionary.com). Forgiveness is also described as “the resolute of overcoming anger and resentment that are naturally directed toward a person who has done one an unjustified and non-excused moral injury” (Murphy, J. G, p.15). According to the bible, when wrongdoers victimize individuals it is under the obligation of God to forgive: “for if you forgive other people when they sin against you, your heavenly Father will also forgive you. But if you do not forgive others of their sins, your father will not forgive you sins” (Matthew 6:14-15). Forgiveness is an important moral behavior that allows victims to discontinue emotions of anger, hate, and resentment towards a wrongdoer.
The central idea behind Jean Hampton's Moral Education Theory of Punishment (MET) is that it is best to educate criminals on their wrongdoings without handing down any physical punishments or ramifications. Hampton believes that excessive harm is not a moral response to a crime committed by a person. Rather, she argues that the point of basic punishment is to teach the wrongdoer that the action they did or wanted to do is forbidden, on the basis that it is morally wrong according to society. Therefore, according to Hampton, it is much healthier to educate criminals rather than handing down difficult physical punishments, which simply hurts the criminal and can be unproductive. To elaborate, Hampton proposes that any form of punishment is justified
Punishment is an infliction of a penalty that resulted from an offence. Punishment is also naturally justified when administered to those who deserve it. Retributivists claim that people who break the law deserve the punishment they get. Retributivism views punishment as a fair judgment and believe that the state should punish those who are found guilty of their wrongdoing because they deserve it. A person deserves the same treatment they inflict on others.
This essay will discuss crime as both a social problem and a sociological problem. Crime is seen as a typical function of society. Crime doesn’t happen without society. It is created and determined by the surrounding society. According to the CSO, the number of dangerous and negligent acts committed between the years of 2008 and 2012 rose from 238’000 in 2008 to 257’000 in 2012.