“Redcoats and Rebels”, by Christopher Hibbert is the story of the American Revolution through British eyes. Christopher Hibbert has written an assortment of historical text, and has influenced a lot of people throughout his writings, “Redcoats and Rebels”, being one of them. Most authors that write about the American Revolution put the point of view of an American, or American soldier. Hibbert wants to change the perspective of the entire war, not by favoring the British side, but telling the story like it is. It is fascinating to read the struggles and hardships of the “enemy”. We get a glimpse of the cockiness of the English and how they feel the war against the Americans is a given. The British believe the Americans don’t have a chance in winning a battle, let alone an entire war against a highly trained army. Hibbert’s overall goal in this novel is to show there is …show more content…
Yes it’s in the perspective of one of the British, but Hibbert does not leave out the Americans by any means. Both sides struggle throughout the war, a good example of this is the British being outnumbered in battle, “black troops [who] [were] expert marksmen…experienced in Indian fighting” (pg 102). The British were damaged with the defeat and the Americans took advantage of that by writing the Declaration of Independence. America realized “American colonies had [to] [have] their own permanent and separate government” (pg 115). Hibbert showed the doubt the British had of the Americans at first, but now with time, the Americans began to show their potential. The British were not just dealing with uneducated colonist, but were dealing with people hungry for freedom, people that would not stop at anything to achieve that freedom. Lastly the battle of Yorktown was the end of the war, leaving the rebels with the victory that no one saw coming. Most Americans did not believe they could win, but their love and desire for freedom defined the
Not only does the book highlight the positive reflection on the events of the American Revolution, but gives an overall unbiased insight of the happenings on through Martin eyes. Martin has been successful in portraying the truthful picture of the American Revolutionary War that includes the flawless character and moral perfection coupled with the problems and burdens that befell the army, and how they took it In the initial events of the book, Martin enters the war as a young boy who is anxious to protect his country and experiences noteworthy adventures along the way of his dream. He fights against the
The points the author made, he made well, in a way that you could clearly understand what he was saying, that is for the majority of the time. He was very organized in writing and in research. There are about 150 pages dedicated to references and such. Though the author made a wide variety of his points clearly there were several points that were harder to figure out what he was saying. Pages thirty through forty five speaks of the problem General Thomas Gage had with Americans, in reality the thesis of the chapter is, Gage’s plans to govern the new world with the King on his side and the resistant self-governed American colonists were making it difficult because of their customs.
Anna Wilson Ms. Keri Hamrick HIS 201 June 6, 2015 Review of 1776 1776 by David McCullough is published by Simon and Schuster. In 1776 David McCullough perfectly illustrates how the American army was always on the edge of defeat during the year of 1776. The story was limited to only one year with little background information; this causes confusion. Those who do not have a good understanding of the American Revolution will have an especially difficult time deciphering what the book is describing.
The book 1776 of David McCullough is very interesting history book. It took you back to the most relevant history time of American history of 1776. The book captures your attention with well-written narrative and format. The New york Times reviewed the book as “ the book is nonetheless a stirring and timely work, reminding us that it is soldiers rather than tavern patriots and windy politicians who have always paid the price of American idealism and determined successes” in 2005. David McCullough is a native Pennsylvanian.
In the text, Philbrick's selection of primary sources serve to develop his thesis into multiple authentic and surreal accounts of differing perspectives between loyalists and patriots. In his focus on primary sources, Philbrick knits together firsthand accounts from various Bostonian residents such as John Adams and John Andrews with events leading up to the war. For the most part, reading each journal and firsthand documentary is refreshing, but there are various points when Philbrick's reliance upon certain accounts prove to be unnecessary and exhaustive. He references to countless sources, and while most were significant, many appeared to have miniscule relevance to the main takeaway. For instances, Philbrick purposed John Andrew's narrative to aid readers in understanding the context of everything taking place in Boston during the 1700's, but most of the information referring to Andrew's personal accounts and the British's evacuation appears
“I never spent a thought about numbers; the Americans were invincible in my opinion. If anything affected me, it was a stronger desire to see them.” Continental Army soldier, Joseph Plum Martin shares his experience of the Revolutionary War through his book, Ordinary Courage. The bravery, courage, and patriotism expressed throughout the novel shows off Martin’s immense strength and perseverance. The soldiers fought through the trials of starvation, disease, lack of supplies, and vicious battles against the British troops.
He starts the book at the beginning of the war and works toward the close of the Revolution. This layout allows for Royster’s main themes to develop as the war is reaching its peak points. As the book develops these key themes begin to intertwine and their significance becomes clear. The reader begins to understand how the American ideals are tied to their relationship with the Continental Army. One of Royster’s key arguments is that the revolutionaries’ loyalty to the war was based on the national character.
The british were a force to reckon with, they were the top of the food chain, raining for one-hundred years, destroying powerful nations. A group of farmers, a brewer, and some people who wanted change didn’t seem like they would be any match to the British. A group of people fighting for a cause they believe in is stronger than people fighting for a king. The British brought their own demise by putting tighter and tighter control that led to a revolution in colonial America.
Britain, at the time, had the strongest army in the world. There was no way the untrained colonists could beat such a big
He talks about how the colonist had one advantage and that was a variety of territory. The American Revolution was not a conventional war, America just needed to protect the conflict, keep away from the enemy, rally for world support, and fight hard because they were so undersized compared to England. The conditions of Valley Forge were terrible. There were contagious diseases along with bad weather. Food supply was also terrible because the local farmers sold their food to British soldiers because they were more reliable about their money.
The term “Revolutionary” is an instantaneous change or shift that promotes equal rights, liberty, and freedom. So, while some may argue that the revolution was a turning point for America, The American revolution in this case is not revolutionary since slavery was still present, minority groups did not gain rights, and British ideals and tactics were still being used in the new government. One of the crucial pieces of evidence that this “revolution” could not be considered revolutionary is because of the slavery still taking place even after the war ended. Throughout the revolt against British rule in the 16th century, the American people fought under the banner of truth, justice, and liberty for all people, However, the only people that indeed
Gordon S. Wood, “the preeminent historian of the Revolution”, is a well known American historian who has received several awards such as the Pulitzer and Bancroft Prize for his historical books. In his book, The American Revolution: A History, he breaks down the key events based on his experiences and knowledge on the Revolutionary period. Wood was born in Concord, Massachusetts on November 27,1933. Wood teaches at many liberal renowned universities such as Brown, Cambridge, Northwestern , and Harvard. Now being eighty one years old, he recently retired from Brown University and lives in Providence, Rhode Island.
This story only focuses on the some facets of that night that how Revere alarmed everyone by shouting that” The British are coming”, and no one actually pay attention to the deep insight of this event night. Fischer by writing this book took the responsibility and explores the deep insight on the mythical event in American history. Fischer makes it very clear that Revere alarmed colonists that night but not by saying that “The British are coming” instead of word British Revere used Regulars, Redcoats, the King’s men or Ministerial troops. Because after independence tales began to recorded, and in 1775 the colonists still were considering themselves as British. Further Fischer reveals that how the alarm was passed by Revere in way that it passes through all the colonies and curved back to
In 1776, one of the most popular and well known founding fathers led the fight for independence in the royal colonies. In David Hackett Fischer’s book, “Washington’s Crossing”, he describes the troubles and even the unknowns of Washington’s experiences during the Revolutionary War. Fischer goes into detail about the first approach of the British as their massive naval fleet surrounds the state of New York all the way up to the point when the British became the defensive force rather than the offensive. “Washington’s Crossing” illustrates how the American Revolution wasn’t just pure success as at the beginning of the war, the Americans took many losses that almost completely crushed the revolution entirely. However, eventually the tides would
Although the British proved to be triumphant in the war, they lost a lot of money and a lot of soldiers. During the course of the years, Britain wanted economic relief and turned to the colonies. After the War, amplified British taxation on the colonies ruined the relationship that they had with the colonies. The British said the taxation