Dawkins and the Selfish Gene by Ed Sexton is an analysis of Richard Dawkins’ selfish gene theory. In his analysis, Sexton clarifies the many misinterpreted ideas and values of Richard Dawkins. Sexton introduces his analysis of the selfish gene theory by first telling the readers how sciences such as Darwin and Fundamentalism have impacted social and religious views on how humans operate and how humans should operate, in other words, morals. He continues by showing that to simply define what a gene is, is not an easy task. Sexton proceeds to dive into the science of replicators (the selfish genes) and their vehicles (the organisms). He goes into detail of the importance of the process of replicators replicating from parent to offspring, …show more content…
He delves deeply into the ideas of selfishness and altruism of genes. He describes to the readers how genes will affect their environment, meaning the organism and others genes around them, in order to proliferate more than its rival genes. Sexton uses the animal kingdom to compare the relationship between genes’ and organisms’ methods of proliferating. Sexton first explains how and why an animal would work with other animals to ensure only that individual animal’s own survival through reproduction. Sexton uses the structures and similarities of a family’s genepool as a way to explain this teamwork. He uses the example of how siblings, because they have similar genes, will go out of their way to ensure one another’s survival. While a distant relative because of differing genes, would not get the same treatment from the siblings, because it would not benefit their (or the genes’) selfish motives. Next, Sexton goes into the other methods of altruism, such as symbiosis and gender differences. Sexton compares how human society affects the male/female relationship, while in nature it is set by the reproductive success of males’ and females’ offspring. Sexton next goes into what exactly the gene does for the organism physically. He tells how without certain aspects from the environment, other genes, and cellular machinery, a gene alone would have no effect on the physical, nor structural appearance of an
DNA are inside genes, and genes are within cells. In each cell, there are different genes that have certain functions depending on where the are located in the body (Page 45). Within the cells, there are genetic switches that turn on and off the use of certain genes (Page 46). These genetic switches could have played a very important role in the genes that caused the development of the fish fin. With little changes over a long period of time, these genetic switches could have been the cause of the development of the human hand (Page 47).
Biology, the study of life and living organisms, is complex and encompasses a multitude of theories and ideas. In AP Biology, the first unit covered was evolution. Chapters 29, 31, 39, 40, 41, 42, and 43 in the textbook, Campbell’s Biology in Focus, not only discusses the four main ideas of biology: evolution, energy, information, and systems, but it also gives examples of each in order to help guide the reader’s understanding of the concepts. The first big idea of AP Biology is: “the process of evolution drives the diversity and unity of life.” Chapter 39 in the textbook encompasses this main idea through discussing natural selection and genetic diversity.
Francis Galton was the first major leader in the eugenics movement, his life was changed by the Darwinian Theory. “Francis Galton taught his followers that only the genetically perfect should be allowed to reproduce. He had “followers” that shows you how much him and many others believed that you need to have all these specific “perfect” characteristics to have children, so that your children will be “perfect.” This quote is saying that if your are not “perfect” then you have no right to reproduce. He wanted everyone to be beautiful, and smart so that they could produce beautiful and smart offspring. “Galton believed that certain races were superior…”
He claims that "all life evolves by the differential survival of replicating entities" (Meme 192). This states that in order for life to change, there are different ways of reproducing and passing along entities to the next
“Think of an adaptation, any adaptation, and some animal somewhere will have thought of it first,” says Crake in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake. This quote has a great deal to do with the themes of genetic engineering and biodiversity. In the book there is a constant reminder that nothing is real, and I believe that Atwood uses characters such as Jimmy’s mother to show the negative aspects of genetic engineering. She also uses the creation of pigoons, the BlyssPluss Pill, and the idea of human desire to show negative effects of genetic modification. As Jimmy grows up, he sees his world evolve into a place where everything and anything can be recreated, including human body parts, food, and nature.
’’Gene is a clever and thoughtful person. His friend Finny, who he loves and envies, he forms a love and hate realtionship. A Seperate Peace shoes how Gene’s envy and imintation of Finny affect him, affect his realtionship with Finny and achievement of peace. Gene’s envy and imitation of Finny affect him. Gene changes by attending social gatherings
This relates to two of the Big Ideas: Diversity and Unity of life and Evolution. To be more specific: the process of evolution drives the diversity and unity of life. The idea is that over time, because of environmental pressures, a population can change its "genetic makeup" because there are genetic variations within the population itself. Like how the rust disease actually helped people to survive during the black plague days instead of killing them. Another example of the Big Idea, “Unity and Diversity of Life” is when throughout the book, Moalem also describes the ancestry of Dr. Henry Louis Gates, a distinguished African American scholar on the Harvard board of African and African American Studies, to illustrate the genetic intermixing occurring around the world.
Sub point 1: So what are genes anyway? What do they do? You might think of genes as little computer programs, each designed to have a specific function. Every cell in your body has the same set of genes, but different cell types use different combinations of genes.
Charles Darwin became famous for his theory of natural selection. This theory suggests that a change in heritability traits takes place in a population over time. This is due to random mutations that occur in the genome of an individual organism, and offspring can inherit these mutations. This was defined as the key to evolution, this is because random mutations arise in the genome of an individual. Until the 19th century, the prevailing view in western societies was that differences between individuals of species were uninteresting departures from their platonic ideals of created kinds.
The theory also touched on the idea of natural selection-where evolution would eventually weed out the weak (Dyck, 2014). The theory also went on to inspire the idea that those who survived were a stronger species, thus giving hope safeguarding the health and endurance of the strong human (Mostert, 2002). While Darwin himself did not seem to be involved in eugenics, his cousin, Francis Galton used Darwin’s writings as an influence. He seemed especially inspired by On the Origin of Species. He believed that this model cited by Darwin gave evidence
When evolution is mentioned, people ponder about how an organism’s genome or phenotype has been altered in the span of thousands, if not millions of years. These alterations rely on the modification and adaption of species in their environment, however, based on a study by Nowak, “Five Rules for the Evolution”, the idea of evolution has expanded to parameters such as culture and cooperation. This study interprets this type of evolution in five conditions, “kin selection, direct reciprocity, indirect reciprocity, network reciprocity, and group selection” (Nowak, 2006). Each condition is a different approach for how a cooperator acts to help the benefited or how a defector avoids helping, i.e. based upon genetic relatedness, the probability of reoccurring encounters, social acquaintanceship, number of neighbors, and competition between cliques. These conditions construct new levels of organization and establishments of a benefit-to-cost ratio.
He says that, “We can not select genes that are not in the gene pool of the species.” For example there is no gene for wings in the gene pool of a pig. Would you expect to see a new born pig with a growing set of wings? No, because it is not in it’s DNA. This is what natural selection is proposing.
At the point of publication Galton had been a medical student, a naturalist, anthropologist and an explorer but from 1865 onwards Galton dedicated his life to the study of Eugenics. In 1869 Galton published his own controversial work Hereditary Genius. This work has been cited by some to be the starting point of the Nature versus Nurture debate. In some of the opening pages of the book Galton states it’s purpose
The theory is known for two main parts including “all life on earth is connected and related to each other and “ modifications of population by natural selection, where some traits were favored in and environment over others.” (Brian Richmond, curator of human origins at the American Museum of Natural History in New York City) At times the survival of the fittest can be misleading, due to the fact that it is not about the strength or ability a organism has but more the ability to survive and reproduce. One of the major contributions Darwin had the theory of development is the random genetic changes that occur in organisms in which allow them to thrive as a species. Small changes such as legs on fish becoming fins or nostrils on whales moving
Charles Darwin founded the biological theory of the survival of the fittest. The survival of the fittest is defined as the ongoing survival of organisms that are best adapted to the environment that they are living in, while others become extinct. Many people only applied this to nonhuman organisms, but that all changed in later years. Herbert Spencer found that this theory applied to human’s everyday life. An example would be comparing the rich to the poor.