The Magazine in which this article was published is known as Ms. Magazine, and was co-created by Gloria Steinem as an insert of New York magazine in the early 70’s. it has been the voice of many feminists throughout the decades. In this article, Gloria Steinem calls to arms the feminists of today. She states that this era of feminism should not take up the mindset of “relax; feminism was their mothers’ movement.” (3) Her fear is, the women of the wave she was involved in will be rooted in the past, when they really need to be focused on the future. She stressed the fact that we need to be focused on fighting for the rights the feminists in the 60’s and 70’s fought so hard for.
In Steinem’s first point, she addresses the inequality of the workforce
…show more content…
One of the big issues she discusses is the divide between the cost of child care and the cost of college tuition. This is something that most of the population must deal with at some point in their lives. It is stated that “The average cost of child care here has surpassed the average cost of college tuition.” (5) Woman outnumber men on college campus’ now and Steinem mentions how women are welcome because they are consumers and it is only when they are ready to go out into the world that women aren’t respected as viable commodities of …show more content…
Steinem brings up a startling statistic, “if you add up all of the women in the U.S. who have been murdered by their husbands or boyfriends since 9/11- and then add up all the Americans killed in 9/11 plus the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan- many more women have been murdered by their husbands or boyfriends.” There will be no hope for American society if society does not begin to look to the problems of its own and start to fix them; the issues on foreign soil seems to be of more importance to the American people then that of domestic terrorism.
She claims that women who pursue higher leveled jobs are hurting their families by not being there for them. Women can decide whether to vote or not and what to do with their own lives. They cannot be limited by others. Then she claims that in states that allow women to vote nothing gets done that women were fighting for. She believes that women should not have the right to vote because some women have not filled her expectation in the polls.
Her word choice for answering these questions is also important. She does an outstanding job making her point clear when answering the above question, saying, “It seems to me to be this:[...] arrange the world so that women can be human beings, [...] second, if and when they choose housework and child-raising, to have that occupation recognized by the world as work, requiring a definite economic reward… ”(Eastman, “Now we can begin” 1920). Her word choice plays a crucial part in her speech. If the wrong words were to be used, then her audience would have a lot more trouble confiding in
All these examples that she uses brings up her use of relevance. She lists how different scenarios were affecting the human rights of thousands of women all over the planet. She strikes a feeling of sympathy in her audience and has examples that could be relatable to all different types of backgrounds. She also repeats the line “will flourish” which is to emphasize the importance of providing women with a healthy lifestyle and education, also their families. She is saying that if women are healthy and educated, their families will be successful.
She begins to explain how Elizabeth Warren, a woman running for Senate in Massachusetts organizes her time efficiently to be able to care for a children and devote the time needed for her work. Whether this time being when her child is put down for nap or in other circumstances with her child being on her side as she sits at her desk working on her writings. The work environment for feminist has become a slippery slope; Slaughter mentions that in earlier years feminist enclosed their personal lives in hopes to no longer be
They are being forced into prostitution, and they are being barred from the bank lending offices and banned from the ballot box.” This quote provides some of the many struggles that women face daily. It uses the topic of motherhood, which is an extremely emotional topic, and the complications women have watching their children suffer as they try their best to provide for them. This quote also addresses the fact that fathers and brothers of women, or men in general, deny them the right of getting an education.
As her approach to bring all women together, hooks expresses one’s involvement in the movement from “I am a feminist” to “I advocate feminism”, whereas, she hoped that she could get rid of the fear of women being “labeled”. However, hooks goal was to represent feminism and take a demanding look at how different branches of feminism have strayed from what she thought and how hard it was to end the sexist oppression. Hooks think that liberal’s women focus was to achieve equality with men and don’t have to push for social change to end the domination. She also think
According to Steinem, boys and girls need to be equally represented in media so they both understand the importance of not only helping others and benefiting society but also receiving help from those more skillful. This message embodies the goal of true feminism, to empower women and feminize men to advance
“The Politics of Muscle,” an essay written by Gloria Steinem, is successful in effectively comparing and contrasting how society's standards implies that there is a difference in strength between men and women. Through the use of different rhetorical claims such as pathos, ethos, and logos, as well as a great deal of subjective and objective claims, Steinem establishes credibility which allows her to create a well-crafted essay. Although, the essay can be perceived as biased since it does not include a great deal of information on the perception of strength on men, its intended audience is women therefore, that aspect does not affect the overall quality of Steinem’s writing. In fact, it only strengthens it considering she expects her audience to share the same opinions and feelings as her. These reasons explain why overall, Steinem does a very good job of persuading the reader to think differently about the perception of women’s strength.
Successful in her mission to educate and spread awareness in Beijing and all across the world, Clinton’s speech led to “Beijing [legitimizing women’s rights] and [galvanizing] media attention to the issue” (Worden 35) which ultimately “energized the feminist movement and connected it more to the global human rights movement as well as the United Nations and governments” (Worden 36). In Clinton’s speech, she did not strive to make women feel sorry for themselves, but to show that women can overcome the hardships they face and the level of potential change has if women take initiative. Though progress has been made, the steps ahead add up to more than a mile. A survey taken from Penn. Schoen.
In his exclusive essay for Glamour, titled “President Obama Says, “This Is What a Feminist Looks Like”, former president Barack Obama shares his views as a feminist, as well as how it has impacted his life as a son, husband, father, and president. He states how growing up with a single mother, supporting his wife, and raising two daughters has inspired and formed his views as a feminist. Throughout his life, he has seen the progress of women’s role in society enhance over time and he claims that right now is an “extraordinary time to be a woman”. Though there is still room for improvement on women 's rights, our country has made great progress in the act of women’s rights, according to Obama. During his presidency, he admits that he was working on creating policies to further the equality of women and their rights.
Despite what some may think, women today are still not fully equal to men. In a post on nobullying.com discussing the history of discrimination against women in developing nations, it says that young girls account for “6o percent of the out-of-school population of children”(Discrimination Against Women). Women are expected to be a supporter of the breadwinner role of men, to stay at home and raise the children. But whoever came up with that stereotype? The answer is simple: men.
“When I have a daughter, I don’t want her to worry about having equal rights” ( site). This quote by professor, Kyle Morford, makes women rethink about what rights they have and what the future holds for them. These concerns arose after the Republican Presidential nominee,Donald Trump, won the presidential election. Women feel that the conservative candidate may eliminate or jeopardize all the rights women have worked to earn (site). Some individuals argue that women’s rights are not at stake, instead, they claim that women cannot live independently, without the government support.
Woman have been fighting for equality for a long time. We are still fighting to today to close the wage gap between men and women. The women's movement fought for their unalienable rights and the right to vote. The arguments of the women's movements were revolutionary.
If I were to live in the 1970s, I would have been apart of every feminist movement ever held. This type of writing inspires me, but also angers me as it most likely did to some women when this was written. I think this piece is brilliant in the way that it presents its message. The general population in America during the 70s may not agree. They may see it as a rebellion amongst women instead of a cry for equality.
5). The first wave feminists are regarded as the ‘godmothers’ of feminism because they claimed for controversial and critical changes, which then became part of women’s lives (Baumgardner & Richards, 2000; Henry, 2004; Heywood, 2006, as cited in Ewig & Ferree, 2013, p. 448). They laid the ground for further following feminists’ waves and movements, as for example the second wave of feminism (1960s – 1970s). Intersectionality was one of the ground-breaking differences in comparison to the first wave of feminism. The second wave feminists included a variety of women, other than just the white-bourgeoisie western women.