The non-fiction book Gulp by Mary Roach takes the reader on a fascinating and sometimes disgusting journey through the alimentary canal, which she calls “the most powerful taboo in human history”(Roach 18). Throughout the book Roach attempts to entertain, as well as inform, the reader by asking questions that many people would neither think or want to ask. Questions such as “Why do animals lick their wounds? Why don’t suicide bombers smuggle bombs in their rectums? Can constipation kill you?” (Roach 22). She then tries to provide the reader with answers to these difficult and somewhat uncomfortable questions by seeking out and interviewing experts from around the world. In fact, this book is ultimately an assortment of interviews pasted together, …show more content…
She has no science degree and began her career as a PR at the San Francisco Zoo. But what she lacks in credibility herself, she makes up for by quoting those individuals who are experts. All through the book, Roach is seen traveling the globe meeting with leading scientists and conducting interviews that provide the reader with an educated and accurate view on the aspects of the digestive system that this book covers. In regards to background information, Roach created this book as a way to share with the reader interesting stories and experiments related to the digestive system that she believes are, “mostly unmined”(Roach 22). The goals of informing and amusing the reader were the catalysts that influenced its publication, and as a result were the central ideas that drove the book forward. By writing this book Roach was not attempting to persuade the reader, therefore there is no true thesis statement. To reiterate what was stated in paragraph one, the book is just random compilation of stories and interviews with a very general sense of direction that can be found in the subject matter. The early chapters discuss experiments and information regarding the mouth while the concluding chapters take a look at the colon and the end of the system. Roach just tends to digress a bit in order to bring up points that she finds relevant, interesting, or too funny not to mention. These …show more content…
She then uses this as a transition to discuss the misconceptions about food. Beginning with pet food, Roach explains that most pet food brands are marketed towards humans not the animals. Pointing out that the way a dog shows that it likes a meal is by eating so much it throws up. She then shifts over to the consumption of organs and how beneficial it could be if they were introduced into the average persons diet. Finally Roach tackles chewing, and the question of whether chewing more would lead to a lower need of food consumption? To end her dissection of the mouth, Roach displays the greatness of Saliva and how it does so much more than just
Author and known Professor of Surgery at Duke University, Dr William Parker has made an argument in his article “.... But Intestinal Worms can be good for you, ” he establishes his argument of why worms can help people in a medical sense by appealing to the audience by using modes of persuasion, colloquial language and rhetorical questions, and positive connotations and repetition, as well as author's purpose. To begin with, Parker utilizes modes of persuasion by appealing to the audience with ethos, pathos, and logos. Parker first introduced at the beginning of the third paragraph in his article by appealing to ethos, a sense of credibility by referring to his “lab “ and his research as a form to make them believe that he is a professional.
In David Foster Wallace’s article “Consider the Lobster,” he describes the harsh reality of lobster eating. At the site of the World’s Largest Lobster Cooker at the Maine Lobster Festival, Wallace describes in detail the brutal treatment of lobsters in order for people to seek pleasure in their appetite. Wallace’s argument is that it is not right to “boil a sentient creature alive just for our gustatory pleasure” (700-701). He thoroughly describes the process in which lobsters are boiled alive in order to support his argument that because lobsters have feelings too, we should not boil sentient creatures alive for our pleasure. Wallace’s argument complicates Nijhuis’ view on nature because Nijhuis makes the point that people should essentially
In Jay Hardy article, “Medical Wisdom Challenged by a Cocktail” analyzes the discovery of the real cause of gastric ulcers. Also, he talked about Marshall’s struggle trying to prove his theory in an outrageous way. Most scientists thought the cause of stomach ulcers before Warren and Marshall’s discovery were stress, excess acid, and eating spicy food. However, German scientists researched that a spiral-shaped bacterium inhabited that was lining of the human stomach, but they couldn’t culture the organism. So, the research on stomach ulcers were forgotten.
Chapter nine commences by telling its readers about how Lee Harding was diagnosed with E coli 0157:H7. After eating some tacos at a Mexican restaurant, he started to have excruciating stomach pains and diarrhea. Harding’s stomach was hurting because of some frozen hamburgers he ate a couple of days ago. Those same hamburgers provided by Hudson Foods were infected with E. coli 0157:H7. Millions of those same frozen hamburgers had already been sold and most likely eaten.
“Food, Inc.” is a documentary about the production of food that many people do not know about. The purpose of the film was to bring awareness of the industrial food production hoping that viewers will make better choices when eating. It was an interesting film because it showed footages of farms, slaughterhouses and food packaging factories, things that some people might not be aware of because it is not usually covered in the news. Aristotle’s means of persuasion was used in this film to demonstrate the main points. Ethos was used throughout the film.
I have been fascinated after getting the privilege to read the book, Think Like a Freak by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Having read the first five chapters, namely; What does it mean to think like a freak? The three hardest words in the English language, What’s your problem? , Like a bad dye job, The truth is in your roots and Think like a child respectively, I have been able to gain a different insight towards approaching challenges in life. The chapters are not only educative but also captivating, and therefore a review of the sections would be essential.
Relevance between Food and Humans with Rhetorical Analysis In the modern industrial society, being aware of what the food we eat come from is an essential step of preventing the “national eating disorder”. In Michael Pollan’s Omnivore’s Dilemma, he identifies the humans as omnivores who eat almost everything, which has been developed into a dominant part of mainstream unhealthiness, gradually causing the severe eating disorder consequences among people. Pollan offers his opinion that throughout the process of the natural history of foods, deciding “what should we have for dinner” can stir the anxiety for people based on considering foods’ quality, taste, price, nutrition, and so on.
The Start Of Something Devastating During the the Renaissance the Bubonic plague killed millions of people in Europe. The plague “is a severe and potentially deadly bacterial infection that affects humans and mammals”( Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). In 1347 the plague first arrived to Europe it was something never seen before but heard of. People had theories of what was the cause of the plague but they were wrong not only did the bubonic plague bring death to most of the European population but it also caused an economic depression.
In the feature article “All Guts, No Glory”, I agree with the author Molly M. Ginty, that women participating in combat. If I was in the military some of the things that might affect me would be probably because of my gender. First, women would not be put into battle because people think women cannot handle the work or bloodshed. They think women are better off bring a nurse for helping men in battle if they get injured. Second, they think women in combat would be a distraction.
The putrid smell of Escherichia coli is one that is immediately identifiable to the few lucky individuals who recognize its scent. It is also an aroma with which I became intimately sensitive to as I shuttled petri dishes of the bacterium in and out of an incubator. While my classmates shied away from the task of handling the pungent bacteria used in our recombinant DNA experiments, I took to the task eagerly, anything that would take me one step closer to my goal of researching. I had the opportunity to learn about lab techniques and cutting edge biology concepts the summer before my junior year, in an extracurricular biotechnology class at Northwestern University’s Center for Talent Development. The class, a three week crash course in the
Hodgman had a knack for using humor in No Wonder They Call Me a Bitch. In such a repulsive essay she used humor to block out the nauseating unbearable parts of this Essay. Her misery was out pleasure. The descriptions were so revolting that I couldn’t help but laugh at the poor girls suffering. As Ann was about to devour the repelling meals she described in full detail the stomach- churning truth behind dog food.
The Wart and Merlin see a timid, scared roach. As they start to approach, the roach burst out in tears the roach says his mom is sick, Merlin asks the roach to lead him to his mother, which he does, Merlin says that it is probably nothing at all but hysteria. “If you p-p-p-please, doctor… it’s our mama, w-w-will she swim a-a-all the time upside d-d-d-down…’It is probably a case of nervous hysteria’” (White 48). White is showing us the state of the fish or the subjects that is under the king and how bad the conditions are, it has caused Mrs. Roach to go into a mental breakdown.
When I had first opened Ben Goldacre’s book “Bad Science”, I did not know what was to be expected. Know that I have read and assessed the book I feel as though I have learned something that has given me the confidence to voice my opinion and have evidence to support my arguments on how some products claim to have scientific proof. That being said, fish oils, vitamins, detox, and brain gym are all bullshit creations that should not be sold to the public. Now, I say this only after having read Bad Science, because these techniques are criticized and challenged by Ben Goldacre. I have learned that some detoxification methods are bogus and can be disproven in my very own kitchen, and I don’t have to be an accredited university scientist to be able to prove this.