Russel E. Train is the author. Train was the Chairman Emeritus of th World Wildlife Fund. He wrote this text in winter of 1996. The Center for the Study of the Presidency in Washington is the publisher of this text. It was published in Presidential Studies Quarterly, a scholarly press. This journal’s intended audience is scholars and students. He aimed to write towards those who are unsure of (or tend to ignore) what Nixon’s administration had accomplished environmentally. He also aimed to write towards those who tend to view Nixon negatively. People tend to not realize how successful Nixon was environmentally. Train believes “without a doubt in [his] mind” that the Nixon administration’s “single most significant domestic accomplishment” was …show more content…
He also used information from the several annual reports of the Council on Environmental Quality starting in 1970, and cites as so. In his notes at the bottom of his work, he added that the feels the best overall source of information about the Nixon Administration’s environmental record was from these annual reports. He includes direct quotations from Nixon himself, from Nixon’s message transmitting his plans to establish the EPA and NOAA to congress. These quotes were taken from Reorganization Plan No. 3. To further show how Nixon’s environmental work is often overlooked, Train makes mention of the book Nixon himself wrote, In the Arena, where he briefly mentioned his work with the environment in the footnote. Not only does the general public tend to ignore Nixons environmental accomplishments, Nixon himself views them as insignificant compared to his other works. Train also referes to Theodore H. White, and his book, Breach Of Faith. White was an observer of presidents and presidental candidates, and states that environmental policy and the invasion of Cambodia are 2 of Nixons great accomplishment, where his environmental policy is “ignored”and the invasion is “denounced”. Train also included various acts, proposals and legislations created and enacted during the Nixon administration, such as The various sources Train uses help further his main point, how Nixons environmental record is simply ignored by the majority of people. Train agrees with the majority of authors who have written about Nixons environmental record, however, not that many individuals have written about Nixon and the environment. Train disagrees with others who ignore Nixons environemntal success, as he feels these people view the Watergate Scandal and other things Nixon had done as more significant and
Benedek Sandor Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Essay Jimmy Carter, a former U.S. president, visited the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge with his wife where he decided that this natural beauty is something that he wanted to protect. He witnessed tens of thousands of caribou migrating across the tundra with their newborn calves. Carter became saddened to think what might happen if this beauty was destroyed so he signed the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act in 1980 to protect the wilderness. Carter uses reasoning and evidence to develop ideas and strengthen the logic and persuasiveness of his argument.
Jimmy Carter, a former US president effectively incorporates logos – facts and evidence, pathos – appealing word choice and emotion, and ethos – credibility to build his persuasive argument. Carter strives to contend that the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should not be developed for industry. First, throughout the article, there are many situations where Jimmy Carter incorporates facts and examples. For example, he states, “The Arctic Refuge might provide 1 to 2 percent of the oil our country consumes each day.” By using such numbers, Carter forces the reader to evaluate the situation by recognizing the difference between an insignificant financial income and enormous damage to the territory.
It’s a secondary source interpretation of an evaluation of Nixon and the United States begin and the end with Nixon indecisive decisions. It’s purpose was to move forward to a new prosperity without war as befits all together and along a board front and balance the price control of the unemployment and inflation front. The origin of the source is valuable because it gives an interpretation of Nixon and how his crisis was America’s crisis. He mirrors the polity and its moods of confidence and self-doubt. Limitations includes that the interpretation may not be fully indicated, because in the source A on page 137 “ The New Economically” in search of Nixon, it’s stated that, “As is clear, we have not sought to analyze Nixon’s New Economic Policy (reminiscent of Lenin’s NEP?) in economic terms.”
Theodore Roosevelt: “Conservation As A National Duty” introduces the problem of the lack of natural resources, and how are we going to fix the problem for future generations? Roosevelt makes connection between conservation and progress,patriotism,and morality of the American people by putting different people since or point of view of other people and himself to not waste our natural resources. He uses other people 's point of view by asking and using other people 's feeling about the crisis that they are in the middle of right now. (Stated in paragraph 3) “so vital is this question,that for the first time in our history the chief executive officers of the states separately,and of the states together forming the nations,have have met to consider.
His use of ethos helped to reconstruct his lost creditability; By giving the people straight facts to marinate and chew on, Nixon let the people come to their own conclusion as to the type of person that he was; his appealing to the emotional side of people let them know that he too is a just an average person. In the end, the use of his techniques in harmony allowed him to win the hearts of the American people, which allowed them to see that he was an honest, hardworking, average Joe American with nothing to hide, just like the
On January 28th, 1986, Ronald Reagan, the president of the United States at the time, in his speech, entitled “Challenger Disaster,” addressed the Challenger Disaster. He supported this claim by first mourning over the tragedy, then he promoted NASA, also he tried to make sense of this calamity, and finally he informed the audience that the seven astronauts will never be forgotten and as a country we will be forever thankful for their service. Through Reagan’s use of tone, rhetorical analysis, and rhetorical tools he effectively persuaded America to mourn and appreciate the lives of the seven astronauts loss and to convince American people to continue their support for NASA and move forward as a country. Reagan unified America with his supportive
Which at first glance looks like a positive thing but once you dive deeper into what his real motives are, it's rather eye opening. Let's start with the war on crime. During this time you had the black panthers who were people fighting for civil rights, people who were fighting for women's rights, and people who were fighting for gay rights. Nixon felt the need to fight against these movements and therefore one was more likely to get arrested for attending these rallies— for committing a crime which really wasn't a crime. He strategically blinded the public to this by calling it "the war on crime".
All of this deceit only made Nixon viewed as dishonest and shady to the American people, making his impeachment seem almost predictable. But something that was not predicted was Richard Nixon’s
Throughout the speech the evidence Nixon uses to support his speech mostly comes from a logical perspective. He heavily employs the use of logos on his audience, but often contradicts what he has previously said and often provides no details to confirm the validity of his argument. An example of one such contradiction is when Nixon brings up his finances and how much he owes. Nixon says, “We have a house in Whittier, California which cost $13,000 and on which we owe $3,000.” The problem with this statement is that later on in his speech he
In 1969 he administration implemented the affirmative-action program to promote equality by increasing minority employment and education but there was a lot of disagreement about this program. The most common was that this attempted to discriminate individuals that never caused discrimination at the first place. The most affected class of people by this program was the white working-class and they heavily opposed it. Nonetheless the program passed and is still on power nowadays. However Nixon's domestic policy was very confusing.
Jimmy Carter - Persuasive Techniques Usually, when people have to give a speech or write an essay they have to convey a message or convince the audience of a specific idea or argument. In this instance it is very important for the speaker to use the correct techniques so they can connect to the audience and convince them of their point of view. For politicians especially they must be able to have the audience intrigued and convinced of their ideas. In his speech to prevent those who wanted to industrialize and drill oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska, President Jimmy Carter can be seen using many of the common argumentative techniques, such as logos, pathos, and ethos, to convince his audience against the industrialization of the Refuge. To build his argument, the reader can see Carter use his personal experiences, historical evidence, and alternative options to support his claim.
The misunderstanding, the necessity for a man to come here and bare his soul?” With this statement, Nixon is trying to show Americans that he truly cares about what has been said about him by the people. Nixon is proud of this country and believes that strong leadership is the way to restore its
Not all of America responded kindly to FSA’s photos and documentaries, or to the New Deal for that matter. Many claimed photographers and filmmakers along with Eastern bureaucrats sensationalized and “exaggerated the damage of the Dust Bowl, had vilified an entire region in order to score political points for the Roosevelt administration” (Dunaway, 2005, pp. 54-55). Though many alleged FSA photos were politically driven, Stryker held steadfast to his ideals and denied they served as government propaganda (Gordon, 2006; Brennen & Hardt, 1999; Stange, 1989). Some have argued the photos themselves were not propaganda, but became propaganda because of how they pushed a specific ideology on the public.
On August 8th, 1974 at exactly 9:01 pm, Richard Nixon--former President-- gave a speech that would affect both United States history and the american people. Richard Nixon’s argument and claim lay within the textual aspects, in other words, his tone, attitude, and the strategic ways of presenting to his audience. In this historical speech, Richard Nixon broadcasted his character, past decisions, and future advice to the people of the United States in order to justify his resignation from the presidential office. The rhetorical stylistic tools were effective and instrumental in backing up the argument. Recognition of audience was important, because it will determine his attitude and tone, which was innocence.
1. What problems did the United States face in the Vietnam War? As the United States struggled against communism in Vietnam, it would face many problems. In the late 1950’s President Eisenhower and later President Kennedy sent military supplies and advisers to South Vietnam. Despite the American aid the Vietcong grew stronger with support from North Vietnam.