In Nicholas Carr’s essay “Is Google Making Us Stupid” I disagree that his use of support doesn’t work to make his point in this essay because it is too biased. Carr’s article shows a lot of support to his hate towards the internet by quoting himself along with his other fellow writers who are a part of an older generation like Carr himself and only includes one study from University College London. Carr mainly focuses on his anecdotes to help support his essay which really doesn’t give the audience actual information, although he makes a compelling point that Google or the internet itself is making us stupid, but what Carr has not included was any evidence about the good parts about the internet. What Carr was lacking in his essay was that …show more content…
Just like how we use to traditionally read, but now we gravitate towards what we are interested in and what is useful to us. In the third paragraph Carr talks about hyperlinks, Carr goes on about when we “power browse” it becomes much more helpful in seeing the depth of a subject that we are looking for.
Another reason why Carr’s essay was unjustly biased is because included support about the good things about the internet is that the internet allows us to communicate on a whole other level that lets us see and read about different cultures without leaving the comforts of our homes. Online open forums like Reddit, Facebook, and Twitter, these sites that we use allow us to connect with people from all over the world can can also allow people to read about a certain topic that interests the people to view it and to discuss it with not only other people near their area, but with people who are also living in other regions. Before, it would be impossible to see photos of the flooding that took place in California or places like pro or anti Trump rallies that took place at that moment in time. People who live in or near the areas that have could see these events are posting and sharing their own pictures to their friends, families, and right before you know it, it’s on the internet where everyone in the whole world to see. Because of
…show more content…
It’s becoming our map and our clock, our printing press and our typewriter, our calculator and our telephone, and our radio and TV”. What Carr is telling us obviously is that he believes that most of these tools that we use on a daily basis are controlling how we live but Carr sets this up as a scare tactic to think that we are not in control when in actuality we are in control of what we do with or without our tools. In my personal experience I use these tools on a daily basis but I use them in a normal matter. For example how I use the clock is to tell time because I myself have a busy schedule to keep up with during the day. We need these tools to keep up with society and manage our time because everything in society does not revolve around us. Carr leads the reader on about his self expectation prophecy that Carr believes he is right about how technology is taking over our minds and making us stupid, which is not the case. The case is that since society is changing for the better, however Joseph Weizenbaum says “In describing when to eat, to work, to sleep, to rise, we stopped listening to our senses and started obeying the clock”. Weizenbaum describes time as this dictative ruler that we are following it’s rules out of fear, it’s true that we follow time’s rules but we follow it’s rules because time is not an illusion that we can just forget like time is a thing of the past, we are more intelligent compared to animals who use their instincts, we are not
We adapted around the clock, molded our minds around the concept of time until it no longer felt like a technology. Carr concludes that similar conditions are happening to our brains, we are molding around internet, phones, and other
In Nicholas Carr’s writing, “Is Google Making Us Stupid,” mentions multiple examples of why the internet and the simplicity of looking up and getting exactly what we were looking for are causing a drop in the way we think and the intelligence of our minds. Carr explains that he was once a huge reader and could comprehend ten to fifteen-page articles easily, but the directness of the internet had dulled his brain that he could not read a few paragraphs before he gave up and his mind started drifting off into the emptiness of his brain. Carr mentions that the Net is being the universal medium causing information that is read and learned go in one ear and out the other. Carr defends his positions by adding multiple examples showing that the Net
Rhetorical Analysis In the article “Is Google Making us Stupid?”, author Nicholas Carr expresses his idea that the internet is taking over society and our thinking process. Google is affecting our abilities to read books, longer articles, and even older writings. Carr believes that we have become so accustomed to the ways of the internet, and we are relying on Google 's ability to sort through the details for us so we don 't have to, in order to get the information we find necessary more efficiently. He finds that this process has become almost too handy, and that it is corrupting us from becoming better educated.
Within Is Google Making Us Stupid? By Nicholas Carr, the rhetorical devices that Carr uses allows for deep meaning to develop in the text. It also evokes emotions within the reader which makes him or her question if the internet is actually making him or her stupid. Carr also uses the different devices to persuade the audiences that the internet is actually more harm than beneficial. By using the devices he is able to make the reader rethink what he or she has thought before and question his or her thoughts.
As previously mentioned, Carr likely wants his audience to critically think about the internet; persuasion that the internet might bring about intellectual tragedy comes second to that. Personally, a lot of his examples of ethos are effective only if the “authorities” mentioned were familiar names. For example, the bloggers were people I have never heard of, and thus, their testimonies are the same value to me as the testimonies of someone who posts on Twitter. However, in gauging whether he succeeded in getting me to think about the internet more, Carr definitely succeeded. All in all then, Carr’s article was one that wants to critically challenge thought by revealing the points of view from both side and letting the readers make their own
Additionally, Carr includes metaphors which incite pathos. He comments that our minds are being subject to pressure to “operate as high-speed data-processing machines” (Carr 12). This is an unhealthy expectation, and it leads most individuals to turn to websites such as Google in order to supplement (or even replace) their own brainpower. Comparing the expectations of our minds to be akin to some sort of supercomputer incites concern in the reader… they may realize for the first time the truth in this statement. Overall, Carr used far more rhetorical devices within his essay than I have been able to elaborate on (including, but not limited to, precise diction, a somewhat casual tone in order to help readers relate, and appositives to build his
A well-known author, Nicholas Carr, in his article, “Is Google Making us Stupid” explains to us in great detail why he believes that the internet is affecting our brains in a negative way. In this article, Carr wants us to believe that Google is making us stupid because we are losing our ability to focus on longer novels and bigger word choices. His purpose is to try and show us why he believes that using the internet has lowered our ability to read and think the way we used to. He wants to show all of us readers, who are always on the internet everyday of our lives, through personal experiences and research how the internet has becoming damaging to our brains. Carr is able to use logos, pathos and Ethos to show the readers his purpose.
In the text, Carr brings up various forms of evidence that the internet is having an effect on the way that we think and the way that we
One of Carr’s main arguments would have to be that he sees the internet as a benefit and also very harmful in the same sense. He speaks about how “The Web has been a godsend to me as a writer” and how it has been a useful tool to him. It has made it much easier and faster to research information
Amanda Green Mrs. Boone Eng. 111. 4236 26 February 2018 Is Google Really Making Us Stupid?
Carr believes that this use of the prominent use of the internet is clearly changing the way that human’s think. In contrast, others may believe that his argument
Carr continues talking about his own experience and explains, ““They supply the stuff of thought, but they also shape the process of thought. And what the Net seems to be doing is chipping away my capacity for concentration and contemplation. My mind now expects to take in information the way the Net distributes it: in a swiftly moving stream of particles.” Technology plays a major role in shaping our thinking, because it results in us thinking less about what we’re seeing online and just assuming that it’s true. It’s depriving us of the ability to challenge the information, which puts us in danger of misinformation and lack of individual thought.
Rhetorical Analysis of Nicholas Carr’s “Is Google Making Us Stupid? We are at a time where technology is widespread; it has become a part of our everyday life leading to advantages and disadvantages. Technology nowadays has become the most important topic to discuss and everyone has developed their own unique opinion. In Nicholas Carr’s article published in 2008, “Is Google Making Us Stupid” he argues that as technology progresses people’s mentality changes.
Carr believes that we depend on the Internet more than just looking up the answers in the book ourselves. He is trying to prove that our generation is consumed by the Internet. In addition to this, I feel his argument is effective because he builds credibility with personal facts, using statistics, and making emotional appeals throughout the essay. He gives many details and examples to backup and support his argument. Nicholas Carr gives himself credibility by stating that he knows what’s going on in his own mind, this is where he is uses ethos.
He starts his argument by telling us the effect the internet has had on him and others he has come across. The internet has changed his train of thought and his ability to focus and concentrate. He believes our brains have been reprogramed over time to adjust to the speed and convenience of the internet. Our ability to retain and digest traditional media has also been compromised since we are used to receiving information so rapidly. This is a strong opening argument for his essay.