In The Grapes Of Wrath, By John Steinbeck, the ending is very controversial in many ways, the most obvious ways though are fundamentally wrong, morally wrong, and just how depressing it is.Since the book came out in 1939, everyone has had a opinion on the ending to John Steinbeck’s Grapes of Wrath. Michael Harmon once said, “The ending can be seen two ways, as a tool for people to recognize the poverty and destruction at that time, or as a way to get more citizens to read the book”. It has a very controversial ending, that Steinbeck thought would name the last nail into the coffin, so to speak, on how bad the dust bowl and moving west really was. Ma and Rose of Sharon look at each other and they agree that Rose of Sharon should use her milk, that she doesn’t need because her baby was stillborn, and feed this old man. Everyone gets out of the barn, and she feeds him.
The Grapes of Wrath is one of several novels he wrote to express this. The 1930s and the beginning of the Great Depression was a time of major change from the happiness and well-being found in the 1920s. As the 1920s were a time of prosperity and wealth for many Americans, the 1930s brought about the Great Depression. As the Great Depression
John Steinbeck’s novel “The Grapes of Wrath” chronicles the trek across the country from the viewpoint of the Joad family from Oklahoma. Their journey represents issues and struggles that occured for these migrants. From death, to employment, to disappointment, and little hope, the hardships of these migrations
In the first chapter Orleanna is the narrator who describes the setting and talks about a ruin that is so bad that it does not seem possible that it could have happened. She also goes on to foreshadow the death of her youngest child, Ruth May. She also asks for forgiveness and discusses the reasons for why it took her so long to leave her husband. In the last chapter it seems as though Ruth May is the narrator who is responding to her mother. As stated in the first chapter, there is a “woman with four girls in tow.” In the last chapter “the same woman...only [has] three daughters.” This shows that this is occuring after Ruth May’s death and she is saying, “Mother, you can still hold on but forgive, forgive and give for as long as we both shall live I forgive you, Mother”
The protesters want change like the citizens of California want water during a drought. The issue of not getting paid enough to have a stable living environment has been going on for decades. In the reading The Grapes of Wrath, John Steinbeck tells a detailed story about a family, the Joad’s, that moved out west to California for a better life. The downfall was that the life they were striving toward didn’t turn out how they expected. The Joad’s expected there to be work when they arrived in California but upon arrival, they quickly found that there were fewer jobs available.
From lines 14-17 the tone is full of fear and vulnerability. Due to this fear and vulnerability, it portrays that Sharon is a woman. The tone shifts from fear to power from lines 18-34. In these lines, Sharon states that “white skin makes [Her] life] easy and she must “profit” from “his darkness.” From this shift in tone, it shows that dark people have no say in the society. Certainly, from the above “On The Subway” it gives insights and contrasts of the both worlds.
In the Novel “The Grapes of Wrath”, written by John Steinbeck in 1939 near the end of the great depression, the injustices of poverty and homelessness presented against Tom Joad and his family, force Tom to keep his dignity and self-respect. While continuing to fight for his family in the overcrowded California Hoovervilles, and looking for jobs to survive the unfortunate circumstances laid out for Tom because of the dust bowl and the great depression, his decorum never slumps. This gloomy life forecast never stops Tom from having a kind heart filled with generosity towards others around him. “Man, unlike any other thing organic or inorganic in the universe, grows beyond his work, walks up the stairs of his concepts, and emerges ahead of his
David is allowed three questions, and he asks Sharon them, and she answers, but the differences Sharon has to live with what she has done, butwhen reading we think to ourselves that she got off easy. We don’t feel that she won’t have manyproblems with living with what she has done. At the end of the story Sharon dies and as we learned in the beginning of the story on the first page in the first paragraph when David says on page 1 “ We were the only confirmed Native American Roman Catholics.” In this quote
The Grapes of Wrath, by John Steinbeck depicts actual historic settings. The settings within the novel are the Great Depression of the 1930’s and the effects of the Dust Bowl on the Midwest. Thousands of families became homeless, causing them to travel to the West in hopes to receive a job. During this difficult time, the Joad family traveled and, at times, lived in the family car. Once they arrived in California, they also had to endure such hardships as staying in the Hooverville Camp as well as the Weed Patch Camp.
Grapes of Wrath Critical Analysis An individual is never alone when we all share a commonality of being human. The saving value of family and fellowship is prominently displayed by John Steinbeck in his novel “The Grapes of Wrath.” Each character worked together striving for a comfortable future for their family. Through their acts of kindness and selflessness, the people around them feel a sense of belonging and security being among other people. Their journey has taken them through different parts of the vagrant community scattered around California. Prosperity is not equally established among the entirety of the nation and this creates a disarrayed sight of poverty.