Where There Aren’t No Ten Commandments from the novel King Leopold’s Ghost, written by Adam Hochschild’s was an interesting journey. Adam discussed the terrible and unmoral conditions of the Congo state from the 1800s through the 1900s. Throughout the text, the writer told the history of King Leopold II of Belgium who conquered the port of Congo which was multiple times larger than Belgium itself. There, he was the sole ruler unlike his “limited power at home”. It included tales of European males fleeing their home country in favor of gaining recognition in their life, Africans losing their homes, families and even their lives because they were not up to standards of the highly “civilized”. Additionally, I have accumulated some comparisons …show more content…
It included things such as politics. For instance, the book refers to “Leopold’s power” as being “absolute” (King Leopold’s Ghost). In the Americas, specifically the Caribbean, conquerors there had to report to Queen Victoria who resided at the home country. This left the conquistadors with an economic responsibility and no real political influence or power in the home country. Therefore, they could be as brutal as they wanted to without the queen knowing about their gruesome behavior. While actions such as those committed that would have been condemned by Queen Victoria would have been praised by Leopold or awarded with a slap on the wrist” (King Leopold’s Ghost). Other differences included land conditions, climate, and trade goods each colony provided. For example, the Caribbean was known for their sugar plantations and rich soil. Africa on the other hand, offered things such as ivory. Unfortunately, most of the land was uncultivable or what they addressed as “vacant land”. Also, they did not “have the resources to exploit the entire territory, so another set of decrees carved parts of the Congo into several giant blocks, whose “vacant land” was leased out for long periods as concessions to private companies” ( King Leopold’s Ghost). I personally thought this was a highly clever way to not only get use of the land, but also collect a profit from the …show more content…
For example, Leopold establishing three colonies for children for education and military purposes. Most of conquerors would not think twice about the kids enough and the value of education. Their idea was to keep them ignorant enough, therefore the slaves were easy to manipulate. For Africa, their main goal was to raise soldiers and “gather the most male children possible”. In conclusion, the Congo was an Empire of ivory, built on exploitation. They utilized get rich quick schemes and their actions against black natives was absolutely senile. In comparison to the Americas, they used forced labor, came to colonize for new opportunities, and had various successful slave revolts. I thought this source was very important to read because it taught me various things previous history classes would have never. Mostly because only the winners write the
Without the colonization of Tanganyika, resources may have not been obtained as easily and may require more force. B. Congo Free State was a colony to Belgium, specifically King Leopold II. Leopold took control of the country and began leeching the resources from the lands, such as ivory, palm oil, and rubber. In return, handles, soap and candles, and waterproof clothes were made.
Summary of the text: Adam Hochschild’s King Leopold's Ghost: A Story of Greed, Terror, and Heroism in Colonial Africa is a historical fiction published in 1998 (Hochschild, 1998). It comprises a myriad of evidence to testify the Belgian King Leopold II’s atrocities in Congo between 1885 and 1908 for the sake of capturing the attention of various readers towards the Belgian imperialist delinquencies through a detailed narration of a number of main characters’, including George Washington Williams and William Henry Sheppard, experiences in Belgian Congo (Hochschild, 1998). In this excerpt, it illustrates William’s peaceful exploration in Congo as the first American-Black missionary. During his journey, not only did he explore the Congolese culture,
Have you ever had the feeling of being more superior than anyone else, and that you could take anything/everything away from them in a period of time. This is what the European countries did to African community such as taking all of their culture, pride, land, and resources. Through 300 years(1500-1800) there were many new creations, inventions, and trades happening around Africa. And Africa went through a stage of horror by the european countries trying to take over parts of Africa. In a political point of view in “Document A” it showed all of the seven countries taking over Africa, In “Document C” it has showed that the technology was a key role in the imperialism, lastly is “Document E” that has showed how all of the money paid into another
Due to the Atlantic Slave trade, exporting slaves increased across Southern Africa and Europe. The victims in slavery continued subjection to hard labor, abuse and profit exchange. The Portuguese were first responsible for exporting Muslims. These slavery practices disintegrated cultures, and relations. The Europeans bear responsibility for exporting slaves from Africa, while the Portuguese bears responsibility for African slave raiders.
“No African delegates were present. Simply put, the European powers agreed to recognize any areas that were already occupied to being developed by other European nations. Because of this, there was a big push to the interior of Africa by competing European Armies, as they all rushed to establish…legitimate claims on areas not occupied by other European powers.” This really struck me because it shows they didn’t care about the African people at all, in fact they could care less. And that’s what starts rebellions.
As Frederick Lugard's explains the Europeans taught the Africans how to conduct their own affairs with justice and humanity. This demonstrates that European imperialism was harmful because it shows how the Europeans were not acknowledging that Africans could teach themselves how to do many of the things that European people were doing their
Summary of the text: Adam Hochschild’s King Leopold 's Ghost: A Story of Greed, Terror, and Heroism in Colonial Africa is a historical fiction published in 1998, which contains a myriad of evidence to testify the Belgian King Leopold II’s atrocities in Congo between 1908 and 1909 (Hochschild, 1998). As a fiction, it intends to capture the attention of various readers towards the Belgian imperialist delinquencies through a detailed narration of a number of main characters’, including George Washington Williams and William Henry Sheppard, experiences in Belgian Congo (Hochschild, 1998). In this excerpt, it illustrates William’s peaceful exploration in Congo as an American-Black missionary. During his journey, not only did he explore the Congolese culture, but he also tried to spread Christianity to Congo (Hochschild, 1998). Although he failed to bring the religion to Congo, he became a popular in Congo and the old world.
According to Document H, Letter to Leopold II, people tried to trick many Africans into giving them land. In document H it says,” Mr. Henry Stanley and several Zanzibar soldiers used carefully rehearsed… sleight of hand tricks when making treaties with the native chiefs of the Independent State of the Congo… whole villages have been signed away to Your Majesty.” This shows how the colonizers were trying to gain land, maybe to gain wealth that came from the trade there, for their country. Document E, Letter to Sir George Grey, states,” … Sir George Napier, marked down my limits on a treaty he made with me.
Safia Geurin Mr. Robinson I&S January 6, 2023 Exploitation of the Congo The Congo Free State was exploited through European Imperialism. European Imperialism was conquering foreign lands for natural resources and a new market. This is what created a European empire. Belgium colonized the Congo, a region in central Africa. Congo was home to many natural resources, such as rubber and ivory.
Belgium was marginalizing the population of the Congo by giving them no say in anything, and profiting of the resources of the area. The people of Congo themselves did not make money off of the resources leaving them powerless and poor, but instead the government of Belgium was the one making all the money. As a result, exploitation of resources hurt the people of the Congo politically, economically and
Imperialism In Africa Imperialism was a huge advancement for Europeans in the nineteenth century. Europeans sought to colonize Africa in search for raw materials and markets. Colonies in Africa were affected negatively by Imperialism, it brought many problems regarding military, economic, and social changes to the African society. Warfare, natives losing their land, and foreigners degrading the natives were all significant effects that were bad for the Africans.
Hochschild's argument successfully claims that European imperialism in Africa (specifically that of King Leopold) led to devastating effects on the natives and their land. The nineteen-chapter, two part book starts off with a brief introduction. This introduction sets up the first part of the book, where the Hochschild describes the early life of Leopold and his main explorer: Henry Morton Stanley. From the first European-completed expedition of the Congo River and its basin to the Berlin Conference, Hochschild explains the story behind Leopold’s reception of the Congo - specifically how he gained power of the Congo with only the permission of
In The Legacy, Basil Davidson discusses the legacies of colonialism in Africa and gives an insight on modern Africa and the successes and downfalls that it possesses. Moreover, he states that many of the issues seen in modern day Africa are not new and have their roots in the long years of European colonialism that profoundly shaped and continues to shape the continent. Throughout the documentary, various themes regarding postcolonial Africa are mentioned in depth. A few of the themes that Davidson highlights are modernization, ethnicism, corruption, inequality, dictatorship, and neocolonialism.
Another use of power is how the Europeans view the native Africans, they think it’s fine, that it’s normal to have them in their control just like the nature of Africa. They see the native Africans just like their nature, something to be in control of. This may stem from their different skin types and the fact that this novel takes place in the late 1800s. That is another theme that is shown in this novel,