Introduction The recent article in the New York Times with the title ‘Making Medicaid a Tool for Moral Education May Let Some Die’ is worth reviewing. President Trump promised Americans that his policies are directed towards making America a great country again. He proposed to repeal the Affordable Care Act and as a result there has been some changes in Medicaid enrollment policy. Kentucky became the first state to impose work requirement to be eligible for Medicaid. Governor Matt Bevin in Kentucky announced that all the residents of Kentucky who are not disabled and who are 19 to 64-year-old must work in order to get the Medicaid coverage. The pregnant women and the people who cannot work due to their medical requirement are excluded from this requirement. The residents must work at least 20 hours a week to be eligible. They can work, or obtain job training or do community service to obtain the coverage. Not only the residents have to work but they must pay for it too. The payment requirements are different according to whether the family above or below the poverty threshold. For the families living on one quarter of poverty threshold should pay a premium of 1$ and the families who live above the poverty line must pay 15 $. Article Review …show more content…
Is it done to save the money or is it done for the moral education? Governor Matt Bevin said that these changes are done to provide moral education to the people of Kentucky as this will provide them with a path forward and upwards and they will start to fend for themselves. But imposing the work requirement on the Medicaid eligibility will also save State’s money. Infact, it might reduce the Medicaid spending by about 2.4 billion dollars over next five-year period. About 175,000 Medicaid beneficiaries do not meet the work requirement in Kentucky and will lose the
One of the author’s reasoning for how taking away ACA would affect Medicaid is back in 2016 legislation tried to step away from it, but former President Barack Obama repealed it because could eventually affect the lives of millions of people. The authors also cover how ACA changed Medicaid for the better, for example creating a program for just children’s coverage, inventing a new method to determine eligibility, and even creating new benefit options for families and small businesses. The author describes how the new Presidential administration can repeal or alter Medicaid through Section 1115. The authors main argument is that by repealing ACA would eliminate the Medicaid system which in turn will allow millions of people to be
The fourth observation from reviewing Indiana’s financial report is it is expanding state funded health care, primarily Medicaid. Medicaid has a staggering impact on Indiana’s financial statements. In 2016, “the largest portion of the State’s expenses is for Welfare which is $14.3 billion or 44.4% of total expenses” (14). Medicaid was the primary expense under welfare, totaling $10.6 billion in 2016 (14). In 2015, 44.8% of total expenses were welfare related (Indiana 2015 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report 14); however, Medicaid costs in 2016 were $9.2 billion resulting in a 15.2% cost increase.
Caption: Little Sisters of the Poor v. Burwell Citation: No. 15-105, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 578 U.S. __ (2016), March 23, 2016, Argued, May 16, 2016, Decided Facts: 1. The contraceptive mandate of the Obama Care requires all employers, who have more than 50 employees, to include contraceptive coverage through their health insurance plans. 2. The mandate allows non-profit organizations who object to the contraceptive coverage to seek exemption from paying for the contraceptive costs by filing form 700.
But the American Medical Association (AMA)—backed by powerful Republicans averse to spending money on social welfare—claimed the program was tantamount to Bolshevism. Baker was in Washington the day a young New England doctor explained the AMA’s position to a congressional committee: “We oppose this bill because, if you are going to save the lives of all these women and children at public expense, what inducement will there be for young men to study medicine?” Senator Sheppard, the chairman, stiffened and leaned forward: “Perhaps I didn’t understand you correctly,” he said: “You surely don’t mean that you want women and children to die unnecessarily or live in constant danger of sickness so there will be something for young doctors to do?” “Why not?” said the New England doctor, who did at least have the courage to admit the issue: “That’s the will of God, isn’t
To qualify and receive Medicaid, one of the criteria’s are to be poor and pregnant, which is also state funded. The funding cut from Planned Parenthood, will be used in other areas involving female medical services. Some are also wondering what
First, state taxpayers may experience rising healthcare costs disproportionate to other states (Mahan, 2). Without tailored federal assistance, health care costs may contribute to an unbalanced state budget that burdens the taxpayer. In order to account for this, states may be forced to eliminate certain programs, therefore, leaving some without coverage. Medicaid currently covers almost 70 million Americans, including one in three children, four in 10 births and 70 percent of nursing home residents (Kodjak, 2). With the implementation of block grants, especially without clear guidance and infrastructure, those currently covered by the Affordable Care Act could very well experience reduction or loss of their health coverage.
*Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) helps with low-cost health coverage to children with families that earn too much money and do not qualify for Medicaid. Also with that, CHIP can also cover pregnant women and parents. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ mission statement is “finding new ways to pay for and
Florida Department of Children and Families (DCF) is a state agency, regulated and funded by the State of Florida and federal government, that is designed to help low-income Floridians with health insurance (Medicaid), food stamps, cash assistance, child protection investigation, refugee assistance, and so forth. For the Medicaid program, there are many types of Medicaid: MAR-adult, MMC/MMI/MN-child/infant, MMP-pregnant women, MOY-teen Medicaid, MSC-disable, and more. The Florida Medicaid plans include MediPass, health maintenance organizations (HMOs), and provider service networks (PSNs). The Agency’s mission is to protect the vulnerable, promote strong and economically self-sufficient families, and advance personal and family recovery and
Medicaid expansion is still somewhat confusing to me, however I do have an understanding of the requirements such as the income falling between 0-400 percent of the federal poverty level. I also understand that this has become an issue of disparities between states due to expansion. I am partial to each state being able to decide the best options for their citizens. As you stated Emily, I can see how the decision of the state such as whether to expand or not to expand can cause harm to the constituents. I disagree with the philosophy of covering “able-bodied” poor.
What happens President Trump and Congress, when employers’ start dropping employee insurance? There go the dependents under 26. Not only do mom and dad have to go buy insurance for themselves but also, Sally and Jimmy who are still in elementary school. In addition to that, their older boy, Bobby who is 23 will also need insurance. Bobby is in his 5th year of college, studying to be a Fermentation Scientist (beer brewer).
This option allows low income people to still have access to affordable coverage and each state can provide for their residents. There are certain income requirements that people need to meet in order to be eligible for Medicaid. The income requirement is different for individuals who are over 65 or who are disabled as compared to single people with no children. For example if a single individual makes $16,643 a year or a family of three makes $28,180 a year, they would be eligible for
In the article “Ten Things Trumpcare Changes” it states that “under Obamacare, health insurers are prohibited from charging higher premiums for individuals with pre-existing conditions. Trumpcare allows states to obtain waivers to allow insurers to charge more for people with pre-existing conditions who have a gap in coverage.” but for those “states that do obtain the waiver, they will be given $8 billion for people with pre-existing conditions who don’t maintain continuous coverage. The legislation also provides $130 billion that states could use for this purpose, or for expanding coverage and reduce costs in other ways.” Also, the new bill will change “Obamacare limited insurers to charging older adults a maximum of three times the rates charged to younger adults, but with Trumpcare will raise the ratio limit from three to five.”
A heavily debated topic in politics in America is on the distribution of Healthcare and health insurance. The main concern is the costs that come along with healthcare and who exactly it is or should be accessible to. Currently in the United States, our nation’s healthcare is under a plan called the Affordable Care Act, implemented by Barack Obama to which many nickname “Obamacare”. The ACA’s original goal was to cater to people of all classes and make it affordable, hence the name, but that plan has not proven to be very effective. However in recent times there has been a debate among presidential candidates of what action to take regarding healthcare including ideas such as a “single payer” system, or a universal healthcare plan as well as a flat tax.
The unemployment rate is 12.9% for those with less than a high school diploma, almost 5% higher than the national average. The rate for African American teens is an astounding 34.7%, which goes against a goal of ObamaCare, to help protect and create more equality in the workforce for women and minorities (Manhattan Institute). Yes, the intention of the President and his program are meant well, but is it really worth it to hurt so many tens of millions of Americans just for a miniscule benefit of a few? The implication ObamaCare could destroy the security of the economy
Health care should not be considered a political argument in America; it is a matter of basic human rights. Something that many people seem to forget is that the US is the only industrialized western nation that lacks a universal health care system. The National Health Care Disparities Report, as well as author and health care worker Nicholas Conley and Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP), strongly suggest that the US needs a universal health care system. The most secure solution for many problems in America, such as wasted spending on a flawed non-universal health care system and 46.8 million Americans being uninsured, is to organize a national health care program in the US that covers all citizens for medical necessities.