Summary Of Manifest Destiny And American Territorial Expansion

Manifest destiny was the belief that was created by John L. O'sullivan in the 1840. Manifest destiny consisted of three steps, the creation of manifest Destiny, the process of achieving manifest Destiny, and finally achieving Manifest Destiny. These are the three subjects that will be talked about in this article. Like I said in the previous Paragraph it was created by John L. O’sullivan when he wrote it in his article on Texas annexation and the dispute over the British Oregon trails. There were several diffrent way people used the word Manifest Destiny like the way John L. O'sullivan used it was he believed that “ majority of Americans at the time believed was their mission from God: to expand to west and bring the United States government to unenlightened people.”

Manifest Destiny is a term for the mentality common amid the nineteenth century time of American development that the United States could, as well as was bound to, extend across the nation. This state of mind powered western settlement, Native American evacuation and war with Mexico. Gen. Zachary Taylor needed to go to war with US. Which the name of this war is called "The Mexican War". Notwithstanding, US was not arranged for this fight and greater part of the officers of the US had political arrangements.

The concept of starting the Manifest Destiny was to expand their land and gain territory for their people. This proposal came from John Quincy Adams during the 1819 who wanted to lengthened the land to the pacific ocean to the Westward expansion but, it wasn’t until John O' Sullivan a newspaper editor published it during the 1940's had proclaimed it officially, giving it the name of the "Manifest Destiny." In the beginning two people went to explore the recently new land from the Louisiana Purchase. After two years, the Lewis and Clark Expedition was quite successful, they had found the pacific ocean. It was then later they decided to expand The Manifest Destiny was successful in gaining land but the consequences

However, because I believe that Manifest Destiny was not justified, the more dominant arguments are the land that was obtained by the United States using Manifest Destiny was not fairly acquired. According to the Signs of Opposition, “By sending U.S. troops to the Rio Grande, they argued, Polk had bullied a weaker neighbor into committing an act of aggression.” This quote is explaining how the United States acquired Texas. Polk’s method of getting Texas was unethical because not only were hundreds of innocent people killed, but the United States bullied Mexico into firing on them. It was an unjust way to secure their hold on Texas.

James K. Polk and the Expansionist Impulse by Sam W. Haynes Haynes’ biography of James K. Polk is a little bit different from the traditional biographical book with enumeration of important dates from life of historical figure. Instead the author takes different approach: while recounting development of Polk’s career, he looks at the Polk’s presidency through the lens of expansionism. Though he frames the 11th President as a strong adherent of aggressive territorial expansionism, Haynes also emphasises that Polk’s decisions cannot be separated from the political and social climate of his time. The author renders Polk from one side as the initiator of expansionists political moves, and from the other, as a product of contemporary social beliefs,

Manifest Destiny is what the mindset of the American people where in the 19th century, where in they believed in the expansion of American territory from coast to coast and that time, to the West. Although even as the early 1800s, Andrew Jackson led an army of men during the Florida crisis and conquered forts and cities. He also punished Indians who supported Spanish troops. The expansion was not only focused on territory but also to achieve freedom and economic stability for the people. There was territorial expansion.

What if hypocritical, selfish Americans took your rights, along with your land? Albert Gallatin, an American Senator from 1845, is a primary source that talks about the account of Manifest destiny (the belief that the expansion of the US throughout the American continents was both justified and inevitable,) as a negative. Indian Chief John Ross was stripped of his freedom as well as his land. Alexander Hamilton, one of the United State’s own founding fathers, bashed Thomas Jefferson on his decision, mentioning quote, “lucky coincidences and unexpected circumstances and not the result of any wise or thoughtful actions on the part of Jefferson’s administration.” Manifest destiny was an extremely negative event in the history of the United States.

During the 1840s, the number of Americans ventured west into Texas, Oregon, and California increased. The states consumed the sense that the destiny was to authorized a nation that can comprised both coasts. President Andrew Jackson had attacked to buy California for $3.5 million in the year of 1835; however, Mexico had rejected the offered from Jackson. The word “Manifest Destiny” means in the 19th century concept that the expansion of the United State throughout the American continents was both justified and inexorable. “Manifest Destiny” was used in the mid of 1840s, yet I believed I can still see evidence of attitude even before the phrase was used.

Manifest Destiny was the belief Americans had that they were destined to stretch from coast to coast. All throughout the 19th century, this attitude was enforced. To reach the goal of successful expansion, The United States tried to get all land possible. These territories were no easy task to achieve, however. Not only for America, but for the country on the other side of the agreement, it was difficult.

After the American Revolution and declaring its independence, America has been aspired to the ideas of liberty, humanity, equality, and property rights. In the 1840s, the United States added greatly to its territory, gaining lands stretching all the way to the Pacific Ocean. President James K. Polk, who was elected in 1844 on the pledge to annex vast territories in the West, delivered on his major campaign compromise. The term Manifest Destiny was a wide belief that the American settlers were destined to expand from coast to coast.

Manifest Destiny was the term used by John O’Sullivan to describe America’s desire to expand West due to reasons including both the vast amount of unclaimed land and the opportunities Americans wanted to explore. During this time, Americans believed that it was their God-given right to expand West, and therefore they were entitled to push away any groups that were in their way. Due to the mindset that the Americans could do as they pleased with the groups of people who got in their way, Manifest Destiny affected many groups of people, including the American Indians and Slaves, and continued to build up the preexisting tension between the North and South. One of the groups of people affected greatly by Manifest Destiny were the Native Americans. Manifest Destiny affected the American Indians by spreading foreign diseases to them as they moved Westward, through the Native American territory.

During the early 19th century, the United States of America was still growing into the mighty nation we know today. American pioneers set westward towards the Pacific ocean in search of new, fertile land. Unfortunately, as a result of this expansion, the native American population, which once covered the entire continent continued to be pushed into smaller and smaller areas. White Americans believed the diminishing population was simply an unavoidable result of the “Manifest Destiny”, an inevitable expansion of American land. This ideology was the cause of years of mistreatment of the nonwhites, especially Native Americans.

The Antebellum era was a period in history that marked the economic growth of the South. One of the things that gave rise to Manifest Destiny was the idea of territorial expansion. Manifest Destiny is the 19th-century doctrine or belief that the expansion of the U.S. throughout the American continents was both justified and inevitable. One person who showed belief in this idea of expanding territories was Martin Delany. Delany believed in the founding of a nation where formerly enslaved blacks could forge a homeland free from the discrimination that was universal in the United States.

The annexation of Texas occurred in the early 1800’s. American colonists were expanding into the Northern sector of the Rio Grande, which developed the need for Texas to become a part of the United States. In the South, the people supported the drive toward the annexation of Texas, but the Northerners opposed this idea. Texas was another slave state and the nature of their society did not appear appealing to the North.

In the 1800’s Manifest Destiny became a widely-held belief among settlers, their mentality was that they were destined to expand across North America pushing the natives out of their land. This attitude among western settlers fueled the removal of Native Americans and war with Mexico. The thinking of some of these settlers was both inevitable and justified by their God to expand and take more land with no limit. Geographically speaking, modern day America is the result of this “Manifest Destiny”. This was also happening around the time the United States experienced its second “Great Awakening”, which was another protestant religious revival movement happening in the early 19th century.