In the novel, Mister Death’s Blue Eyed Girls it has been proven throughout the story that before blaming someone, you should hear their side of the story. For example, in the book, Buddy Novak was continuously blamed for murdering Cheryl and Bobbi Jo, without knowing enough of Buddy’s side of the story. After Cheryl and Bobbi Jo had died, many people in the town assumed that the killer was Buddy because of the former affair that he had with Cheryl. Cheryl had told all of her friends that Buddy hit her and gave her a scar on her face (Hahn 12), but in truth, Cheryl’s dad had hit her for coming home too late. This caused people to believe that if Buddy is the type of person to abuse his girlfriend, he has to be the one who killed the two girls. In reality, Cheryl had just made that up as an excuse to break up with Buddy. Therefore, this shows that if one only heard …show more content…
For example, the morning before the murders, when Mister Death came to wake up his brother to get ready for the murders, he refused to go with him (Hahn 2). However, Mister Death forced him to come by making him believe that he had no choice but to help with the murders by saying “What somebody does to me, they do to you. That’s what being brothers mean. (Hahn 2)” In addition, Mister Death’s brother was extremely guilty and depressed because of what he had done. For example, he went to both Cheryl’s and Bobbi Jo’s funerals and viewings just so that he could see them for a final time (Hahn 143). By doing so, he not only put himself at risk of being arrested, but Mister Death was very mad at him for doing it. This shows that from his side of the story, Mister Death is the real murderer and his brother shouldn’t be taking as much of the blame. After the murders, Nora was also blamed for something that she shouldn’t have to take responsibility
James Baldwin : “Sonny's Blues” This character in Baldwin’s story, “Sonny’s Blues”, Sonny himself is having a battle within himself. This man deals with physical and emotional imprisonments occurring in his life making him in a sense free, but then again not. Whereas he deals with physically being locked up in prison and the other hand having his true main goal in a sense on a “hold” or even locked up for now. These prisons for this man are oppressing him from achieving what he really truly desires, he knows and has his goal in his hands, but he’s far from fully grasping onto it.
It’s not a question of how, but rather who? Who killed Andrew and Abby Borden? This is a question that has been asked for over 123 years. When they were brutally murdered in their home in Fall River Massachusetts. Andrew’s daughter Lizzie Borden was accused of the murders, but was eventually acquitted, and to this day the killer has not been found out (Tooley).
Every human being has been in a situation where they are challenged to go along with what other people say whether if it is right or wrong, rather than going along with their own perspective and doing what they feel is right, even though they may face consequences, that may or may not impact their relationships with their friends and family, and even their means of support. The movie Good Night, and Good Luck and The Crucible by Arthur Miller illustrates the danger of false accusations by going along with others in an attempt to educate the public by accusing others without any logic reasoning. The Crucible and Goodnight, and good luck both have themes of agitation and a lot of paranoia or madness. In the Crucible, the towns people are worried about the appearance of witches in their town and so they end up accusing other people of being witches.
We all have memories that make us cringe like nails on a chalkboard as they traverse our brain. The narrator read the article about Sonny and everything from the past came flooding back to him, “Sonny was wild, but he wasn’t crazy” (146) the narrator states in disbelief. Another example of this cringing feeling is near the end of “Sonny’s Blues” as the narrator elaborates “that trouble stretched above us, longer than the sky” (175). The narrator quotes this as he reminisces on the many years of suffering he and Sonny endured. Even though James Baldwin’s short story is spread in the span of a decade, the narrator can vividly remember the memories that make him recoil as he states “The same things happen, they’ll have the same thing to remember”
James Baldwin experienced two decades of successful writings in the mid-twentieth century, a time when racial tensions were high in the United States. Born in Harlem, Baldwin lived and adapted to the world of social and racial unrest; though most of us cannot understand these times, Baldwin shared through his writings the hardships many families endured. Baldwin reflects on this difficult time by writing a story titled “Sonny’s Blues”. This story is about two black brothers who are tormented with daily life and struggle to overcome the hopeless confines of the city.
Selfishness drives you to make unorthodox decisions. In the short story, The Scarlet Ibis by James Hurst, The author uses figurative expressions and images to make clear the relationship between a handicapable kid and his brother. Brother is extremely cruel to Doodle but he still seems to love Brother notwithstanding this. Brother cruelly pushes Doodle beyond his limits because he is embarrassed by having a disabled brother and is only concerned about his own feelings. The reason Doodle loves brother is because, despite Brother's anger, Doodle wants to impress his brother, Doodle Looks up to his brother, and Doodle doesn't understand the way he was being treated.
Should we be “Taking Refuge in “How:” Dissecting the Motives Behind Cholly’s Rape in The Bluest Eye”. Rebecca Andrews talks about the actions of cholly is the bluest eye are unacceptable but understandable. In the The Bluest Eye by Toni Morrison, Cholly, one of the main characters rapes his daughter Pecola. Now in this article by Rebecca Andrews, she talks about how the events in the past of Cholly are the reasons why he raped his daughter. The actions that happen in the past are do not explain what we do in the future; it may impact the choices we make but in the end it comes down to our choices.
Cheryl then returns to her parents’ home, under her mother and father’s care. After a few weeks, she realizes that life goes on. She begins to start to take care of herself, and the family begins to restart Cheryl’s life. My personal opinion on this scene is that Cheryl was being somewhat dramatic. While this caused Cheryl’s career to suffer for a temporary period of time, she easily could’ve gone to school and done something else for a
How does one live with oneself knowing they are the reason for killing an innocent boy? In Bleachers, John Girsham, Eddie Rake did not intentionally kill Scotty Reardon; he is still the primary reason for his death. Rake got so caught up in winning, and with football he did not care how brutal, or long, the practices were. After Scotty’s death, Rake would spend the rest of his life regretting killing Scotty, and how he treated the rest of his boys. For the rest of his life, Eddie Rake would work hard to have the people of Messina forgive him, and to forgive himself.
A boy walk through the jungle with each step he feels pebble of sweat dripping off his back down to his leg. He walks pass the same banana tree five without notice. Then he sees a pair of eye looking at him glowing through the bushes. He squint in disbelief, the eyes grow larger the boy take a step back tripping over a branch he falls to the floor as he looks up he sees a panther looking over him, he is stun. The panther paw press on his neck it leans in and opens its jaw wide to engorge the first taste.
In Ida B. Wells’ works Southern Horrors: Lynch Law in All Its Phases and A Red Record, Ida B. Wells argues against the lynching of African Americans of the time. Wells’ uses many strategies and techniques to make her arguments as convincing as possible throughout her works. She also uses clear language and well-structured sentences to make it clear what she is arguing. Ida B. Wells makes sure to use statistics and offers rebuttals to the opposing side’s point of view to strengthen her argument. Wells presents these arguments by isolating and clearly stating the problem, giving descriptive and specific examples, using statistics, and offering rebuttals.
“...We often take responsibility in a way that goes beyond what we can reasonably be held responsible for”(Sherman 154), says Nancy Sherman in “The Moral Logic of Survivor Guilt.” Sherman believes that people blame themselves too much when something goes wrong in a dangerous situation; and even when something happens that is out of their control, they cannot forgive themselves for the outcome of the event. Should people in life-or-death situations be held accountable for their actions? Someone might argue that people should take responsibility for what they do, even in survival mode. However, in life-or-death situations, people should not accuse other, and make them feel remorse for their actions, because, in survival mode, a person wants to save themselves before anyone else.
No matter what crime and it 's motive, they should still be regulated and justified. For this instance, Mrs. Patrick Maloney of "Lamb to the Slaughter" is guilty of murdering her own husband. Why would she do such a thing if she loved her husband so much? This leads to one of many points: Mrs. Maloney 's actions decided on impulse.
James Baldwin’s “Sonny’s Blue’s” makes great use of different literary devices throughout the story. The author utilizes conflict, symbolism, and the narrator’s point of view to give the story a deeper meaning and significance to the story. Sonny’s Blue’s is about an older brother’s relationship and differences with his younger brother, Sonny.
This world is plagued with poverty, diseases, and drugs yet the most destructive is selfishness. People think the way they want, people live the way they want, and people make decisions the way they want, all of which could be acceptable if only they took other people into their thoughts, lives, and decisions. Although it is true that human nature provokes the self-indulgence out of people, every person is capable of thinking about the other person. Throughout the novel, Night, Wiesel writes about the constant suffering during the Holocaust that caused the Jews to be self-indulgent, similarly, Rosenthal describes a murder in the article “Thirty-Eight Witnesses: New Excerpt” where thirty-eight witnesses go without telling the real story, and