Monster, a novel written by Walter Dean Meyers, tells of a young black kid named Steve Harmon and his experiences and feelings he encounters during his stay in jail. Steve is on trial for being “the lookout” of a robbery gone wrong, which resulted in the death of the storeowner, Mr. Nesbitt. The man responsible for the death of Mr. Nesbitt was James King who actually pulled the trigger to end Mr. Nesbitt’s life. Yet, Steve is on trial for felony murder for being the so-called “look out”. Steve should not be held responsible for a crime he did not commit. First, Steve who was said to be the lookout was supposed to give King and “Bobo” Evans (the two robbers) “a signal”. However no signal was given. Second there is no evidence Steve had any …show more content…
The signal was supposed to give King and Evans the all clear sign so there would be no witnesses to the robbery. Despite the fact Steve did not give them a signal the store was not “all clear”. There was a woman inside of the store at the same time Steve was apparently scoping out the store to make sure the coast was clear. A lookouts one and only job is to make sure the store is empty, if Steve was the apparent “lookout” wouldn’t he have gave King and Evans some signal to tell them the coast was not clear? Also Steve received no sort of payment for being the “lookout”. King and Evans both got a cut of the stolen goods in fact everyone but Steve got a cut. That leaves the only explanation to be King and Evans simply needed someone to take down with them and Steve happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong …show more content…
Steve admits to having casual conversations with King when he saw him around. King, a violent criminal with a record, tries to say the he and Steve spoke of the robbery and Steve agreed to participate. However, Steve, a kind hearted, scared young boy with no record, denies ever speaking with King about the robbery. Steve is a good kid who hardly gets into trouble; Steve’s film teacher George Sawicki backs up this fact. Mr. Sawicki defends Steve and Steve’s character on the stand, which helped the jury realize Steve’s innocence. Mr. Sawicki refers to Steve as “talented, bright, and compassionate”. Throughout the book you learn a lot about Steve and one thing you learn is how Steve is just like any other 16 year old. He just wants to grow up regularly and follow his passion, which is making
Stark noticed the Officer Safety issue with interviewing the Victim in front of the door, and asked him to move to the side away from the flow of pedestrian traffic. Stark spoke with the Officer that had responded prior to our arrival and got the information that the Officer had already obtained. Stark re-interviewed the Victim, and come to the conclusion that the crime elements of PC211 were not met. I asked Stark what he believed the crime was, he stated PC 484 - petty theft. Stark gave the Victim a business card with the report number.
This was never fully proven, yet King says “I need to get paid, man. I ain’t got nothing between my butt and the ground but a rag” (Myers 50). Steve responds with “I hear that” (Myers 50). This shows the reader that they both needed money and were willing to do something for money. This proves that if Steve participated in the robbery, he would have been compensated, but he never was.
In the courtroom Steve had some troubles with a lot of racism and prejudice. Steve decided to go on the stand to prove his point otherwise they wouldn't believe him and the task wasn’t that easy but somehow he managed. The jury saw him through and he was claimed not guilty. His lawyer O’Brien wasn’t that happy in fact we think that she thought he was actually
Steve Harmon, a young adult, was accused of felony murder. This shows that even a young kid who has been accused, although may or may not be proven guilty, is held to be a monster. Steve is terrified throughout the whole situation. He is completely inexperienced and does not feel he played a huge role in the actual robbery. He was pressured as the “lookout.
Steve was the look out in the robbery but was not responsible for Mr. Nesbitt’s death because him and his friends were talking about the robbery before it even happened, he lied under oath, however he wasn't even in the store when it happened. First off the reason why Steve is guilty is because him and his friends were talking about the robbery before it even happened. (
He went on stand and when asked about where he was, or what he was doing he gave clear answers. Meanwhile, in Monster Steve never stated whether or not he was innocent. When Steve was on stand he answered most questions with “I don’t remember or I don’t know. I found it odd,but the author left Steve’s innocence up to the reader as if they were the jury, taking all the evidence. Brenton’s lawyers also strongly believed he was innocent while Steve’s lawyer didn’t believe he was innocent “I know she (Ms.O’Brien) thinks I’m guilty”-Steve Pg(138).
I believe that Steve Harmon is innocent. There are many reasons to believe this. For one “bobo” Evans placed him at the crime scene but Mr. Evans and Mr. King according to Mr. Evans testimony were on drugs. So Steve Harmon could have just happened to be their. Since both Mr. Evans and Mr. King were on drugs i don’t believe that their statements are valid.
So, it wouldn’t make sense if Steve was inside the store with them as his job was already done. Make your community a safer place to live for yourself and others by making smart decisions and choosing friends or anyone you associate with,
James King said he did not kill Mr. Nesbitt, so who killed Mr. Nesbitt? Steve’s fate is on the line. Many say that he did not kill Mr. Nesbitt, but who ever said that is absolutely erroneous. To start, Steve said that he was not in the drugstore on December 22nd but then in his journal he said that he walked in the drugstore and looked for some mints which makes me think that maybe Steve was trying to protect himself by saying that he was not in there at the time even if he did not shoot the man but if he told them that he was in there to grab some mints then they would see him as a bigger suspect, “ What did I do? I
Guilty! Most defense attorney believe in the principle that says,’ better 10 guilty go free than even one possibly innocent person being convicted’. In the novel Monster by Walter Dean Myers, Steve Harmon is a 16 year old boy from Harlem, New York that was accused of being a look out for a robbery. This robbery resulted in the killing of the of the owner, Mr.Nesbitt, and became a felony murder. Steve is put on trial that could result in 25 years to life in prison if he was guilty.
He depends on others to bring clarity to his mind, such as saying, “What did I do?”. After the session at court was finished, Steve was insecure about what Ms. O’Brien, his lawyer, thinks of him. He writes an entry about it: “Who was Steve Harmon? I wanted to open my shirt and tell her to look into my heart to see who I was, who the real Steve Harmon”(92). During the trial, Ms. O’Brien stays distant from him.
“Don 't be afraid of losing people. Be afraid of losing yourself by trying to please everyone around you. "~ Lewis Howes. In the novel Monster by Walter Dean Myers, we are introduced to Steve Harmon, a sixteen-year-old dark-skinned boy who is the narrator of the book.
Steve is a bad person because there was a robbery he knew was going to happen and didn’t tell anyone and let someone get killed so he is a monster. Also,Petrocelli giving her speech and saying Steve was involved with the robbery. The book said,“‘ The man who was to enter the store and check it out is sitting at the other table. His name is Steven Harmon. ”’(Myers
Perceptions from others can be cruel. Criminals are often thought of negatively by themselves and are also disrespected by others in society. The novel Monster presents the impressions people have about Steve Harmon, an accused criminal on trial for robbery and murder. Furthermore, the text explains Steve’s views of himself during and after time in prison from first person point-of-view. The novel Monster by Walter Dean Myers highlights the various perceptions that exist about an accused criminal.
As Steve got into school he did not enjoy school he was never a strait A kid. The things he does like where swimming and pranking. He planned a secret bring your pet to school day