In the 2015 book, Notorious RBG: The Life and Times of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Irin Carmon and Shana Knizhnik evaluate the significant role Ginsburg has had to United States policy on equality and women’s rights. The authors of Notorious RBG, present the structured internal initiative and personal influences of Ginsburg, that contributed to her life-long achievement in academics and scholarly enlightenment. Carmon and Knizhnik describe how Ginsburg juggled her professional aspirations and family life while continuing to present the legal world with arguments that aided in shifting popular opinion about female equality compared to males in our society. In Notorious RBG, Ginsburg’s meticulous and tireless devotion to cases for the Women’s Project …show more content…
She had lived and experienced the fate of an individual based on their sex, something no one could control, but certainly had to live with. After reading Notorious RBG, I was able to understand the immense progression in equality for gender in U.S. history; Ruth Bader Ginsburg was a key factor in the longevity of women’s rights. In the book, Carmon and Knizhnik delve into the calculating and strategic part of Ginsburg’s mind, she looked at the ramifications of pregnancy as being related to a woman’s freedom, and how gender bias affected a large untapped group of Americans. Our society had fostered a sub-status stigma to females while deeming male’s superior. Ginsburg also envisioned a world in which gender didn’t affect any citizen’s dream or goal. I do not see her as a feminist, rather, I see her as a person who contests that each sex is able to participate on a level playing ground. Not only does she deem equal treatment of women fair, she also cares that men are able to be seen equal to a woman. The authors write of Ginsburg’s view of equality, and they show the reader why Ginsburg’s outlook can be concluded as a non-gender bias ideal of equality. Reported as Ginsburg’s favorite client, Wisenfel gave her the opportunity to contended that a male be treated equally to a woman. She won her argument that a male should benefit from their deceased wife’s Social Security fund. Carmon and …show more content…
The average view of a culture impacts each person who is part of it. Ginsburg was no different in that regard, but she used her experiences as reminders and lessons to teach newer generations about having an awareness regarding equality. Carmon and Knizhnik evaluate the importance of everyday normal life during Ginsburg’s upbringing, they set the tone for life in the United States for the generation of Americans born in the 1930s. The authors elaborate on the average response to racial discrimination, religious discrimination, intermingling, and the expectations our society continually put on the female gender. Ginsburg, growing up in Brooklyn, can recount her memories of living in a community where the Catholics and Jews didn’t intermingle, or go to the same schools. Among the other factors preventing a diverse and well developed utopia, the taboo of socializing with people of different religious backgrounds and the sub-status affiliation the female gender was awarded, would have had a lasting and ingrained effect on Ginsburg as a Jewish woman. Naturally, Ginsburg was bound to look at equality for all as the ideal to what America should strive for. The psychological presence that shaped a person, knowing full well there must be a better option than that type of thinking is profound. As Carmon and
Knauer, Christine. “Equal Rights Amendment (ERA).” Encyclopedia of Women and American Politics. By Lynne E. Ford. 2015 ed.
Born in 1949 and raised in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Elizabeth Warren describes her childhood as “typically middle class” . Later in life, Elizabeth Warren was appointed by the United States Senate in 2008 to chair the Congressional Oversight Panel after many years as a professor of bankruptcy law at Harvard University. Now serving as the senior senator of Massachusetts, Elizabeth Warren has been a prominent female figure from within the Democratic Party since 2012. Her authority in politics has been noticeably impactful as Time Magazine has even named Warren one of the Time’s 100 Most Influential People in the World twice, and the National Law Journal named her one of the Most Influential Lawyers of the Decade. Recently, on September 21,
In James W. Loewen’s “Handicapped by History,” the author exposes the broken nature of what we are taught in history classes in the Cultural Memory vs. Historical Reality framework. Students only hear of Helen Keller’s struggle to learn to read and write and are never taught of her strong humanitarian and socialist beliefs. In the case of Woodrow Wilson, history books often let his efforts during WWI overshadow his white supremacist beliefs and his schemes to overthrow governments in South American countries. Loewen explains why history books tend to create fairytale-like images of American heroes: “We seem to feel that a person like Helen Keller can be an inspiration only so long as she remains uncontroversial, one-dimensional. We don 't want complicated icons” (Loewen 35).
Final Essay Social policy’s main purpose is to ensure the wellbeing of humans. This policy includes various topics such as civil rights, gun policy, recreational drug use, and even women’s rights. (Social Policy, n.d.). The broadness of the social policy causes an array of opposing opinions, especially between the Democratic and Republican party. For example, Democrats believe homosexuals should have equal rights to heterosexuals.
“At the beginning of the twentieth century, women were outsiders to the formal structures of political life—voting, serving on juries, holding elective office—and they were subject to wide-ranging discrimination that marked them as secondary citizens” (Evans). The lack of rights for women during the early 1900s was a severe problem that motivated Susan Glaspell to publish a short story “A Jury of Her Peers.” During the early nineteenth century, women endured cruel and unjust treatment from men and had limited options in their careers, as well as political and social lives. Glaspell conveys the serious oppression of women in the beginning of the twentieth century through the presence of gender inequality, symbolism of a songbird, and hidden evidence. Written in the early 1900s, “A Jury of Her Peers” was originally a play, Trifles, which Glaspell decided to turn into a short story in 1917, only a year later.
This article discusses the idea of a double- bind that is connected between gender norms and politics. There is a difference between the gender stereotypes of woman and politicians. While connecting this article to the book Unbought & Unbossed one can look at Shirley Chisholm and the traits that she shows throughout the memoir. One can say that Shirley Chisholm would belong more in the agentic category. This is because she was ambitious about making a change not only for woman but for woman of color, she was playing a boys game and never thought of anything from the perspective of her gender or race.
Margaret Fuller fights for equality in her essay The Great Lawsuit. She discusses the idea that women are equal in every way to men and deserve the rights that men get just by being born male. Fuller’s argument shares a lot of similarities with Emerson’s idea of self-reliance. She discusses the idea of one universal order, and the notion of leaving the past in the past so as to move forward, although Fuller does share some ideas with Emerson, her essay held a different meaning of self-reliance for women than it did for men. Margaret Fuller adopts Emerson’s idea of one universal order, and claims that “if the woman apparelled in flesh, to one master only are they accountable.
The world has developed in many areas such as in gender, sexual, and racial rights. Shirley Chisholm stands as one of these individuals in history that has paved a path to equality. Her Presidential bid, delivered on January 25, 1972, is one moment cemented in history. This paper will analyze that speech by examining her pathos, logos, and ethos. Pathos is Greek for an appeal of emotion.
The Rhetorical Strategies of a Latina Judge's Speech To End the Lack of Representation Throughout the diversity in the United States, there is a multitude of factors that underestimate and terminate the presence or idea of women and minorities in government roles. In current times, awareness of gender equality and excluded minorities has rose to an all- time high. Many are advocating that the way our country sees and treats intersectionality needs to change for the better. Judge Sonia Sotomayor is an advocator by spreading this public announcement through a piece of a speech. She discusses the obstacles she and other minorities face to place higher on the social ladder and to be represented during a speech at the Judge Mario G. Olmos Memorial
Necessitate Equality Using the two of Anita Hill’s books, “Reimagining Equality” And “Speaking Truth To Power” I’m highlighting Hill’s most important value: necessitating equality. Hill was a former lawyer and now a professor that went from a private citizen to an internationally respected gender equality activist for speaking up about Clarence Thomas. In the book “Reimagining Equality” Hill talks about the real “American home” and how the world isn’t legitimately equal (gender, race, sex, etc.) and talks a little about the Anita Hill v. Clarence Thomas incident, but not hastily and emphasizes the importance and difference, equality makes in the world and highlights all the lows it brings. The other book that was chosen “Speaking Truth To Power”,
In her speech, “For the Equal Rights Amendment” Shirley Chisholm addresses her views on securing women’s equality to ensure women have better opportunities. She is an American politician, educator and author that became the first black woman elected to the United States Congress. Chisholm supports her claims about equal rights for women by using examples of statistics to prove a point. Her purpose is to persuade her audience that women in America are neglected by equal rights and excluded from things that men are not. Throughout her deliverance she expressed an inspiring and informative tone to uplift her audience so that Congress can make a change for women.
The case of Bradwell v. Illinois in 1873 illustrated an injustice of discrimination based on gender. Myra Bradwell was a married woman who worked for her husband’s law office. She was wealthy and educated, as evident by her ability to run a weekly, legal newspaper. Bradwell was recommended to become a lawyer and thus applied for a license to practice law in Illinois in 1869. Despite her qualifications, the Supreme Court of Illinois denied her application on the basis that she was female.
It would hard for the women in the current 21st century to step into the shoes of their predecessors, a time before the women’s movement when women had few rights, their opinions were of miniscule value. In Susan Glaspell’s short story “A Jury of Her Peers” she illustrates to readers a time when men were more controlling of women, viewed themselves as superior, and the abuse and mental decline of Minnie Wright that led her to murder. Kathleen Wilson explains, “Much of the tension in “A Jury of Her Peers” results from what the women understand and what the men are blind to”. Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale were able to determine Minnie’s state of mind from the kitchens’ condition, as the kitchen was wife’s domain. The men mock the messy kitchen and
and Berland Associates from November of 2008, states that the majority of people in the United States view the treatment of women at home as equal to men, whereas in the press, workplace, political settings, or the armed forces, treatment does not remain equivalent in treatment (Scherer 26). Progress has made steady yet gradual milestones towards the goal regarding women’s rights, but when it comes to the question of when dramatic change should take place, “the time is now”
On this date, President Clinton spoke at the Rose Garden at the White House to give a speech about Ruth Ginsburg and the qualities that made Clinton choose her for the role of the next justice. Clinton spoke very highly of both Ginsburg’s achievements and intelligence. He said even this, “If, as I believe, the measure of a person 's values can best be measured by examining the life the person lives, then Judge Ginsburg 's values are the very ones that represent the best in America. I am proud to nominate this path-breaking attorney, advocate, and judge to be the 107th Justice to the United States Supreme Court.” (Clinton, William, Remarks