Summary Of Santobello V. New York, 404 US
Case Brief
Case title: Santobello V. New York, 404 U.S 257 (1971)
Facts: Santobello was indicted with two felonies and plead guilty to a lesser offense after negotiating with the prosecutor. The offense that he did plead guilty had a maximum sentence to only a year in jail, which was less than the original two felonies, and the prosecutor at the time said he wouldn’t recommend anything to the judge. However, a different prosecutor took over the case and did end up recommending the maximum sentence. The defendant’s, Santobello’s, attorney objected and told the judge of the deal that the former prosecutor made a deal to not recommend sentencing, but the judge said that no one influenced him and that the he believed the maximum one year sentence was appropriate based on Santobello’s criminal record. Therefore, Santobello was sentenced to a year in jail. Santobello tried to recant his guilty plea since the promise from the former prosecutor was not valid, but his request was denied. Then he tried to make an appeal to the court but the court decided that the just because a prior promise didn’t happen, didn’t
…show more content…
Yes.
Court Decision: The U.S Supreme court remanded it back to the court in New York and let them decide.
Holding: When the defendant enters a plea of guilt under a plea bargain and the court accepts it, it is the civil right of the defendant for the agreement under the bargain to be enforced. If what is stated in the plea bargain isn’t kept, it’s up to the court to decide whether or not the prosecution is required to enforce the agreement or if the defendant can have the opportunity to take back the plea of guilt. In this case, the broken agreement was enough to allow the defendant to take back his plea and go back to court for a new
Case Study Of Danny Ecobedo V. Illinois Supreme Court Cases
527 Words | 3 PagesThe case involved an individual by the name of Danny Escobedo, who was arrested on January 19, 1960, for the murder of his brother-in-law. Escobedo was arrested without a warrant and interrogated; he did not make any statement to the police and was released after contacting his lawyer. On January 30, Benedict DiGerlando, told the police about Escobedo’s involvement in the crime that Escobedo “had fired the fatal shots” (Escobedo v. Illinois- Supreme Court Cases: The Dynamic Court, 1999, pg.2). He was later arrested a second time and taken to the police headquarters. Soon enough Escobedo requested to have “advice from my lawyer”
State Of New York V. Jorgensen Case Brief
1680 Words | 7 PagesPeople of the State of New York v. Jennifer Jorgensen was criminal court case that went to the Court of Appeals in New York. Judge Pigott gives his/her opinion. Jennifer Jorgensen was 34 weeks on the date of the crime. Defendant was under the influenced of both drugs and alcohol. Jorgensen was driving under the influence on Whiskey Road in Suffolk County.
Tejay Johnson Case Study
718 Words | 3 PagesThe defenses’ argument was to let Johnson only sever for 15 years in exchange. Goldman proposed to have the court consider the appeal before the sentence claiming that it would “cause irreparable harm to his client.” As well as the other attorney’s representing the others who were arrested had them “not guilty pleas on their behalf and called the six-figure bails excessive (Bichao).” The other members that were also caught in relation to the robberies weren’t treated as harsh than
Supreme Court Case Analysis Of Kelo Vs. New London
1058 Words | 5 PagesAnalysis of Kelo vs. New London The unpopular Supreme Court decision of Kelo vs. New London has broken many citizens trust in having secured property rights. In Kelo vs. New London, the City of New London was condemning the property of several homeowners, in order to sell the land to private developers that would use the land to make a retail condo development. The local government approved the new development in order to gain higher tax revenue and to bring more jobs to the area. Homeowners who believed that their waterfront residence was being unfairly taken contested the City’s actions in court.
Pennsylvania Board Of Parole V. Scott Summary
1002 Words | 5 PagesCase Analysis In the court case, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole v. Scott, 524 US. 357 (1998), the defendant was not allowed to obtain any weapons while on parole. In 1983, Scott pleaded ‘nolo contendere’, which means that he doesn’t wish to contend or agree to the guilty charge, to third degree murder. He was sentenced ten to twenty years to prison.
Case Summary: Brady Vs. Maryland, 373 US
993 Words | 4 PagesCase Summary Part 1 The prosecution is legally bound to disclose to the defense evidence that is favorable to the defendant. Three examples of the prosecutor’s obligations to disclose evidence are Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), and United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). According to Rule 3.8, “the prosecutor must make timely disclosure to the defense of all evidence or information known to the prosecutor that tends to negate the guilt of the accused or mitigates the offense, and, in connection with sentencing, disclose to the defense and to the tribunal all unprivileged mitigating information known to the prosecutor, except when the prosecutor is relieved of this responsibility by
What Is The Most Famous Trial Of Paul Bernanrdo And Karla Hamolka Case
1125 Words | 5 PagesThis is where the controversy comes; Karla was as much guilty as Paul or even more according to some people, but the prosecutors could do nothing because in exchange for plea barging she testified crucial evidence. The prosecutors said that they would have never agreed to the plea bargain if they had seen the tapes. However, the plea bargain received a lot of criticisms from Canadians. A lot of questions were raised, where comes the limit to the use of plea bargain? Did the prosecutors do enough digging before turning to the plea bargain
Blasio Case: Jail V. New York City
116 Words | 1 PagesThe 5 who had been jail sued New York City in 2003 for malicious prosecution. They also included racial discrimination, and emotional distress in the law suits. The city refused to settle the suits for a decade under then-Mayor Michael Bloomberg. It is hard for the city to say we mess up on an grand scale because the city 's lawyers felt they would win. However, after Bill de Blasio became Mayor and supported the settlement.
Harry Robinson V Seaway Volkswagen Case Brief
438 Words | 2 PagesWilliam A. Flores BUL – 5332 FACTS: Harry Robinson and his family decided to move from Massena, New York, a small town on the St. Lawrence Seaway to Tucson, Arizona. Kay was driving the 1976 Audi 100 LS that she and Harry bought from Seaway Volkswagen in Massena to Tucson, Arizona when accident transpired just a few miles outside Tulsa County in Creek County, Oklahoma. A car behind them crashed into the rare side of the Audi and immediately started a fire in the area over the back seat after they got hit. The blazed spread quickly over the rare seat, and the inside of the car got rapidly hot.
Defendant's 46-Month Sentence
1085 Words | 5 PagesI. FACTUAL HISTORY On August 16, 2011, Defendant pled guilty for conspiracy to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. There were no disputed facts at the time of the sentencing. A Presentence Investigation Report was conducted, by the Probation Office, to identify ameliorating
Robert Brady Was Pled Not Guilty
155 Words | 1 PagesIn 1959, Robert Brady was charged with kidnapping, which inflicted capital punishment if convicted by the jury. Brady first pled not guilty, but once he learned that his partner in crime agreed to plead guilty and testify against Brady, he later changed his plea of not guilty, to guilty. Brady’s plea was accepted, after being questioned on his voluntariness of the plea, and was sentenced to 50 years in prison, which was later lessened to 30 years. Afterwards, in 1967, Brady requested post-conviction relief stating that under 28 U.S.C 2255, “his guilty plea was not voluntarily given because 1201 (a) persuaded his plea from his counsel… also that the trial judge had not complied with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Brady v.
Plea Bargaining In The Criminal Justice System
987 Words | 4 PagesThe United States criminal justice system is riddled with cases of many varieties. Some have obvious outcomes while others warrant more detailed analysis. However, some cases go beyond the court into other courts, where they are decided, such as Jackson versus Hobbs in 2012. The courts try to lighten the load of cases they have by offering plea bargaining, an agreement among a defendant and a prosecutor in which the defendant pleads guilty to a charge that is less severe than what he or she is initially charged for in the hopes that clemency will be administered. Sometimes, however, people accused of a crime are completely innocent, and it is not until technology is released, such as DNA testing, decades later that these people are proved to
Reformer's Unanimous Case Study
454 Words | 2 PagesHe appealed the ruling in 2014. He claimed that according to his lawyers, if he pled guilty, he would only
Pros And Cons Of Exclusionary Rule
966 Words | 4 PagesThe Exclusionary rule in the United States constitutional law simply states that any evidence taken from people with forced, shall not be allowed in court. Any evidence taken in an illegal search and seizure may not be used in court. The United State Supreme Court in conjunction with maintain the sole of the Constitution uses a combination of the fourth, fifth, sixth and even the fourteenth amendment to keep true the heart of “good faith" and the “fruit of the poisonous tree" or the exclusionary rule (Teacher, 2013). It will be prudent to understand these amendments, to how apply them. The Fourth Amendment main intentional creation to protect citizens from illegal searches and seizures.
More about Summary Of Santobello V. New York, 404 US
Case Study Of Danny Ecobedo V. Illinois Supreme Court Cases
527 Words | 3 PagesState Of New York V. Jorgensen Case Brief
1680 Words | 7 PagesTejay Johnson Case Study
718 Words | 3 PagesSupreme Court Case Analysis Of Kelo Vs. New London
1058 Words | 5 PagesPennsylvania Board Of Parole V. Scott Summary
1002 Words | 5 PagesCase Summary: Brady Vs. Maryland, 373 US
993 Words | 4 PagesWhat Is The Most Famous Trial Of Paul Bernanrdo And Karla Hamolka Case
1125 Words | 5 PagesBlasio Case: Jail V. New York City
116 Words | 1 PagesHarry Robinson V Seaway Volkswagen Case Brief
438 Words | 2 PagesDefendant's 46-Month Sentence
1085 Words | 5 PagesRobert Brady Was Pled Not Guilty
155 Words | 1 PagesPlea Bargaining In The Criminal Justice System
987 Words | 4 PagesReformer's Unanimous Case Study
454 Words | 2 PagesPros And Cons Of Exclusionary Rule
966 Words | 4 PagesJustice In Plato's Republic
221 Words | 1 Pages