Jane Jacobs begins part three of her book based on forces of decline and regeneration. Chapter thirteen is established on “the self-destruction of diversity”. Jacobs introduction to the chapter is on her observations and conclusions that, “ in our American cities, we need all kinds of diversity, intricately mingled in mutual support.” She then explains that this is needed so that city life can work in a decent and constructive manner and that people will be able to sustain their society and civilization. People of the public do have the responsibility through the uses of some of the enterprises such as parks, museums, schools, community centers. However, an individual city resident and various private organizations, create city diversity with their own diverse contributions. What the city planners should provide is a structure for these different uses.
Jacobs describes four forces that tend to destroy diversity. It must be noted that first, diversity can simply destroy itself. When an area becomes too favored, competition will arise
…show more content…
The single uses form borders in cities, with a classic example that railroad tracks do also. It is not the social aspect that we should be concerned with but the physical and functional effects of borders on their immediate city surroundings. There may sometimes be a blight in areas that are neighboring to the tracks just like sometimes in areas that are along the waterfront. According to Jacobs, usually it is worse and there is more of it along the waterfronts than along the tracks. The neighborhoods that are around big city universities, civic centers, large hospital groups and parks are apt to be stagnant- a condition that precedes decay. The main trouble with borders is that they are apt to form dead ends for most users of city streets that for most people represent
This chapter examined how different white residents viewed diversity as some viewed it as positive and negative. It also examines day to day interactions between white and non-white residents. On one hand, whites were attracted to the diversity in Creekridge Park but others see diversity as a negative effect of affordable housing. Other than those two views, some people moved to Creekridge Park simply because they were attracted to its taste instead of because it had positive economic benefits. I found that this chapter addressed the main point of this because it explained interracial relations by exploring what members of the neighborhood thought about diversity.
The book argues that by promoting inclusivity and diversity, social differences cannot stand in the way of ethnic groups interacting in positive ways. Some other key themes in The Cosmopolitan Canopy include the importance of diversity and inclusivity; the role of public spaces in promoting social cohesion; the challenges of creating a cosmopolitan canopy in different urban settings; and the need for people to interact with those who are different from themselves in order to reduce social tensions and promote understanding. In addition, Anderson utilizes folk ethnography to explore the dynamics of public spaces in different urban settings, and to understand how people from different backgrounds interact with each other in these
Urban areas had unprecedented growth due to immigration and migration from the south due to high industrial growth. Urban political bosses were losing some of their power due to political corruption exposed by “Muckraking” journalist of the day. They hoped progress would be possible by an informed public. However, activist Irene Sargent saw a sense of civic pride instrumental in encouraging the desire for an informed and engaged urban community.
Borderlands are referred to as the geographical, political, cultural, and social areas that exist at the boundaries of different nations, regions, or cultures. These areas are characterized by complexity and hybridity where people and communities display different identities, languages, and traditions. Borderlands are often portrayed as physical, symbolic, or imagery and are deemed by issues including migration, social injustice, and displacement. Borderlands are central to the Chicano identity and experiences. Transnationalism refers to the movement of people's ideas and cultural practices across national borders; it is a term that challenges ideas of nation-states as fixed and bounded entities and instead portrays the interconnectedness and
Mr. Brook mentions that the white people, Africa-Americans and other people of various races live separately in their areas based on their income levels and interests. As Mr. Brook’s statement, I believe that there are much talks about the issue of diversity in America, however, diversity has not been taken seriously because Americans
Yet severe inequality remained the most visible feature of the urban landscape, and persistent labor strife raised a new question of the urban landscape, combating social inequality.” (“Give me Liberty” Pg.
After recent protests in Baltimore, Badger (2016) explores the nature of policies set in the early 1900’s that have shaped the city of Baltimore, and that continue to have an effect on their quality of life. Actions such as redlining and urban renewal have perpetuated poverty and segregation in the same neighborhoods today as 75 year ago. This article calls attention to the effect of system-wide race discrimination in Baltimore, and how policies create a cyclical link between race and disadvantage in communities. Racial disparities across many subsystems have created a system of race discrimination in which it’s emergent effects implant uber discrimination into our culture and institutions (Reskin, 2012). Reskin (2012) explains how emergent discrimination intensifies disparities within each subsystem and creates systems of race discrimination.
The new development in progression today shows the idea of how marketable land around the city is and how diverse neighborhoods cause for better funding and better relationships between people of different ethnicities and cultures. Even though the Chicago Race Riots was a negative event, over the years its effects became positive. As a result of all the looting and burning down businesses, it gave the developers a chance to integrate new business ideas and housing plans to help advance the community in the future. This is one of the major historical events used today as a lesson taught to students to eliminate
The richness of El Paso, Texas relies on the vast diversity observed in each one of its citizens, which has opened the way for El Paso to develop as a multicultural city. Emigration has been one of the main factors that has diversified El Paso’s cultural background, citizens from all over the world have landed a foot over American territory and have made it theirs, several nationalities, several races, one community, one El Paso. Emigration has also caused the expansion of a plethora of traditions across the area, which has made El Paso’s culture an indispensable resource of the state of Texas. A diverse country, state or city is the one that values the difference in people and therefore recognizes that people with different backgrounds,
Anderson begins the section by explaining that there are two separate cultures in inner-city neighborhoods. The first are the “decent” this group is defined by commitment to “middle-class values,” (101). However, they are not mainstream in that they
There has to be a realistic solution that can be put into motion to benefit everyone involved. Referring again to his article “Is Gentrification All Bad?” Davidson argues that urban renewal, if done right, is not a monstrous custom that it is painted to be; nevertheless, he reasons that gentrification depends on who does it, how they do it, and why they do it. As a resident in New York, a city where gentrification is as widespread as the common cold in winter, Davidson speculates that those who go into a neighborhood with the intention to renovate houses, or abandoned buildings ought to have a good reason for it. The author points out that “Gentrification does not have to be something that one group inflicts on another…” (Davidson 349), rather, he suggests that everyone, the gentrifiers and the locals, be on the same page when it comes to developing their
In this speech, I will begin by explaining what gentrification is along with a short background on the Lincoln Park gentrification, then I will proceed to explain how the families in these areas fought for their homes, and finally I will be discussing the gentrification that is affecting citizens of Chicago today. Body I. Gentrification is the process of renovating an area to meet the standards of a different social class, typically the upper middle class. Throughout this process the price of renting and owning a home increases while family owned businesses become bankrupt. Low-income families are left homeless and without the support of a
1. What is the nature of community? How do you define neighborhood? What are the differences between community and neighborhood? Sociology has a very real impact on our everyday lives.
But, living in a multicultural city is by itself a very beneficial exercise not only on a personal level but also in terms of cultural exchange, economic exchange and generating new ideas. One experiences what is called cultural variety when living in a diverse area. He is somehow introduced to new kinds of foods, architectures, arts, music, festivals, religions, mythologies, writings and more of general day-to-day life. These new things would easily open one’s heart and mind to new places, new ideas and new people. According to (Wolfstone, 2010) nowadays all people around the world happily go out and eat Chinese food, use Japanese technology, drive German
In The Just City, Susan Fainstein begins to “to develop an urban theory of justice and to use it to evaluate existing and potential institutions and programs” in New York, London, and Amsterdam (p. 5). She wants to make “justice the first evaluative criterion used in policy making” (p. 6). While her book centers on idealism as a way to combat inequity and issues of justice in policy and planning, some may say that this is an unrealistic perspective. Throughout this book she explains the relationship between “democratic processes and just outcomes” (p. 24) which involve equity, diversity and democracy which are the main concepts of this book. Fainstein stresses that these things are important in public policy and urban planning because policy