The primary analysis documents is a letter written by a former slave named Jordan Anderson in 1865. He wrote the letter in response to a letter that his former master Colonel Anderson wrote to him. Colonel Anderson wrote the letter to Jourdan Anderson to request that he come back to work for him (Anderson). In response, Jourdan Anderson wrote his letter to write about his new life as a freed man and how it was better than working for Colonel Anderson and that if he was to come back and work for him, Colonel Anderson would have to comply with certain conditions. In the second document, Speeches by Indian leaders, Nez Perce chief Joseph did speeches about the struggle for freedom of his people. Jourdan Anderson and Chief Joseph struggled for …show more content…
A former slave Jourdan Anderson’s struggle for freedom was he had been a slave for many years and he finally obtained his freedom. In Jourdan Anderson’s letter, he wrote to his former master that he was doing fine as a freed man living in Ohio. One of the things Jourdan Anderson takes into account about being a freed man was his monthly wage. Jourdan Anderson stated that his monthly wage was “twenty-five dollars” (Anderson). During that time period, “twenty-five dollars” was considered at least a decent amount. Jourdan Anderson emphasized on the wage amount because he did not earn any money when he was a slave. Jourdan Anderson stated that there was not pay day for African American during the time when he was living in Tennessee (Anderson). Also, in the letter, Jordan Anderson seemed to stress the importance of education for his children like he mentions they were going to school (Anderson). Jourdan Anderson did write to Colonel Anderson asking him to state if there are schools for African-American …show more content…
In one speech, Chief Joseph mentioned the time when Lewis and Clark came into their territory and chief Joseph and his people treated them kindly like they even gave gifts to each other (Anderson). Chief Joseph was saying that his people were peaceful from the beginning. Then, in another speech, Chief Joseph spoke about how Chief Joseph and his people’s struggle for freedom started when the white people started discovering gold. Chief Joseph stated white people found the gold in the mountains and river and they even stole their stable horses and they never returned because Chief Joseph and the Nez Perce were Indians (Chief Joseph). This is one of the points that started the conflict as they were starting to lose their property as white people kept claiming it and felt
So when the time came for a slave (when allowed) to buy himself or his family out, they were faced with the hard truth, as the prices to their freedom were nearly impossible to obtain. So by this period, slaves were experiencing even further constrains, and their freedom was still very limited; these conditions resembled much of the life that slaves experienced decades ago, and that Berlin had described. In which slaves who had the skills could find ways to make use of, and profit from their talents, and also have the chance to improve even if a little their quality of
So, the white men were fine with letting the Cherokees stay where they were UNTIL they heard there was a whole lot of gold on it, then the white men wanted the land. John Ross was committed to keeping the Cherokee land away from white men because he loved the land and Cherokee Indians a lot. He had even turned down 200,000 dollars that the white men were going to give him for the land. But, eventually, in the year 1830, things got really bad, the US Gov’t passed the Indian Removal Act and in Georgia the white men held a lottery to give away the Indians’ land. John Ross tried to use diplomacy to have the Cherokee’s rights to the land recognized.
In 1742 the chief of Onondaga of the Iroquois Confederacy knew that his land that the people shared would become more valuable than it has ever been. (Doc B)The reason for this was because the “white people” also known as the Americans wanted the land of the chief. The feelings of the Chief result in complaining to the representatives of Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia,
From the time of the American Revolution in 1776, to the year 1852, there has been many causes to the opposition to slavery. Some have shown the support for increased opposition while others have shown to not support this opposition. This has caused many disputes about who is in the right. There is plenty of evidence between the two groups which were either supporting the opposition to slavery or they were not supporting the opposition. Three causes exist in support of and against this opposition: Social Darwinism, increased tolerance, and the need to unite the nation.
During slavery, it was rare to find a black man who succeeded towards learning and being a risk-taker. To begin with, part of the title is a strong word. Ingrate is a person who is not grateful; not appreciative. The story focus on three main people, but only one stood out. Joshua Leckler, a hardworking man, who doesn’t give up on landing his freedom.
The Trail of Tears was a massive transport of thousands of Native Americans across America. After the Indian removal act was issued in 1830 by president Andrew Jackson, the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Muscogee, and Seminole tribes were taken from their homelands and transported through territories in what many have called a death march. The government, on behalf of the new settlers ' cotton picking businesses, forced the travel of one hundred thousand Native Americans across the Mississippi River to a specially designated Indian territory for only the fear and close-mindedness of their people. The Native Americans were discriminated against by not only their new government, but also the people of their country and forced to undertake one of the most difficult journeys of their lives.
Sources Analysis Freedom During the Reconstruction era, the idea of freedom could have many different meanings. Everyday factors that we don't often think about today such as the color of our skin, where we were born, and whether or not we own land determined what limitations were placed on the ability to live our life to the fullest. To dig deeper into what freedom meant for different individuals during this time period, I analyzed three primary sources written by those who experienced this first hand. These included “Excerpts from The Black Codes of Mississippi” (1865), “Jourdan Anderson to his old master” (1865), and “Testimony on the Ku Klux Klan in Congressional Hearing” (1872).
While Reconstruction after the Civil War seemed to have promise for former slaves, there were still many hardships. President Andrew Johnson’s leniency with the south during this decisive period allowed for there to be debate over what the fate of freed slaves should be. Some believed that continuing to work in the fields they were once slaves in was the best option for blacks because of their past as field workers, while others believed that there were more options for blacks than just farm work as seen in the schools built in the south for the black population by the Freedman’s Bureau. However, the question still remained as to what freedom for blacks truly meant. People’s opinions on what freedom for ex-slaves needed to be depended exclusively on their race and their socioeconomic status.
More conflict arose because the government didn’t stop coal miners from entering and mining on the sacred and sustainable lands of the indians, disregarding the treaty. Although the government attempted to buy the lands, the Sioux were reluctant in giving sacred lands to greedy miners moving westward. Rather than keeping peace as the treaties were intended to, they caused more conflict amongst the settlers and
Due to the Northwest Ordinance there wasn’t “slavery nor involuntary servitude in the said territory” (Doc. H) showing how people were starting to realize how slavery was wrong and inhumane. The relationship between the Indians and the Americans had also shifted due to the revolution. The Native Americans were concerned about their relationship with the Americans due to the fighting with the British, but “it [made] [their] hearts rejoice to find out that [their] great father, and his children the Americans have at length made peace”(Doc. C). The Chickasaw Indians were happy to see that their relationship with the Americans was improving due to the American Revolution.
As the song goes, "In 1492,in fourteen ninety two, Columbus sailed the ocean blue." Before Christopher Columbus sailed to the New World, the Native Americans knew it as their home. Soon after Columbus reported back to let all of Europe know that he successfully found land, European settlers quickly followed. Every tribe was one of it 's kind, yet their cultures shared the importance of their religious practices, beliefs, and values . The Native Americans were generally very peaceful people, that is, until the Europeans invaded their land and forced them to fight back.
“Yes, sir, he gives me enough, such as it is.” The colonel, after ascertaining where the slave belonged, rode on; the man also went on about his business, not dreaming that he had been conversing with his master. He thought, said, and heard nothing more of the matter, until two or three weeks afterwards. The poor man was then informed by his overseer that, for having found fault with his master, he was now to be sold to a Georgia trader. He was immediately chained and handcuffed; and thus, without a moment’s warning, he was snatched away, and forever sundered, from his family and friends, by a hand more unrelenting than death.”
Take Back Our land: Tecumseh Speech to the Osages “We must be united” was the plea from Tecumseh to the Osage tribe. In 1811, Tecumseh, known as the “Greatest Indian”, gave a speech pleading with the Osage tribe that they should unite together to fight against the white man (Tecumseh, 231). He goes on to tell how they had given the white man everything they needed to recover health when they entered their land but in return the white man had become the enemy. The speech to the Osages by Tecumseh illustrates the dangers of the white men to the Indian tribes, and why the tribes should unite together against the white man.
He goes on to show how different white men and Native Americans are; by how they collect food by hunting, where they choose to live is not in the same place for long periods, and although white men have everything they did not have the right to take away liberty.
The Native Americans and white people never got along ever since the time the first pilgrims arrived. After losing many wars to the white men Native Americans soon became controlled by these white men to the point where their children were forced into boarding schools. The government stated that the schools would civilize the native children and fix what they called the indian problem. They saw Native Americans as if they weren’t also part of the human race, as if they were less. That wasn’t the worse part either in the boarding schools where the native american children attended they were mistreated and malnourished.