Overview: The group did an excellent job of presenting their research to the class and incorporating all of the canons. Their presentation was very thorough and I greatly enjoyed the “weebly page” that was displayed in the background while they spoke. Every group member had a part to speak and most members were well rehearsed and knew their information. The group spoke on multiple issues that African Americans face while enrolled in school. These topics ranged from: the school to prison pipeline, with a very large amount of young black men being in jail instead of school, and the lack of pre-school educated black children due to the lack of funding. The group made sure to highlight how these issues directly impact the community around us. …show more content…
They presented data that showed the disparity in suspensions throughout the South and how economically disadvantaged students are less likely to perform well on standardized testing compared to their more financially stable counterparts. Although, the group did not give any arguments on why standardized testing is deemed as a good thing, they were able to speak on both sides of the Atlanta testing scandal. I however was able to find some information as to why many believe standardized testing to be a good thing, the most important of these findings seemed to be that standardized testing provide a lot of useful information that costs very little. Of course money is the backing behind why many politicians support the testing. Furthermore many people agree with standardized testing because it is a way to hold schools accountable for their academic performance. It would have been nice to hear why standardized testing was created in the first place and a brief blurb as to why it is still deemed important today. One of the group members said that he would have wished they had more time to go over the affects of education in the black community for all of those that then attend college. I too would have liked to know how those issues that begin in preschool now begin to factor in to some of the things that many black college students deal with today. Not just for …show more content…
I also feel as though the group should have acknowledged the importance of parent’s involvement with their children’s education. Although I do agree with their statement on how many students come from homes where they are the sole provider for both their and their siblings well being which often reduces their ability to give their all when it comes to school work. Furthermore, the group did address most of the canons, but I would suggest that they went more in depth into how they were all
In this chapter, Jo Boaler describes several school systems who do not use “tracking,” filters that separate students into high-level mathematics classes and low-level mathematics classes. She continues with a discussion that reminds us of the harmful effects of “tracking” and the damage it does to students’ mindsets, both those students on the high-level and the low-level track. Ms. Boaler goes on to suggest that heterogeneous groups of students can effectively work together and individual students can develop a growth mindset. The remainder of the chapter focuses on teaching mixed ability groups effectively and includes an in-depth look at how the tasks students complete and the type of instruction they receive can promote growth mindsets.
One of the reasons I chose to the book Other People’s Children by Lisa Delpit was because I want to be aware of the stereotypes and prejudices this books might uncover that I had and didn’t know I has. Teaching in a DLI program there is big diversity in our school and community. I want to be able to be culturally competent and be able to eliminate my cultural assumptions. I want to be able to understand where my students are and families are coming from so I can adjust my teaching methods and strategies. I thought it was very interesting how in her introduction she talks about how the educational system in this country is more focused on the standardized tests, scripted lessons and mandated classroom management strategies that they seem
They argue that the fact that the results of this test can be seen by all parties involved in the education system allows for accountability on the parts of all involved if test results are not where they should be. They argue that this helps educators by ensuring that all, fourth graders for instance, are being taught the same material and are being tested with the same standardized test across the country. This is seen as being extremely beneficial in that it allows for specific districts and school to make the required adjustments in any area that they fall short off versus the national results. It is also seen by these proponents as helping teachers minimize time wasted trying to put together their curriculum by giving them guidance on what to teach allowing them to focus on educating the children under their
: In my opinion, standardized testing is beneficial but also flawed. I agree they’re non-discriminatory because the content is equivalent for all students, but teachers are “teaching to the test,” leaving out additional learning opportunities. From experience, I believe the tests are
1. Standardized tests are a reliable and objective way to measure student achievement. Multiple choice tests like the ACT and SAT are graded by machines and not subject to bias or subjectivity. Having to rely on scores from teachers is not as reliable as the teachers have a vested interest in producing favorable results. 1.
Some groups connect straightforwardly to only a couple key leaders or constituencies, while others act all the more by implication by broadcasting their message to as wide a group of people as could be expected under the circumstances. Gamson and Wolfsfeld (1993) proposed that social movements depend on the media for three fundamental functions, (1) assembly of political bolster, (2) legitimisation (or acceptance) in the mainstream discourse, and (3) to widen the extent of contentions. Consequently, the quality and nature of the media scope that social movements acquire unequivocally impacts how they are seen in public – to the degree that great or terrible coverage can make or break a social movement (p.114). In relation to the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement, it can be argued that mainstream media outlets have had both a positive and negative effect on the national organisations growth and aim to rebuild the Black Liberation Movement.
In America, there is quite a lengthy history of standardized testing. It all began in 1838 when the American education system began to form ideas of having tests that would be transformed into formal measures of student academic achievement. They were originally created to hopefully show student improvement and academic knowledge, which is also their most common use up to today. The commonly dreaded standardized test, the ACT, was created in order to help more colleges improve their enrollment numbers, and colleges needed a new standardized test in order to do so. But lately, these forms of standardized testing seem to be causing damage to students.
Standardized Testing While can be beneficial, standardized testing isn't improving American education. Standardized testing evaluates only the individual performance of a student instead of the overall growth of a student over the course of a year. In my opinion, Standardized testing is not enhancing education in America. Not all students who are smart and take in all the information test well. For instance, there are many people who simply do not perform well on tests.
Standardized testing has become a very controversial topic amongst the nation. There are two sides, one that agrees that these tests are doing well for students and school officials, and another that argues that these tests are hurting the students taking them and should be put to a stop. Norman R. Augustine wrote an article for the need of standardized testing, and Jessie B. Ramey States the ways that the tests are impairing the learning capability of the students. Norman uses three arguments that people opposing the standardized test would most often use.
Standardized tests are very common in today’s modern society. They are used as a tool to measure a person’s performance and indicate how their estimated performance will be in a college class. Every year hundreds of students take the ACT or SAT in order to get accepted into their college of choice and to receive scholarships, but they fail to see the problems with these standardized tests. As more and more people take these tests, the national average score falls causing doubt in the extremely important system. This is leading people to question whether or not the ACT and SATs are accomplishing what they were created to do.
The Benefits of Optional Standardized Testing According to the data of William Hiss, a previous dean of admissions for Bates College, “students with higher grades and modest test scores did better in college than students with lower grades and higher test scores” (Sheffer). This proves that grades are more accurate predictors of a student's academic success. There are many benefits of making standardized tests optional or not requiring them at all. Standardized tests are a biased way of measuring academic talent.
People like former Education Secretary, Arne Duncan are “concerned about testing too, but he has written he "strongly believes" in annual tests as an educational tool” (Kamenetz). Although some people see standards as a positive incentive, students and teachers suffer from the repercussions of standardized testing. Additionally, others also believe that data enforces progression and reform. LaTasha Gandy, supporter of standardized testing, believes that because of standardized testing, data shows who is falling behind and struggling. (Gandy).
Standardized testing has become one of the most popular types of testing in U.S. public schools to date. Students take numerous standardized tests throughout their childhood schooling. (Studies show that a typical student takes an average of 112 mandated standardized tests between Pre-K and 12th grade.) While standardized testing is one of the main procedures that Universities use to judge incoming students, it is not proven to be the most effective way to convey a student’s actual intelligence level. The U.S. should not focus so heavily on standardized testing because it is not a complete accurate measurement of a student’s intelligence.
Introduction Standardized tests may be used for a wide variety of educational purposes. For example, they may be used to determine a young child’s readiness for kindergarten, identify students who need special-education services or specialized academic support, place students in different academic programs or course levels, or award diplomas and other educational certificates. Thesis Statement Standardized tests should not be eliminated completely, but should rather be evaluated in addition to other factors such as grades, extracurricular activities, and volunteer hours. This would take pressure off of students during standardized tests, allow colleges to see how well-rounded the students are, and give students who are better in other areas
What is intelligence? Can true intelligence even be measured? The theory is that certain tests can measure such intelligence and intellectual achievement. Testing in education and physically, is an attempt to measure a person’s knowledge, or other characteristics in a systematic way. Also, teachers give test to find the certain abilities students possess and tell whether they have learned the subject (“Testing”181).