In the essay The Downside of Living Together written by Meg Jay a clinical psychologist. She informs the audience of the effects of cohabitation and what research she has gathered to provide the reader a better understanding about living with a partner before marriage. Jay’s essay begins with a real-life example of a woman who explains how she felt, and gives information about why she and her partner decided to live together before marriage to begin with. Then Jay moves from an example to statistics and definitions that are applied to her example’s story. After, she revisits her example with the new given information, and then ends by introducing other research studies that offer additional information about marriages. She then concludes her …show more content…
The real-life example that Jay begins her essay with appeals the pathos, because the reader can see what negative impact the divorce of the woman had on her. She also uses quotes from the woman to emphasize how she felt, and to show that she also used an exclamation and question mark at the end of her quotes. Jay quotes the woman a few more times saying what the woman was thinking when they started to move in together to show the reader that her emotions were real. Then Jay uses the term “sliding, not deciding” to explain in real terms what exactly was going on when her example began to lose track. This appeals the pathos and logos, because now the reader is acknowledged about why the woman ended up where she did. Jay also uses word choice to portray a curtain opinion about cohabitation. Some examples of her word choices are, “Sliding into cohabitation wouldn’t be a problem if sliding out were as easy. But it isn’t.” Jay uses sliding as a word that means gradual, and ends that comment with a small three-word sentence that has a big impact on the reader. When there is a small sentence at the end of a large one, it puts more emphasis and importance to it. Another example would be, “A life built on top of “maybe you’ll do” simply may not feel as dedicated as a life built on top of the “we do” of the commitment or marriage”. The word choice of maybe you’ll do …show more content…
The whole message that Jay wants to deliver is about the effects of cohabitation, so it makes sense that she uses the word several times throughout her essay to relate all her information back to her topic. She also repeats her example a few different times to relay the information that she is introducing to the reader back to the example. This can show that Jay is guiding the reader through her essay, and gives reason to her example. The last bit of repetition comes from Jay’s use of parentheses. She uses quotation from her examples and parentheses to show importance and emphasize the message she is trying to
Kathryn Stockett successfully uses rhetorical devices to get the reader to feel and understand the perspectives of the protagonists. Stockett uses pathos, ethos, and logos in her book, since the book about social injustice. The topics in the book range from inequality of the sexes to social classes and racism, Stockett is successful in getting the reader to reflect while reading the book and the themes of the book have a clear presence. We see Stockett use ethos and pathos in the very first chapters when we learn that Hilly doesn't like Minny and Minny doesn't want to say why at first, but the incident with Ms. Holbrook was affecting her chances of getting a job because of the influence Hilly has over this suburban society. In some instances where Stockett uses ethos, pathos is also included in her writing.
It is evident that marriage is full of ups and downs, but the way couples manage these fluctuations in their relationship determines the strength of their connection. Both partners in a committed relationship must feel the same way and work equally as hard to push through potential obstacles. Being devoted to the relationship can ensure that the marriage will be able to survive the hardships and maintain a healthy, successful marriage. The emotional hardships and positives that a married couple endures on a daily basis are presented throughout the entirety of the poem, “Marriage”, by Gregory Corso. Corso’s poem explores the pressures and factors that influence marriage and sheds light on Updike’s short story about a couple facing divorce.
In Saeed Fassaie’s opinionated article, “Lessons from my arranged marriage for a happy relationship”, he explores the transformative power of journey that highlights the issues associated with marriage. Fassaie presents his views about the wide scope of marriage by beginning with a recount of his personal journey towards the symbolic bond: “For the first and second year of our life together, marriage was like a cold war until we both gradually adapted to each other.” His deliberate use of simile depicts his insight regarding the challenging and complex nature of marriage. Guided by Fassaie’s words, the reader is drawn into his interior landscape as he unfolds the journey known as marriage. Fassaie broadens the scope of his understanding as he examines the dilemma of the clash between one another: “I witnessed each couple’s vain struggle to preserve their marriage before the final collapse.”
For example, Mr.Gilmer uses Pathos when making Mayella explain what happened on the supposed day Tom abused and took advantage of her, the reasoning is that in the book it says “Mayella stared at him and burst into tears. She cover her mouth with her hands and sobbed. ”lee241 When this scene happened Mr.Gilmer was questioning Mayella. This showed a negative holistically in the argument; Pathos was strengthened because of the reason it appealed the audience emotion making them feel bad for her, this helped the argument because the audience felt emotion when Mayella was crying this might cause an unbiased audience to feel and think that Tom could possibly be guilty. Also, Mr.Gilmer used Ethos appealing to the audiences good morals for this reason
The biggest theme of The Great Divorce is salvation; more specifically, ensuring one’s immortal soul reaches Heaven and not Hell through the exercising correct moral choices in life and the practice of forgiving others and seeking forgiveness for your own sins. For Lewis, Heaven and Hell are not metaphoric or ideas, they are real places. In the book, Lewis develops this by having other related themes that affect salvation like, vanity vs. pride, love, the value of ideologies, faith vs. skepticism, jealousy, anger, and forgiveness.
NAME- AMANDEEP KAUR STUDENT NUMBER- A01060475 DEFINATION ESSAY A) DEFINE MARRIAGE.
Marrying the Right Person is Important to One’s Career and Life In the movie Freedom Writers, Erin Gruwell and Scott has a special relationship compared with those students, they married but have a bad ending. Nowadays, a wife (or a husband) is not only a part of family, but has an important affection on each others work and the rest of life. Many people now surfer from more and more heavy pressure at work but bring it to home , hence, marrying the right person to release one’s heavy pressure can really help to create a harmonious family relation-ship. Besides, no one can avoid making mistakes, so it is important to have a person that can point out your fault as well as help you to work it out. Many people now get marry before they succeed in their own field, so striving with your partner is better than struggle by yourself.
Love can be a beautiful thing. For many couples, their relationship is strictly between the two involved people. However, the construction of a monogamous relationship has proven to have several problems. Bryan R. Weaver and Fiona Woollard discuss the idea of relationships in the article “Marriage and the Norm of Monogamy”. They used secondary research in order to analyze the problems and values of monogamy, and the value of non-monogamy.
The second hypothesis to be analysed is the theory that divorced people tend to commit suicide more often compared to married people, and married people commit suicide less than single people. The suicides of divorcees can be illustrated by this quote from the book “Suicide”: “The state of conjugal anomy, produced by the institution of divorce, thus explains the parallel development of divorces and suicides. Accordingly, the suicides of husbands which increase the number of voluntary deaths in countries where there are many divorces, form a division of anomic suicide.” (273)
1) The major challenges family sociologist face when answering the question, “What is the current divorce rate”? Also the accurate way to answer this question is by simply explaining the fact that there is no actual divorce rate in the United States. Yet ways that they can make it more understandable is to explain why divorces are so high in today’s society. In comparing the numbers of divorces today with historical times, they can present the percentages of past and present divorce couples in percentages.
Cohabitation is not a new phenomenon yet never be old and likely to be more and more popular in modern life. Despite opposing ideas, many people agreed and supposed cohabitation necessary for their lives. When we go to some areas where students rent rooms or houses to live, you can easily see couples live together as young people are now really familiar with cohabitation. Cohabitation is similar to a mathematics operation, it would give out the result but whether it is right or wrong depends on how we process it. According to the recent statistics done by students of National University HCMC in 2013, one third of the total students are cohabiting.
Is there really a need to be married anymore? Does marriage actually benefit your relationship, or is it an outdated institution that we’ll be better off without? In this speech, I’ll convince you that marriage is a thing of the past, and that society’s views on marriage have changed enough in the past decade that marriage really isn’t necessary anymore. One of the main purposes of marriage is to maintain a permanent relationship, but nowadays marriage doesn’t lead to a permanent relationship due to the increase of divorce rates.
This is a quote by former “Psychology Today” intern Jen Kim who also happens to be a woman who lived with her boyfriend hoping that someday they would get married. However, Jen Kim, as many other women with a similar case, never did. Cohabitation is often the reason behind which long relationships end, and it is not an effective step before marriage. (Let’s start first with some statistics regarding
Matrimony is a source of enormous happiness in the world. The priceless experiences, like being pampered by the loved one, having someone to rely on for support, being applauded for anything done, and so many more things like these, simply make life exhilarated. However, as everything has its own ups and downs, even this institution comes with some learning curves in addition to the goodies. And, these cons of marriage are usually spread-open to a woman once the honeymoon period, or shall we say, the ‘happily-ever-after’ phase is over. No matter whether they are big or small, these issues certainly make some negativity sweep inside the relationship.