Plessy v. Ferguson Case The Plessy v. Ferguson case is often looked at as one of the most well-known cases to make it to the U.S. Supreme Court. This case took place in 1896 and received much attention from both the black and white press, and was mainly accountable for the spread of segregation in the United States. In 1890, Louisiana passed a law that required blacks and whites to be separated on railroad cars. If there was only one passenger car in a train, the blacks and whites must be separated by a curtain or some other form of a barrier. This was called the Louisiana Separate Car Act. Not everyone was pleased with this new act. Many unhappy citizens in New Orleans created a group to try to abolish this law. Homer Plessy was a member …show more content…
Although he had one African-American grandparent, he did not consider himself black. Louisiana law defined him as an “octaroon”- one eighth African American. On June 7, 1892, he purchased a ticket on the East Louisiana Railway from New Orleans to Covington, and intentionally broke the law to establish a case. In result of Plessy’s decision to sit in the whites-only railway car, he was asked to move to the black railway car and he refused. Plessy was immediately arrested. He was held for trial and ordered to pay a twenty-five dollar fine. “He petitioned the Louisiana Supreme Court for a writ against Ferguson, the trial court judge, to stop the proceedings against him for criminal violation of the State law. But the Louisiana State Supreme Court refused.” (Pearson Education) Plessy, along with other members of the group, felt that this Louisiana law violated the Constitution of the United States, specifically the thirteenth amendment, prohibiting slavery, and …show more content…
The seven to one decision was in favor of the defendant, John H. Ferguson. The court did not agree with Tourgee’s argument about the thirteenth amendment. Also, the common opinion of the court was that the Louisiana law did not show that African-Americans were inferior. Justice Harlan, a former slave owner, disagreed with the common opinion of the court. He stated that the constitution is “color-blind and should not make such distinctions based on race, and that such distinctions did, indeed, imply the inferiority of one place to another.” (Kids.Net.Au) In January 1895, Homer Plessy pled guilty and paid the twenty-five dollar
The predictions made by Justice Harlan were accurate, as he thoroughly predicted on what the ruling entailed. The ruling allowed for the ignorance of the amendments that protect the rights of colored citizens and allowed them to stay as citizens. In the Plessy v. Ferguson case, the ruling ended up impacting the country in the way he described with aggressions being stimulated. Colored people lost many of their rights that were granted upon the passing of the 14th and 15th amendments, and they were faced with violence and prejudice. A rift between the colored and white was created with colored being labeled as being inferior to whites.
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (U.S. 1896) gave states the legal right to require persons of different races to use separate but equal segregated facilities. But that ruling was struck down in the landmark case of Brown v. Bd. of Educ. , 347 U.S. 483 (U.S. 1954), In that case the court held that separate but equal public schools based on race is a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and is unconstitutional. In upholding that decision, Cooper v. Aaron held that state governments must comply with Supreme Court rulings and court orders based on the its interpretation of the
Ferguson of the criminal District Court of New Orleans who originally approved the Louisiana statute. He confirms that Plessy was a citizen of the United States, and indeed a resident of Louisiana. He also acknowledges that Mr. Plessy is of mixed descent embodying seven - eighths Caucasian and one - eighth of African descent which was invisible to the naked eye. Without admitting his race when asked on the white - passenger train, Plessy would have been seen as an average white male. Ferguson accepted and declared, “he was entitled to every recognition, right, privilege and immunity secured to the citizens of the United States of the white
Some of his and Justice John Harlan's arguments, laid the groundwork for future actions against an oppressive government. Oliver Brown used many of the same arguments as Homer Plessy, such as stating that separate but equal doctrine was unconstitutional because it violated the plaintiffs 13th and 14th amendment rights. While these arguments were before unsuccessful in Plessy v. Ferguson, they were later successfully backed up by the Supreme Court in Brown v. Board of Education, overruling the earlier set precedent. After the separate but equal precedent was over ruled, separate but equal school facilities were forced to be integrated. Long before this groundbreaking ruling, Justice John Harlan thought that the U.S. constitution should be “color-blind”, and his dreams were one step closer, though he was not there to see it.
Ferguson case. Firstly, Ferguson had previously ruled the Louisiana Railway Car Act, this act declared that Louisiana railroad companies had to provide separate but equal train carts for white and black passengers. Also, Ferguson presided over the case of Homer Plessy v. The State of Louisiana. Later, Ferguson then found Plessy guilty of not leaving the white train car and declared that the Separate Car Act was in this case constitutional. Finally, 50 years after everything occurred relatives Plessy and Ferguson united to create a foundation that provides civil rights education, preservation, and
Short Essays Identify and give the significance of Plessy v. Ferguson In 1892, even though slavery has ended but there are still racial discrimination in the society. Homer Plessy sat in the railroad car that for only for “white”. Even though he is not fully black but he has some ancestors from France and Spain, he was consider Creole and has to sit in the area for “colored”. He did not move when he was told too.
Even though the case of Plessy v Ferguson did not reach the Supreme Court until the year 1892, the real issue arose in 1890 when a Louisiana state statute was passed. This statue that was referred to as the Separate Car Act. The statue stated that rail companies carrying passengers in the state of Louisiana must
The Plessy v Ferguson case originated from the arrest of Homer Plessy. He decided to sit in the car that was designated for white people, because
Legal Opinion of Overturning Plessy v Ferguson Sentence By: Estephanos Bekele Homer Plessy was an innocent man living in the state of Louisiana. He was a Creole, meaning that he was 7/8th white and only 1/8th black. Nevertheless, in the eyes of the law, he was considered African American. The SAA was the Separate Accommodations Act, created in 1890, for the state of Louisiana, was meant to force the blacks to sit in the back of trains, while whites were allowed to sit in the front of vehicles (Wikipedia Contributors).
Plessy vs. Ferguson, one of the bigger cases in the turning point for rights, gave the black community a big boost forward. There was a man named Homer Adoph Plessy that had a problem with the way things were going at the time and he wanted equal rights. But there was another man named John Ferguson who thought that everything was just skippy. They went to court to settle their quarrel.
Hence, the refusal of Homer Plessy to sit in a Jim Crow railroad car led to his arrest on on June 7th, 1892. Homer, who was forced to exit the white section of the railroad car was furious and requested a court
For nearly a century, the United States was occupied by the racial segregation of black and white people. The constitutionality of this “separation of humans into racial or other ethnic groups in daily life” had not been decided until a deliberate provocation to the law was made. The goal of this test was to have a mulatto, someone of mixed blood, defy the segregated train car law and raise a dispute on the fairness of being categorized as colored or not. This test went down in history as Plessy v. Ferguson, a planned challenge to the law during a period ruled by Jim Crow laws and the idea of “separate but equal” without equality for African Americans. This challenge forced the Supreme Court to rule on the constitutionality of segregation, and in result of the case, caused the nation to have split opinions of support and
Plessy v. Ferguson, argued in 1896, stated that Homer Plessy violated the “Separate Car Act” when he sat in a “white” railway car. According to the government, this law still satisfied the pre-existing doctrine, “Separate But Equal” (Jim Crow Stories). The term “Separate but Equal” justified having separate facilities for different races, as long as both races had the same amount of amenities. According to the government, this did not contradict the 14th Amendment as both races were receiving “equal” access to what claimed to be “equal” services, though white facilities were often better kept than black ones. Plessy was arrested for refusing to get up from a seat reserved for white people, and over time, the controversial case made it to the Supreme Court (American History).
In 1890, the state of Louisiana created an ordinance that required that railroads “provide equal but separate accommodations for the white and colored races” (Course Reader 17). One African American, Homer Plessy, tested out the new law by sitting in a “whites only” portion of a train, and was promptly arrested. This spawned the now infamous Plessy v. Ferguson case. The decision that the Supreme Court held was that the state of Louisiana did not violate the 14th Amendment by establishing and enforcing a policy of racial segregation in its railway. The rationale behind this decision was that this separation will help the two races to come together on their own terms to reach social quality, rather than relying on legislation and the government.
Plessy v. Ferguson and The Separate but Equal Laws A pivotal moment of the history of the United States is the segregation of blacks. Although they were both provided with race-containing facilities, blacks were still not equal to whites. This is because of the Plessy v. Ferguson case and separate but equal laws. It came to the Supreme Court when it was said that the 13th and 14th Amendments were violated; the court enacted upon the separate but equal laws after the trial to isolate blacks from whites.