Do genetics really matter when discussing a person’s ability to perform in their respective sport? Or is it the amount of hours that a person has put into the craft? In “The Sports Gene” by David Epstein, the author attempts to answer this gene vs. practice question. Epstein does this by including examples of high jumpers, differences between average and world champion chess players, as well as what scientists call the ‘big bang’ of body types, to name a few. The author brings up many science topics, such as vision of moving objects, athletic differences between genders, responsiveness to training, specializations in certain sports at young ages, and mutations in DNA and how they affect some very rare athletes. The topics that most intrigued me were responsiveness in training because I love to practice different sports, and DNA mutations, as we are currently studying DNA in our own Biology class. Epstein states that there can be high and low responders to …show more content…
Epstein brings this point up late in the book with the example of Eero Mantyranta, a three time gold medalist skier. The author explains that a scientist studied Mantyranta and realized that Eero had a very high amount of hemoglobin. This is due to the fact that in one of the pairs of bases in the EPO receptor gene, there was an adenine where a guanine should have been. This created a stop codon, leaving the EPOR without ‘brake’ to stop hemoglobin production and Mantyranta’s production of red blood cells increased dramatically. Epstein also brings up the point that Eero had practiced skiing for tens of thousands of hours, and argues that this is the reason, along with the mutation in his DNA, that Mantyranta was a gold medalist. The author interviews Mantyranta himself, and also uses information from a study done on Mantyranta and his family’s DNA to justify
This agreement helps force readers to consider the benefits of science in sports. Without being aware, people may choose the science factor over
People may conclude that we control our destiny, while other think that our success is foredestined by our natural talents. Which is more reasonable? David Epstein and Malcolm Gladwell take two different approaches on this subject. David Epstein, the author of The Sports Gene, a non-fiction article, believes that innate talent has more effect than athletic practice. On the other hand, Malcolm Gladwell, the writer of the Outliers: The Story of Success, also a non-fiction article, disagrees and concluded that practice is more important than innate talent.
Arthur Epstein is the girls’ basketball coach. He has repeatedly exhibited problematic behavior. For example, Epstein will touch all of us during practices. Instead of telling us where to go during drills, he will grab us roughly by our arms and move us around, never asking if we are comfortable with this acute form of contact manipulation. To be fair, he does the same thing to the boys’ team; however, that does not make it any more appropriate.
In “Children Need to Play, Not Compete”, Jessica Statsky tries to highlight the growing issue and destructive effects of the competitive sports. These sports are fabricated keeping the age and standards of an adult which make them unsuitable for children. These sports have a negative impact on a child’s health as a whole. The body and the mind are both equally. Developing bodies of the children suffer a great deal because of the extreme physical activity demanded by the competitive sports.
Many people believe that fate is determined by natural ability, while others believe that one's destiny is determined by themselves. So, innate talent or preparation? Authors David Epstein and Malcolm Gladwell have opposing views on this topic. David Epstein, the author of The Sports Gene, says that natural ability is linked to success, rather than preparation and training. However, Malcolm Gladwell, author of Outliers: The Story of Success, concludes that achievement is the result of preparation and not just innate talent.
In “Do Sports Build Character or Damage it?” Mark Edmundson explains the pros and cons of children who grow up playing football. Firstly, he believes the perseverance it takes to show up for hard practices is useful later in life. Especially when they get frustrated with something and don’t notice the little bits of progress they are making.
American Sociologist, Jonathan R. Cole, in his article, “Why Sports and Elite Academics Do Not Mix,” (2017), argues that highly selective colleges should withdraw from the NCAA to form their own league because these universities are not attempting to create national championship programs. He supports his claim by first describing the revenue that the NCAA receives from monopolizing college sports teams, then explains that these NCAA athletes are involved in scandalous interests due to their lack of quality education and leadership, then reveals the extent a college will go to ensure their athletes can participate in the NCAA, and finally imparts the deprivation that these universities have with diversity of their student’s talents. Cole’s purpose
Innate Talent or Time and Commitment? Some believe that we are born with the skills to become successful whereas others say that we have to train our bodies and minds to become elite. Authors, David Epstein, writer of The Sports Gene and Malcolm Gladwell, of Outliers: The Story of Success squabble between natural born talent versus continuous training. But what some journalist forget, is that not everyone is born with a gift to be prosperous in a skill. Moreover, some are able to train their mind and body into becoming well rounded in a field of choice.
It seems that everything that is physical is easy for Finny to do. But for Gene sports don’t come that easily to
Many people have strong beliefs as to what holds the power of our outcomes, but no one explains it better than Epstein and Gladwell. Both of these authors had very compelling stories about their stories and research about what they believe to control our outcomes. David Epstein 's story, "The Sports Gene," he talks about two very different high jump athletes that eventually meet up to have very similar outcomes. These athletes got to their destiny through very different processes and especially due to physical circumstances, and this is his point. Then, Malcom Gladwell has the story of "Outliers," and with his story, he talks about how people gain success and their outcomes through hard work and practice only.
The author of "The Sports Gene", David Epstein, takes the subject at the opposite view stating people are given innate talent that is out of our control. Epstein supports his argument that people have no control over their destiny by using specific examples. However, with strong evidence
Dr. Frank L. Smoll states, “All children and youth need vigorous physical activity as part of their daily lives, and sports provide the benefits of exercise and the potential for acquiring a sense of accomplishment.” (Smoll 1/2).
In life, people will experience different things that will have an influence on who they are as well as who they will become. These experiences are in direct correlation to future success. Some believe that most of these experiences are outside of one 's own control, such as where he was born, where he goes to school or even a financial situation. While this makes sense, there is one thing that is within one 's control that will greatly increase the likelihood of one 's achievements. Playing sports in high school has a positive impact on future success.
A study shows that “The exercise programs may actually enhance the development of specific types of mental processing known to be important, for meeting challenges encountered both in academics and later in life.” Also, the athletes are improved since high school. The kids that play sports have a higher chance to be smarter, and be physically well. The best part of sports is that you can improve major parts of your life, which is physical health, psychological health, social skills, and academic
The Evolution of Science and Sports- Unit 9 1. Share some information about the science behind your sport or recreation of choice. My recreation of choice is camping. I have been camping my whole life.