Summary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Brady V. Bobti
Introduction:
The United States Supreme Court cases of Brady v. Maryland, Giglio v. United States, and United States v. Agurs all deal with the prosecution's obligation to disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense. These cases establish that prosecutors have a constitutional duty to disclose all evidence favorable to the accused. Failure to disclose this information violates due process and can result in a new trial or acquittal.
Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963):
Brady v. Maryland is a landmark case establishing that prosecutors must disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense. In this case, John Brady and Charles Boblit were convicted of murder and sentenced to death. At trial, the prosecution presented evidence that Brady and Boblit
…show more content…
The Court held that prosecutors must disclose any evidence favorable to the accused and material to guilt or punishment. If the evidence can establish the defendant's innocence or mitigate the sentence's severity, the prosecution must disclose it to the defense.
Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972):
Giglio v. United States is another landmark case that deals with the prosecution's obligation to disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense. Giglio was convicted of conspiracy to defraud the United States in this case. At trial, a key witness for the prosecution was a co-conspirator who had been promised immunity from prosecution in exchange for his testimony. The prosecution failed to disclose to the defense that the witness had been promised immunity.
The Supreme Court held that the prosecution's failure to disclose the promise of immunity violated Giglio's right to due process. The Court held that prosecutors are obligated to disclose any evidence favorable to the accused and are material to guilt or punishment, including evidence that could be used to impeach the credibility of a government witness. In this case, the promise of immunity was material because it could have been used to impeach the credibility of the government
Case Summary: Brady Vs. Maryland, 373 US
993 Words | 4 PagesCase Summary Part 1 The prosecution is legally bound to disclose to the defense evidence that is favorable to the defendant. Three examples of the prosecutor’s obligations to disclose evidence are Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), and United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). According to Rule 3.8, “the prosecutor must make timely disclosure to the defense of all evidence or information known to the prosecutor that tends to negate the guilt of the accused or mitigates the offense, and, in connection with sentencing, disclose to the defense and to the tribunal all unprivileged mitigating information known to the prosecutor, except when the prosecutor is relieved of this responsibility by
Summary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Connick V. Thompson
1331 Words | 6 PagesThompson committed many Brady violations. Brady violations are based on Brady v. Maryland, in which the court required prosecutors to turn over exculpatory evidence. There was a large lack of stability regarding the main evidence of the case. The victim’s family gave a reward to the person who provided the main evidence of the case in which Thompson was sentenced to the death penalty (Equal Justice Initiative). The prosecutors failed to disclose this information with the defense, and therefore hid a crucial factor of the case.
Gerald Gault Court Case Summary
891 Words | 4 PagesSupreme Court reviewed previous case law, Betts v. Brady, which questioned the rights of due process for an indigent defendant under the Fourteenth Amendment which could not afford to retain an attorney for his court proceedings and the state denied his request for appointed counsel. In 1942 when this case was originally heard, the Court ruled that the lower courts did not violate the petitioner Fourteenth Amendment rights. However, this Court overruled the previous ruling with a unanimous vote. The Court viewed the importance of due process stating, “the procedural rules which have been fashioned from the generality of due process are our best instruments for the distillation and evaluation of essential facts from the conflicting… data that life and our adversary methods present (In re Gault, 2017).”
Compare And Contrast Boblit And Brady
1244 Words | 5 PagesSo therefore, not having that key piece of evidence tainted Brady’s case which resulted
What Is Officer Noname Violation Of The Spring Falls Police Department
829 Words | 4 PagesI have given this investigation careful consideration due to Officer Noname’s length of service within the Spring Falls Police Department. Through the facts given and statements made by Officer Noname, I am requesting immediate termination of employment. By lying to investigating officials in his involvement with the misuse of department resources, Officer Noname has become untrustworthy and his credibility as an officer of the law has been brought into question. It is from this incident that if Officer Noname were to give testimony in a hearing, his credibility would be called upon due to his dishonesty during this investigation. In Brady v. Marland (1963) and Giglio v. United States (1972), the Supreme Court has imposed rulings that all exculpatory evidence must be disclosed and that the defendant has a right to learn of any incriminating and/or discrediting information pertaining to the witnesses against them and may result in impeachment of witness testimony.
The Pros And Cons Of The Brady Rule
910 Words | 4 PagesIn United States v. Agurs, the Court set out three situations in which the Brady Rule applies: 1) the government must disclose material evidence that it is aware of or should be aware of that indicates a witness perjured his/her testimony, 2) the government must disclose material evidence specifically requested by the defendant before trial, and 3) the government must disclose exculpatory evidence even if the defendant does not make a request or only makes a general request for such evidence. The Court’s decision in Agurs also provided that the definition of “material evidence” for purposes of the Brady Rule is information that creates a reasonable doubt of the defendants’
The Outcome Of Eroy Brown's Trial
1493 Words | 6 PagesEroy Brown was a convicted murderer who faced several trials throughout his life. The outcome of his trials was influenced by several factors, including the evidence presented in court, the jurors’ biases, and the actions of the prosecution and defense. One of the most significant factors that influenced the outcome of Eroy Brown’s trials was the evidence presented in court. In some cases, the evidence was conclusive and left no doubt as to Brown’s guilt or innocence. For example, in one of his trials, Brown was convicted of murdering a fellow inmate based on eyewitness testimony and physical evidence found at the scene of the crime.
Brady V. Maryland Argumentative Essay
390 Words | 2 PagesIn the 1963 ruling in Brady v. Maryland, the United States Supreme Court ruled that any government state or federal has the duty to disclose to a defendant and his counsel any exculpatory information or evidence in its possession. If the
John Wayne Gacy's Contributions To The Justice System
1030 Words | 5 PagesThe Constitution states “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.” ( US Constitution) As you can see, the Bill of Rights 6th Amendment allows the accused to understand the charges against them: the accused is told what he/ she is being accused of, who is accusing them, and is allowed to enter a plea of guilty or not guilty. Moreover, it allows for the movement of rightful convictions.
Defense Attorney Discussion Paper
362 Words | 2 PagesIn 1963, Brady v. Maryland was established by the Supreme Court, which required the prosecutor to hand over to the defense exculpatory evidence. This allowed for the defense to gain evidence which pointed towards the innocence of the defendant. According to Brady v. Maryland 373 U.S. 83 the primary holding stated that, “withholding of evidence that is
Argumentative Essay On The Fourth Amendment
427 Words | 2 PagesBack in 1975, there was a major case called, Payton V. New York. Theodore Payton was suspected of murdering a gas station manager, they found evidence within his home that connected him with the crime. What caused the problem was the fact New York had a law that allowed unwarranted searches if the person was a suspect. Based off the oral argument presented by Oyez, the police said it didn't count as the evidence because it was in public view when entering the home. It had to be appealed before it was determined as unconstitutional.
Conviction In Supreme Court Cases
230 Words | 1 PagesThe Supreme Court recently began hearing oral arguments in a case, where two men were convicted of bribery by a jury. However, that conviction was overturned by an appeal because the jury had been improperly instructed as to what constitutes a guilty verdict. The attorney for the defense, Lisa Blatt said, “The government should bear the consequences when overlapping charges produce split verdicts of acquittals and invalid convictions.” This quote identifies with one of the fundamental principles of the American legal system, the presumption of innocence until proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt. While Blatt continues to argue that the vacated conviction is worthless.
Prosecutorial Injustices
1623 Words | 7 PagesAfter careful review of the assigned material The Untouchables: America’s Misbehaving Prosecutors, And The System That Protects Them, an article by Radley Balko published in the Huffington Post August 2013 argues Brady violations which are the failure to disclose, as a matter of law, exculpatory evidence, as required under Federal case law. Balko addresses prosecutor misconduct and lists the tens of thousands of prosecutorial misconduct cases that have been studied by ProPublica, the Center for Public Integrity, USA Today, the Innocence Project , and Yale Law. Senate Bill s. 353 was introduced in Senate on 3 February 2015 titled Justice Safety Valve Act of 2015. This bill authorizes a federal court to impose a sentence in a criminal proceeding
774 S. E. 2d 546
537 Words | 3 PagesState, 332 Ga. App. 546, 774 S.E.2d 126 (2015) • Generally, if the indictment sets out the offense as done in a particular way, the proof must show it so, or there will be a variance. Martinez v. State, 750 S.E.2d 504 (Ga. Ct. App. 2013). • There is no requirement that the State present testimony that precisely follows the language found in the indictment.
Reasonable Doubt In Twelve Angry Men
1011 Words | 5 PagesThis is an important element when deciding who the best and worst jurors were. There were no facts as to who was right or wrong because we didn’t see the crime in question. All
More about Summary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Brady V. Bobti
Case Summary: Brady Vs. Maryland, 373 US
993 Words | 4 PagesSummary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Connick V. Thompson
1331 Words | 6 PagesGerald Gault Court Case Summary
891 Words | 4 PagesCompare And Contrast Boblit And Brady
1244 Words | 5 PagesWhat Is Officer Noname Violation Of The Spring Falls Police Department
829 Words | 4 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of The Brady Rule
910 Words | 4 PagesThe Outcome Of Eroy Brown's Trial
1493 Words | 6 PagesBrady V. Maryland Argumentative Essay
390 Words | 2 PagesJohn Wayne Gacy's Contributions To The Justice System
1030 Words | 5 PagesDefense Attorney Discussion Paper
362 Words | 2 PagesArgumentative Essay On The Fourth Amendment
427 Words | 2 PagesConviction In Supreme Court Cases
230 Words | 1 PagesProsecutorial Injustices
1623 Words | 7 Pages774 S. E. 2d 546
537 Words | 3 PagesReasonable Doubt In Twelve Angry Men
1011 Words | 5 Pages