The Unlikely Disciple: A Sinner’s Semester At America’s Holiest University by Kevin Roose gives a unique perspective on the different cultures in America and how diverse each one can be. Kevin Roose, an undergraduate at Brown University, decides to “study abroad” at the conservative evangelical Liberty University to see what it was like in stark contrast to his liberal Ivy League. Upon arriving there, he was an outsider who was used to seeing those types of people (evangelicals/born-again Christians) as kooks and weirdos, however, as he really dives into Liberty’s culture, he realizes that the students there really don’t hold secret meetings to create anti-abortion rallies or beat up gay kids in their spare time. There was a surprising amount …show more content…
Roose’s approach was immersion, which could also be associated with ethnocentrism, because he bases his analysis of Liberty off of his native culture. Even analyzing off of these standards, he is still able to assimilate and find his place in Liberty. This gives a more “human” perspective on a culture than just averages and numbers. Roose’s approach is not “scientifically rigorous”, as in he doesn’t use statistics or tests or much less the standard scientific method, but that’s what makes his account all the more relatable. It was important for him to study this subculture through immersion rather than statistics because it’s people like him who this perspective is useful to, which is the more common majority in America than the ever-shrinking fundamentalist Christians. For example, if one just asked students how they felt at Liberty, of course they would say, “I love Liberty! I love the rigidity and discipline to help me steer a straight path towards God!”, and people would most likely discredit it as bias towards Christianity or that the student has been “culturally brainwashed”. In Roose’s case, however, he’s on the opposite side of the spectrum, from a liberal family who are “Quakers”, but which seems to just mean “Agnostic” these days. Roose is an outsider, which is appealing to most of America, because they too are outsiders to Liberty’s counterculture. What makes his story credible and useful
In the novel Fallen Angels by Walter Dean Myers, the main character is Richie Perry. At seventeen he graduated high school in Harlem, and he wanted to go to college, but his mother couldn’t afford to send him to college since she was an alcoholic. So he joined the army to escape his unfortunate future, but joining the army meant he had to leave his little brother Kenny, who saw him as a father figure since their father left when they were younger. Perry was sent to Vietnam and through his journey, he made lifelong bonds with many different people such as PeeWee, Monaco, and etc. Also in his journey, he suffers from mental and physical wounds.
Nicholas Lemann begins his book “Redemption: The Last Battle of the Civil War” with the 1873 Colfax, Louisiana massacre where a White League militia comprised of former Confederate soldiers killed black Republican voters. The Colfax massacre was perhaps the bloodiest event of Reconstruction. Lemann views this event as a startup of what would happen later in Mississippi if Federal troops did not defend black voters. Lemann blames Ulysses S. Grant’s Secretary of War, William W. Belknap, for not stopping the White Line activity in Louisiana and Mississippi. Grant had worked hard to stop the Ku Klux Klan in the early 1870s with Congress passing legislation and Federal troops putting down Klan activity.
A great deal of contradicting information has been layered over the nature of the Civil War. Those would remember it today as a “just cause,” maintain that the issue of succession was solely about states’ rights against what the Southern States saw as an aggressive Republican government under, newly elected, President Abraham Lincoln. There are many surviving documents from the pre-war era supporting the argument as States Rights only and many supporting documents that support the institution of Slavery as a central issue. According to Dew’s, historians are also often split on what was the true nature of the act of succession by the Southern States of the US. It is hard to remove slavery from the many arguments altogether, and perhaps, including
David Brooks utilizes the rhetorical devices of Logos, Ethos, and Pathos to build his argument that disrespecting American values is counterproductive. First, Brooks uses the Rhetorical device of Pathos to appeal to the emotions of the reader. He says that “Over the centuries, this civic religion fired a fervent desire for change”(Par. 6). Brooks uses the word “fervent” in his writing, because it appeals to the emotions of the reader, It expresses the extent of the desire for change. This is known as pathos.
Significant Teachings from Your Name is Renée Frozen with terror at the sound of voices. Rumbling stomachs begging for unreachable food. Never seeing the sunlight unless fortunate enough to have a window. Lying still for hours with horrifying thoughts of being found.
Alfred Green uses ethos to build his credibility and pathos to use people emotions in an attempt to gain support. He builds credibility by alluding to a speech given by Thomas Paine in lines 21-22, which shows that he is educated. He also shows his education when talking about famous and successful leaders. He also builds credibility with African Americans because he, too, is African American. By appearing to be well educated, it convinces African Americans to accept Green’s argument as he seems credible and intelligent.
In chapter 3 of Speaking of Jesus, Carl Medearis talks about what it means to own Christianity. He says "If we don't truly know what the gospel is, we have to find an explanation for Christianity." Meaning that if we do not know what the gospel is or what it is teaching us, then we try to define it by our own standards, and that is where it gets messy. Medearis talks about how Christianity is more than a religion, but it is a relationship and people tend to not understand that. He explains why people are so defensive and put up their guards towards Christians, because Christians can be so judgemental.
In the story of Robin Hood, Robin stole, but only from the rich so that he could give to the poor. He justified the sin of theft by claiming he had the good intentions of helping the poor. A similar circumstance to this occurs in Born Again by Charles Colson. The author is sent to jail for taking part in Watergate. Colson is in an Alabama jail where the prisoners are only allowed to wear dark brown clothing.
The Theme of Limiting Expectations The quote, “Expectation is the root of all heartache” written by Shakespeare epitomize the stories of “Brother Dear” and “Boys and Girls”. The expectations set by others transform the characters views on their daily lives and future choices; however, they develop through their given limitations by maturing, and making realizations on their own. Yet, the new found freedom of choice creates conflict within families and society.
Growing up Christianity had always been part of my life and there was no question about it. My family was christian and the culture that my parents grew up in was heavily religious. However, I personally never had a true connection to Christ at a young age. To me church was the place I went to answer questions in Sunday School and win prizes for it, and that was how I saw it for a long time. It was hard for me to see it has more than that and from the outside I may have looked like the kid had a true connection with Christ by the way I talked in front of the church when my class presented, or the fact that I was able to answer most if not all the questions correctly.
In his book The Promise Chaim Potok leads the reader on a heartbreaking journey full of spiritual conflict and decision. As a sequel to The Chosen, The Promise picks up with Reuven Malter, the main character and a Jewish man now in his mid-twenties, attending Hirsch University, a Jewish seminary in Brooklyn, New York. Reuven keeps his friendship with Danny Saunders, whom he met on a baseball field during his teenage years and later went to college with, even though they now go their separate ways as Reuven becomes a rabbi, and Danny practices psychology. During the summer Reuven dates Rachel Gordon, the niece of Abraham Gordon, a man excommunicated from the Jewish society, and meets Abraham’s son, Michael, a stubborn teen with a mental issue. Also, over the same summer Reuven’s father, David Malter, wrote a controversial book about the Talmud.
Rotting in a cell. Counting down the days. Trying to learn how to be a man before the big day. In the book “A Lesson Before Dying” by Ernest J. Gaines: Grant Wiggins a school teacher tries to help a falsely convicted black man named Jefferson. During this time Grant release what can do to not only change Jefferson but change himself as well and he achieves redemption.
In the poem, “Becoming and Going: An Oldsmobile Story” by Gerald Hill the speaker is traveling down a road in the Fort Qu’appelle Valley. He notices his father and his son are also driving down this road. The speaker then begins to list the two men’s characteristics. As he lists them we see that the father and the son have both similarities and differences in their personalities.
A Visual Analysis of The Burning Monk In Malcome Browne’s photo, The Burning Monk, the ethical issue raised is the means and extent of protest that is acceptable. The monk, Thích Quảng Đức, wholehearted believed in the freedom to practice Buddhism and was willing to sacrifice himself to garner attention. However, many people would argue that his form of protest was too radical and not ethical due to the self-immolation. Regardless of how radical and shocking a protest may be, or how uncomfortable it makes people feel, it is still just if it is in service of a good cause. After all, the more radical your protest, the more radical the response; Thích Quảng Đức hoped for there to be a massive and radical response to his protest so he acted accordingly.
However, they expose him to religion in violent and mentally abusive ways that make their purpose larger than religion itself while completely ignoring Richard’s attempts to make his own choices with religion. Even as Richard becomes older and more able to think for himself, his family’s actions only intensify and they forever change his opinion on religion. However, while Richard’s family was unethical in the way they exposed him to religion, their actions truly reflect the hardships that are associated with a poor African American family during their time. Throughout his childhood, Richard is constantly exposed to religion in unethical ways by his family.