In this chapter, the author claims that everyone should discover what weaknesses they possess as well as strengths. The author Gladwell first uses Vivek Randivé and his daughter’s middle school basketball team to exemplify his claim. Randivé realizes that the teams’ greatest weakness was that they had no experience. When this was realized, Randivé decided to introduce a full court press during all their games because they do not need to be as good as all the other teams in order to play hard defense during a full court press. Usually teams only full court press if they are down in the last couple minutes in the last quarter of a game. Randivé’s team would press every game in order to have a chance of winning especially against good teams. It is not too …show more content…
Hundreds of years ago artists main goal was to get into the Salon, which was where the greatest paintings of all of France went. The artists become little fish in the big pond because so many people are trying to get in to the salon while only a select few get in. It got so bad that artists tried making their own salons to try and get in to the real salon even though it was nearly impossible. The next example the Author uses is how Caroline Sachs was trying to decide whether she wanted to go to The University of Maryland or Brown University. Students think that if they go to a college with a better reputation they will be more successful in life, which in reality isn’t the case. Very intelligent people go to the colleges that have a better reputations so Caroline would be a small fish in a big pond because she is also a 4.0 student. She ended up not following through with the major she wanted because it was too hard for her so she picked a new, not as appealing major. She could’ve chose to be a big fish in a little pond but instead was a little fish in a big pond regretting
In “How Duke Transformed its Defense from a Susceptible Shortcoming to a Special, Stifling Zone” by Dan Greene, the author outlines the sudden transformation of Duke University’s Men Basketball team from a horrible defensive squad into one that is hard to score on. Offensively, Duke is loaded with talent and has many players who are capable of scoring the basketball. However, Defense has been a struggle for Duke this season, causing them to lose crucial games. The author summarizes Duke’s transformation by explaining the influences, advantages, and statistics of the zone defense. Duke has not always run zone defense.
Although it seems unusual, it’s quite common in the sports industries today. Sports like soccer, the Olympics, even the world of classical music, picks their future stars from a young age and seek out those “special” ones. This short description of a successful type of athlete leads to Gladwell’s talk about the outlier of being successful and success is looked upon.
In Outliers, Gladwell endeavors to reply, "What makes a few individuals fruitful while others can't appear to understand their maximum capacity?" In contemporary U.S. society, individuals are viewed as fruitful when they exemplify specific qualities and attributes: industriousness, benevolence, knowledge, ability. In any case, Gladwell says that the conditions and circumstances encompassing our lives are the huge powerful elements that focus our prosperity, not our inward capacity or ability. Give us a chance to take ice hockey as a case. The best ice hockey stars have been solid, driven, and as indicated by Gladwell conceived in the initial three months of the logbook year, making them physically bigger and more able contrasted with their less develop peers.
Brent was now 16 years old, and was on the New Haven high school basketball team. In his Sophomore year, he had won the MVP (Most Valuable Player) award. He had faced his challenge of becoming a one armed basketball player, when he was 7 years old. Nastier remarks then can be thought about in the human language were spoken. Brent did not let this get to his head, with the undenying thought of going all-pro in the sport he loved.
Diehm builds this credibility by not only giving out facts, but also by explaining the significance of these facts. These facts show that Diehm knows what she is talking about, this because Diehm uses quotes from the coach and other coaches in the team’s division to explain the team’s issues and successes from a non-views side. Using quotes from the coach shows the audience that Diehm is not just an avid viewer, but active in all that this basketball team does. Diehm also shows her expertise by describing facts rather than just stating them. When describing the point distribution across the 111-game streak, Diehm explains the significance of the “core four” players and what it means that they each have scored over a thousand points in the past 111 games.
In Andrew Braaksma’s essay “Lessons from the Assembly Line” (Braaksma, 2005), he recalls his time as a free-spirited college student that moonlights as an automotive assembly plant worker during summer vacation. The essay shifts from his grueling experiences on the line to his easygoing life as a student, highlighting the disparity between the two worlds. Ultimately, he comes to a better understanding of the advantages he has in life while simultaneously recognizing that real-world experience is another useful form of education. The main points of Braaksma’s article are showcasing the life struggles of the average blue-collar worker and underscoring the importance of a formal education.
Also, it’s been clear that the boys experience this abuse on a lesser extent, only their arms being grabbed, less frequently at that, and that being the farthest he will go with such conduct. The girls team, on the contrary, have to deal with much worse treatment. Additionally, the boys’ basketball instruction is more informative. It is evident that Epstein does not expect the girls team to do well, because he thinks that we, as girls, cannot do well. Contrastingly, with the boys, their practices are
Employing the research method from the very beginning, Gladwell asserts that “those born in the last quarter of the year might as well give up” on athletics, based on a pattern he observed in certain Canadian hockey teams, most players being born in the beginning of the year (Gladwell 32). Though seemingly sound, his argument needs to be supported by more data, including figures from other sports, such as baseball, football, etc., as the data he puts forth, is only applicable to hockey. As it is not wholly representative of all athletes, this means his conclusion that athletes born in the beginning of the year are inherently better than their younger counterparts, is not necessarily
Gladwell suggests that grouping the better kids together and pushing the less talented to the side will eventually lead to the “better” kids continuing to advance to higher levels while the “less talented” will not get any better. Ending the favoritism towards choosing older children in sports because they are more mature is important, because it bases the selection of players on age rather than skill
For many years, people have been debating about whether sports teams for kids should have selective tryouts. Although some parents claim that their child has felt so defeated by an unsuccessful tryout that they don’t want to continue with the sport, this is not always what happens. I believe that exclusive tryouts should be held for children because they are extremely good for their mental health in three ways: tryouts teach kids humility, in that they aren’t always going to be selected, they help kids learn to work harder, and they boost kids’ confidence. The first reason why tryouts should be held is because they teach kids how to be humble, and that they are not always going to do everything as well as they want.
Because I’m the only one.” (p. 257). When the prejudice first started, Jeevin was understandably upset. However, he often talks to his mother “about everything” and his mother tells him that “that’s the only way [the other kids have got] to take [Jeevin] out of [his] game” (p. 258). He realizes during these conversations that the discrimination is being used to distract him from his skill, and uses his courage and love of basketball to continue persevering through these obstacles to improve his skills every day.
In the article titled "Offensive Play" published in 2009 by the New Yorker, Malcolm Gladwell argues that NFL players, in particular linemen, and dogfighting resemble due to the amount of violence that has been done to their bodies and the long-term effects they acquired from the amount of violence. However, this analogy that Gladwell presents throughout the article that can be viewed as a false dichotomy. Gladwell deftly manipulates his audience into believing in the analogy by the end of the article, but the truth is that the analogy is far off because of player have an option of choice. Gladwell makes this analogy hard to follow throughout the article because of spiraling transitions between subject focus.
In Russel Baker's essay, "The Art of Eating Spaghetti", he was trying to express that what you end up doing shouldn't be determined by how hard it will be, but instead by if you want to do it or not. He says that he felt that he wanted to be writer, but knew that it kids didn't just graduate and be a writer. At the end, he says, "Writing couldn't lead to a job after high school, and it was hardly honest work, but Mr. Fleagle had opened a door for me." The most effect part of his essay was when he wrote about how proud he felt when Mr. Fleagle was reading his essay out loud and everyone was listening and laughing, because it's what he would feel when people read his future stories as a writer.
He is a prime example of that. In chapter one Gladwell talks of hockey, soccer, and basketball players. These sports all have secret advantage. In hokey and soccer the advantage is their birthdays, if someone was born on the first half year they would have months of practice compared to someone born on the last month of the year.
It shows that in order for one to live happily and carefree, one has to be a part of the upper class