Summary: This article tackles the question of whether or not college athletes are being unfairly exploited due to not being paid. By specifically looking at a court case that aimed to settle this dispute, the author suggests that the court decided that salaries for players were banned because in doing so, the “product” of college sports was being preserved. Abbott explains that college sports will lose their authenticity because of the fact that providing salaries for these athletes will greatly favor large and well funded athletic programs. The compensation will greatly lessen the chance for any type of “upset” or “Cinderella story” and therefore make college sports boring. Analysis: This article will be helpful in supporting the synthesis …show more content…
The author suggests that because not all college athletes are on scholarship, many of them still have to be employed to be able to pay for their college. Therefore, the author argues that while playing a collegiate sport, a full time job in itself, many athletes have to work another job on top of it. The article suggests that with compensation, this problem, along with many other problems including ending corruption and increasing motivation to play, can be …show more content…
2019, www.theperspective.com/debates/sports/college-athletes-get-paid/. Summary: In the bottom section of this article, the author delves into a couple specific reasons why college athletes do not need or deserve compensation. Piccioto talks more about the harm that compensation for college athletes does to them, rather than the harm done to the universities. Piccioto suggests that paying college athletes takes away from what college actually is and he argues that the athletes should be treated as normal students, since they really are. Compensation, he feels, would totally take away from the college experience, like having internships, and would lead these athletes down the wrong path. Analysis: This article could be used to aid in supporting the synthesis question because of the fact that it is unique from all the other sources, since it takes a stand that is focused more on the experiences and values that students get at college. Piccioto states that paying these athletes completely takes away from the college experience, which could therefore be used as a more moral argument rather than a financial or health related one. My group could utilize the article, as it takes an interesting side on the Pay-to-Play issue. The article opens up a new question about whether or not the NCAA would be looking out for themselves or the athletes when deciding on this compensation
So receiving thousands of dollars could lead to many different distractions from academics. Especially if balancing sports and academics is already hard enough. The NCAA states in an interview with The Chicago tribune that college athletes already earn endorsement deals and other contracts, and tend to study less that is not the only reason the NCAA has brought to be against college athletes being paid. In the same Chicago Tribune interview, the NCAA states that if an ¨athlete was being paid and it significantly changed their lifestyle," NCAA President Mark Emmert testified in a previous federal antitrust case, "they probably would not be living in a residence hall. They probably would not be eating in the cafeteria, they probably would not be as — as active a member or participant in the life of a campus."
Why College Athletes should not get Paid Wouldn't you want your college to be a fair place? College athletes are not paid because fans could lose interest if the players had been expert athletes. Paying all college athletes involves a number of tough enterprises and money, so for universities to be an awesome and fair region for all students colleges generally choose to now not to pay college athletes. College athletes need to know not to be paid because these athletes chose to be athletes, and also no one has sufficient money to pay everyone, so there could now not be any equality, however, some argue that athletes spend all their time and don’t get what they deserve returned. Different programs within the college could be erased if college athletes receive a commission consistent with maryville.edu “athletes will diminish the spirit of amateurism” this means that if students get a possibility to receive a commission at college they may never need to pick some other class which can have an effect on their future.
College sports are a multibillion-dollar industry that brings millions of fans in to watch their favorite teams or athletes play. Collegiate sports have always played a significant role in the U.S., and the debate as to whether college athletes should be paid or not has been ongoing for years. While many people believe that athletes should be paid for their hard work, as well as the significant amount of money they bring into the schools, many people also believe that they should not be paid. Although college athletes work hard, paying college athletes could lead to many negative consequences in the sport such as budget cuts in smaller income sports, athletes only playing for the money, and takes away the difference between amateur and professional athletes. Paying college athletes could lead to budget cuts in other sports or activities that don’t bring in as much money.
Will Davidson ENGL 1120 11/16/17 Major Paper III College athletics is a defining activity in American culture. Whether it is during the brisk Saturdays of fall watching the gridiron, or during the spring where the best in basketball compete for the title of the best, College Athletics is iconic for our nation. They provide relief from daily life, something to look forward to, and serve as a gathering point for friends and family to enjoy each-others company. With all college sports give back to the people, many have wondered if the athletes which make it all possible should be paid. Some argue that college athletes should remain amateurs, as that makes the unique spirit of the game different than the current pro leagues.
Ryan Vanderfords’ article published in the Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal explores this issue of whether or not college athletes should be paid beyond what they receive in scholarships. Vanderford is currently a law associate at a law firm in Los Angeles, California. He played sports throughout high school and college, so the author can relate to this topic. The payment of college athletes has become a more prominent issue in today’s society then it has been in the past. He argues that at major universities, student athletes help the school generate their revenue and therefore should be paid.
“When you pay student-athletes, you give them the chance to earn money to buy necessities in their daily life” (College Raptor). How do college athletes survive if they can not make any extra money if they are so focused on the game? “Between their games and practices they do not have time to work” (College Raptor). Many college athletes deserve to be paid because of how much dedication and time they have given to their college and the sport they play. In conclusion, athletes could focus on their sport instead of paying for rent and food.
College Athletes: Should They Get Paid? The controversial debate on whether or not collegiate athletes should be able to profit from their name, image, and likeness has been going on for as long as the brain can think. Each year, year-round, college athletics generate tens of thousands of dollars for their respective institutions, only for athletes to see none of that money. It is believed by many that the scholarships athletes receive is enough to compensate, along with the presented argument that allowing college athletes to make money makes college athletics political and takes away from integrity of the business. To oppose, not all sports give athletic scholarships, and even when they do, it still isn’t enough to compensate for an athletes’
College athletes put in a lot of time, effort, and work into the sport they’ve played since they were young, but they aren’t getting paid for it. These student athletes deserve to be paid because they put in countless hours of hard work and balance sports with school work. The first reason athletes in college do deserve to be compensated is because they don 't have time to fit in work with a school and athletic schedule. College athletes don’t have time to get a real job. Student athletes have a very busy schedule, they don’t have time to fit in a job.
he American university system has presented elite athletes with a rare opportunity. Only in the states can an individual compete at a publicized level while obtaining a college degree (“Mark Emmert”). Such combination of a commercialized business and an educational institute alludes to the debate on student athlete’s wages. However, the opposing side rises above on study-ridden research. Facts can conclude that college athletes should not be paid.
After graduating from High School one may choose to further his or her education through college. People do this for many reasons. Some people do it for professional benefits, while others do it for sports athletics. This paper will be focusing on those who do go to college for athletic benefits. Specifically, this is focusing on how these college athletes do not get paid and why they should be paid.
College sports is one of the best-known entertainments around the world. But for the athletes, they are students first then athletes second. For college student-athletes, there are a variety of scholarships and grants to help pay for college or college debt. However, some critics say that student-athletes should be paid a salary like pro athletes would, with help from scholarships or grants. The authors of, College Athletes are being Educated, not Exploited, Val Ackerman and Larry Scott, argue that student-athletes are already paid by free education and other necessities.
Imagine living in a world where you are paid to compete in an activity that you adore at a young age. Ever since I can remember, sports have been a major part of who I am. Never did the thought cross my mind of receiving a salary before making it your career. After researching the topic, authors such as Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, Ryan Swanson, and Ekow Yankah all represent different viewpoints on the controversial topic whether or not college athletes should be paid. Despite each of the authors having polar opposite views on the topic, each author is similar by using rhetorical strategies to their advantage in trying to educate and persuade their audience.
The author centers around the system of how wages would actually be worth less than that of scholarship benefits and that the increase in wage demand for athletes would put universities under financial pressure. He mentions those who support paying college athletes for their hard-earned work and those who do not when he states that “On the surface it seems ideal and fair to pay college athletes for the hours of labor they put in each week; however, it’s important to analyze the trickle down of effects such a drastic change would cause.” (Marcus) By addressing both sides of the argument, Marcus lets his readers know that he is aware of athletes deserving a salary, but remains in his stance against the topic. He refers to sports fans in particular who disregard and ignore the actual complications that would be caused if the NCAA were to pay college athletes.
Mike says”Students all over the world work hard at the sport that true love and don’t get a lot in return for it”. While college athletes may not exactly be employees, they are more than just students. Consider the life of a student-athlete, though. The average Division I football player dedicates over 43hours per week to his sport, meaning that he spends more than a typical American work-week training and playing football, in addition to his class work. Their work, which generates exorbitant amounts of money year in and year out, deserves Compensation.
College athletes have been huge in America since the early 1900s. With the emergence of social media the prevalence of college sports have increased further. There have been numerous scandals across college sports for athletes taking money for signing objects. This brings up the highly controversial debate over whether or not these athletes should be paid. Tyson Harnett addresses this topic in “Why college Athletes Should Be Paid<” when he takes a side and provides examples as a former collegiate athlete.