When debating the legalization of same sex marriage, religious reasoning and accusations of bigotry often provoke obstinance. Instead of reiterating those arguments, William J. Bennett, a prominent cultural conservative, former secretary of education, and author of The Book of Virtues, focuses on societal effects in his op-ed article, “Against Gay Marriage.” Though Bennett’s piece conveys partiality, it also attempts to discuss this issue scrupulously to ensure readers will consider his argument and perhaps accept his implications. While some of Bennett’s word choices convey tolerance of the gay community, his rhetoric incites readers to accept that preserving society requires marginalizing homosexuals. Bennett’s use of the word “discovered”
Croome writes the proposed legislation will allow “homophobia […] hate and denigration against religious or ethnic minorities, women, [and] people with disabilities,” (Croome). This invokes sympathy from the audience by highlighting the changes are against minority people groups, those unprivileged in society. The author creates the cultural representation of the marginalised as defenceless to introduce the social value of equality; he endorses the value by encouraging sympathy. Such is effective as any reader not against homophobia will surely be against xenophobia, misogyny, or ableism and it negatively portrays his opponents as condoning hate speech. On the other side of the issue of non-denominationalism, a churchly reading opposes Croome’s interpretation that a religious impunity to the current laws will cause hate and denigration, instead believing the exemption is necessary to convey scriptural teachings on family and marriage.
As same-sex marriage become legalized in America, people fighting for gay rights has achieved a great breakthrough. However, those who are against homosexuality won’t just change their hostility to gay people even though people of the same sex can be legally related now. They have strong bias on homosexual people and can list thousands of reasons, no matter reasonable or not, that gay is wrong and guilty. When talking about marriage, it’s inevitable that people will mention the children, which is an important part of a family. The anti-homosexual will always say that gay parents cannot be good parents.
In the article, “An Appeal to Maryland Voters, for my Mom”, the author Chrysovalantis P. Kefalas, shows how his argument on why the ruling of the Defense of Marriage Act to be unconstitutional, is justified. Kefalas defends this action this action to show that despite religious views, authorities and laws should not hinder others from happiness and living a life that they desire. His argument take words directly from a widely used source to show that there is reason on both the sides of the law, and religion. He appeals to the Audience’s emotions by describing personal afflictions with himself and the beliefs he once had, and how his situation has affected his life as well as his family. His use of Ethos, Pathos and Logos give his argument a natural balance that can be seen from both sides, making it strong and effective.
The traditional Muslims relate homosexuality to the sins listed in the Ten Commandments. Farley writes, “Male homosexuality is prohibited in the Qur’an (Farley 98).” The article criticizes that view and is in favor of American Muslims supporting homosexuality. Farley says that compared to Christianity, Islam is a faith that is more “sex-positive” and I believe that is the way that American Muslims are trying to practice their faith (Farley 96). Farley also discusses how important it is that before anyone criticizes a culture or faith system that they immerse themselves into the idea they are criticizing.
Max Rosner Professor Pellegrini 3 April 2023 Midterm Paper #1 “Proposition 8 – made simple” is an informational political advertisement in support of Proposition 8, a 2008 California ballot measure which attempted to overturn the legalization of same-sex marriage. “Proposition 8 – made simple” utilizes the example of two couples, Jan and Tom, and Dan and Michael, to center its argument. Although the two couples are friends, Jan and Tom still believe in traditional family values which they worry will be compromised in the wake of same-sex marriage legalization. We can see three concepts at play in this example: tolerance, the public, and religious moralism.
WILDERNESS Brien Thangaiah S.O.I: This is a narrative style story written in first person. Its main purpose is to entertain readers; the story is based around the friendship of two friends, who had their friendship broken by a sudden event. They are now stuck in the forest together, and struggling to find a way out. The story is aimed at adolescent teens.
In Bennett’s article, “Against Gay Marriage,” he is unsuccessful with who his target audience is. Identifying the target audience is essential for the content included in an article. It helps with the information included. Knowing who the target audience also helps with the argument the writer is trying to get across, or which viewpoint the writer has decided to take. A quote from Bennett’s article, “Obviously it is not always honored in practice.
In the essay “What’s Wrong with Gay Marriage?” (2003), Katha Pollitt refutes all of the reasons why people think gay marriage is wrong. The author expounds on this argument by first showing that procreation is not a requirement for marriage because there are many straight married couples who don’t have children, the next argument that is refuted is that women domesticate men, but married men and un-married men still commit suicide and still do drugs so marriage won’t change that, and the final argument that was refuted was the argument made about historical marriages, but marriage has always been here and always will be and much of historical marriages polygyny was often as well as forced, arranged, and child marriage. By refuting
Why do people have a problem with gay marriage? It is not all people who have a problem with gay marriage, but there are those who believe that gay marriage is an abomination and goes against God. Others however, believe that people are just people, and it does not matter if you are gay or not. Charles Colson believes that gay marriage is the end of the tradition of marriage; especially if gay couples are able to adopt children. Katha Pollitt however, believes that it does not matter if a couple is gay, straight, or elderly; as long as they are happy together and love one another.
Senior fellow for policy studies, Peter Sprigg in a Question and Answer article titled “What’s Wrong With Letting Same-Sex Couples Marry?” addresses this matter of controversy by stating-in his opinion- the ‘vast negative consequences’ concerning gay marriage equality. In order to answer these questions, Sprigg uses a cataloging of biased satire, as opposed to factual information in backing up his opinions. Thus, considering his audience consists of those who are for gay rights or, at the least, do not understand such a negative connotation regarding what could be an incredibly life-changing milestone for many, I am very much against his close-minded responses. Furthermore, although it is technically lnews learning that Peter Sprigg in particular thinks allowing gay couples to marry is wrong I can’t say that I’m definitively taken aback when I discover that yet another individual carries this mindset that, “Homosexual relationships are not marriage”(Sprigg P.2), though disappointing nonetheless.
In the essay "The Legacy of Antigay Discrimination," written by George Chauncey, describes how homosexuality support and views have been changed throughout history. He believes that people are not aware of the struggles homosexuals had to face other than being "scorned and ridiculed, made to feel ashamed, afraid, and alone" (260). Using facts and statistics, Chauncey is able to present a stronger argument, because everything that he presents is accessible knowledge, creating a more realistic view on the changes and struggles of homosexuals. He presents the issues that were created in the LGBT community such as, movies not being able to represent homosexuality, people being fired from federal or state jobs, bars and restaurants not providing
Opposite sex couples have always been what people consider “natural” and “normal,” which is why the institution of marriage revolves greatly around heterosexuality. Some people may believe that weddings and marriages are things created by the state to fulfil the needs of the people and grant their wishes in true happiness, when in fact, it is merely a way to legalize and reassure opposite sex relationships. William Duncan’s article, “The State Interests in Marriage,” describes how “marriage is necessary to ensure that children are brought into the world” (Duncan 164 -165) and raised properly. It is evident that one of the state’s main interest in marriage is procreation and though people do not need to be married to have children, heterosexual marriages help to provide children with the benefits of being raised by both a mother
Gallagher says that “stopping gay marriage is not victory, it is only a necessary step to the ultimate victory: the strengthening of a culture of marriage that successfully connects sex, love, children, and
There are many discussions about gay marriage. While the topic about “Gay Marriage”, Charles Colson who wrote “Gay Marriage: societal suicide”, and Katha Pollitt , the author of “What’s Wrong with Gay Marriage” has some differences such as: the idea, word choices, and tone they wrote in. They impact the audience with their idea numerously. Katha Pollitt and Charles Colson have a completely opposite idea about Gay Marriage. Katha Pollitt is the one whose essay
Depression and drug use among LGBT people have both been shown to increase significantly after new laws that discriminate against gay people are passed. Most religious people have beliefs that the LGBT community shouldn’t exist. The Bill would prevent the government from taking action against businesses that discriminate against LGBT people based on their “religious belief or moral conviction” that marriage is defined as a union solely between one man and one woman. A new poll from the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life found, not surprisingly, that opposition to gay marriage and homosexuality is highest among the most religious. homosexuality is on par with covetousness, malice, envy, murder, slander, insolence, rebellion against parents, ruthlessness, deceit, pride, and the like—not one destined to destroy society.