The despot Saddam Hussein started the Iraq war, a warmonger who overthrew the government in Iraq. The Iraqi high tribunal, in coordination with the United States assassinated President Saddam Hussein on December 30, 2006 (Britannica, 1). The United States captured Hussein and he went on trial in front of the Iraqi High Tribunal for crimes, including the murdering of 148 Shi’iahs in the village of Dujail in 1982 (PBS, 23). The assassination of Saddam Hussein was just because he rose to political power and maintained it through violent means and was a war-hungry despot, looking to conquer the Middle East; however others believe that the United States viewed him as such and that he had good intentions in mind.
Saddam Hussein’s regime of terror commenced in his ascent to political power. Joining the Ba’ath political party in Iraq in 1957, he unsuccessfully participated in the failed assassination of Iraqi prime minister at the time, Abd al-Karīm Qāsim (Britannica, 3). After attending law school in Cairo and spending time in Iraqi prison, he escaped, took leadership of the Ba’ath party and orchestrated a
…show more content…
From his actions, it is clear that Saddam Hussein was a despotic dictator who had malicious intent in mind. In his rise and sustaining of power for dominance as president, prime minister, and chairman of Iraq, he used force and violence (MacFarquhar, 43). To sustain his power and violence, he invested predominantly in military and weapons of mass destruction (MacFarquhar, 43). “Iraq had embarked on extensive projects to acquire a homegrown arsenal of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons. Iraq had also become a regional power, and Mr. Hussein expected to dominate the Arab world,” (MacFarquhar, 44). Afraid of the possibility of losing control, in 1982, he shot his health minister for proposing a cease-fire with Iran (MacFarquhar,
“Killings”, Andre Dubus’ short story, revolves around a father who seeks vengeance against his son’s killer. The story is about the murders committed by Richard Strout and Matt Fowler in their attempt to get retribution and ease the pain in their hearts. The circle of killings is first caused by the murder of Matt Fowler’s son, Frank, by Richard, which leads to the retaliatory killing of Richard, by Matt. This infinite, unforgiving circle of killings and attempts at retribution is what Dubus portrays in a nonjudgmental view. The readers are left to see how the act of killing affects Richard and Matt and decide how much their retribution costs them.
I believe that he killed those Iraqis because he was protecting his men and
The author pointed out some of the torturous ways that the Ba’th party punished the citizens, but what were some other, more modern, ways to punish for petty crimes? Additionally, the author argues that Saddam Husain was not a trailblazer of any sort instead he was an imitator. Saddam Husain saw what was going on in Europe at the time, with people being oppressed by political power and tried to make Iraq just like that. This concept was shown when Husain started making treason a large offense and intertwined it with police work.
He wanted the United states to leave the Islamic holy land, and he would do whatever it took. So, he planned numerous attacks not only on the United States, but other nations as well. In a result of those attacks, a countless number of people died or became wounded. Many of these attacks happened during 1998-2011. Even though he didn’t execute
President Carter’s diplomacy was not succeeding, the crisis was lasting much longer than anyone thought and the former president even considered the prospect of using force. The government was unwilling to return the Shah to the Iranian people and was determined to regain control and restart the money flow once more. To do
Even when the United States occupiers had a clear idea of implementations they thought could benefit the society of Iraq, international laws and other legal rules prevented them from taking action, “Although
The assassination of Osama Bin Laden occurred due to cultural reason; however, it was justified. Osama Bin Laden discriminated against americans, he caused one of the most horrific terrorist attack in american history which is 911 and he killed up to 2977 people in one day. Critics, however, some may argue that the assassination was unjustified, due to the Persian Gulf war also known as Operation Desert Shield where american troops invaded Saudi Arabia and killed over a 1000 civilians and injured even more this is a valid reason why Osama Bin Laden would have a vendetta against the american nation. The assassination of Osama Bin Laden occurred on May 2, 2011 over ballistic trauma which is a gunshot wound to the head in Abbottabad, Pakistan.
Fred Hampton was a former NAACP organizer and the chairman of the Illinois Black Panther Party. Fred Hampton was murdered due to the FBI program COINTELPRO, which targeted social and political threat organizations. Due to his impressions left on African Americans as an effective leader, the FBI wanted to eliminate Fred Hampton. One of Hampton’s accomplishments was emphasizing that racial and ethnic conflict between street gangs would be more effective if they collaborated against police brutality. In the documentary, “Eyes on the Prize: A Nation of Laws” shows that Fred Hampton is significant for how he instilled the sense of pride, dignity and self-determination in African Americans.
Some would like to argue that it was actually his Hussein’s realization that such power existed that corrupted him. They think that he wishes to return Iraq to a historical age of glory. But the real history that is important is that of the beginning of his life. In the essay Bowden recounts an interview with a journalist named Saad al-Bazzaz in which al-Bazzaz discusses the root of all of this evil.
With injustice and cruelty running rampant in the world, it is unsurprising that people become determined to make things better for tomorrow. The cliché saying that the ends justify the means is often quoted by those aware of the moral greyness of their actions. Commendable yet unreasonable, leaders whose sole purpose in life is to fix what they see as “wrong” with the world fall prey to thinking there is only ally or enemy. In the long run, they harm those they try to liberate.
In the report, “Fear-Mongering Instead of Facts” an anonymous reporter argues that fear is used to justify wars in the Middle East. Iraq is rich in natural resources, specifically oil. American leaders want this oil, but need to find a reason to take it. They find post 9/11 fears. Some leaders spread rumors that Iraq “possessed weapons of mass destruction”(Fear-Mongering).
The United States invasion of Iraq in 2003 was dubbed Operation Iraqi Freedom by US Forces, but it seemed like freedom was the last thing on their minds. Abu Ghraib prison was an occupied Iraqi prison where the US Army held mass incarcerations and sponsored inmate torture. 2007 marked the year that a documentary titled “Ghosts of Abu Ghraib” was produced by HBO and directed by Rory Kennedy. This documentary showed the abuses and injustices inured to the Iraqi prisoners at the hands of the United States Soldiers. Although the guards at Abu Ghraib Prison Complex had personal reservations against the treatment of the prisoners, they were manipulated into authoritarianism by their overzealous obedience.
The invasion of Iraq echoes the ideological view of Woodrow Wilson, immediately following World War I. In Wilson’s opinion, his Liberal Internationalism was a cure-all end-all to conflicts between nations. His matrix of diagnoses and prescriptions
William McKinley once said, “That’s all a man can hope for during his lifetime, to set an example, and when he is dead, to be an inspiration for history.” Any person who has changed the course of history is a man worth remembering, and William McKinley is one of those people. William McKinley, before his assassination, was one honorable stepping stone, set in place, to make our great the country the place it is today. His assassination rocked every state across our big, wide country and it made people uncertain of the future, a future without their beloved President McKinley. At the time, this was the third assassination of a president in a span of thirty-six years, and the loss of William McKinley is one that will go down in history and
And that is all. And mark this. Let either of you breathe a word, or the edge of a word, about the other things, and I will come to you in the black of some terrible night and I will bring a pointy reckoning that will shudder you” (Act 1) to accept the whipping punishment for dancing instead of hanging and death for witching. Likewise, after the brutal attacks of the September 11th, the United State of America administration delivered strong beliefs of incorrect proclamations regarding Iraq ties to the terrorist group, Al-Qaeda, and assuring the American publics and the entire word Saddam’s, Iraq dictator at that time, possessions of weapons of mass destruction (WMD).