The main view of the political party is that this country succeeds when everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the rules. They claim their economy is built to lift up all Americans, not just aid those at the top. The Democratic Party puts great emphasis on job creation, equal pay, education, health care, and clean energy. They believe on strict regulations on the
The Electoral College system assures balanced power between the states, puts the independent parties under control, grants balanced voting, and supports the major political parties. The Electoral College has proven itself to be very sufficient in determining the president and the vice president of the United States. Since this system has been successful since our Founding Fathers created it, there should be no reason as to why we should get rid of the Electoral
States represent the people’s voice in the election because popular vote isn’t important in the Electoral College. There have been numerous times where the candidate with the popular vote has lost because of the state’s power. Document 7 has the 2016 Presidential Election Electoral Vote Map and Projection, it had the democrats winning 237 electoral votes. To the 187 republican votes, this gave democrats the upper hand in the prediction. With this prediction it also connected with the popular vote because Clinton had the popular vote won.
The foundation of the United States voting process has always been electoral; does it benefit the People of the United States is the question. Throughout time the electoral voting method has helped include the people’s votes toward those states but, not their states endgame. The votes of the majority (people) are not the main
The people of the United States want their political leaders to pay attention, yet use their best judgment, knowledge and power to do so as well. Ultimately, it falls down to whoever can successful accomplish what the people seek of them. Your primary goal to remain in Congress is to fulfill all or at least most of the people’s desires. Three elements need to be done in order to ensure your re-election. One, advertising.
It is functioned around making sure the people’s vote does not go to waste. As Turner said in his article, “...most call for the winning candidate to receive a popular plurality (forty percent is often mentioned) and a run-off election if that is not achieved” (414). Run-Off was made so if a vote for a certain candidate became no longer valid, as in they dropped out or got voted out, the vote would still matter and it would go onto the individual 's next suggested candidate. “Wouldn’t it be an intolerable strain to the American political system, giving rise to popular outrage and contempt… that sometime again a man with fewer popular votes than his opponent is the electoral winner? I doubt it…” (Bayh 169).
Since higher populated states have more electoral votes, many believe that the lower populated areas will be neglected. According to Robert Speel, a political author from Time magazine, Presidential candidates will still focus on the states where they can get the most electoral votes, which are the higher populated states. Robert Speel earned his Ph.D in political science from Cornell University and Bachelors from The University of Pennsylvania. In fact, Penn State University published his book, Changing Patterns of Voting in the Northern United States. Speel believes that presidential candidates typically campaign in at most 12 states based on the amount of electoral votes from those states.
State Rep. Randy Dunn D-Kansas City, has filed House Bill 497, which would adopt an agreement to elect the President of the United States by the nation popular vote instead of by the decision of the Electoral College. House Bill No. 497 comes in response to outdated and unjust Electoral College system. “Every Missourians’ vote should count the same,” said Dunn. “Whoever the majority votes for that given person should be the victor.
This week’s lesson gave me more clarity on the-the Electoral College. It was confusing at first to hear that the popular vote does not win an election. Bush lost the popular votes, but won the electoral vote in 2000, cleared by the Supreme Court (POLS201). I think it is better for the candidate to worry about the crucial electoral votes than the popular votes. According to POL201 lesson book, former Senator John Kerry in 2004 and Al Gore 2000 had the victories in California, but Bush won both elections.
According to the statistic of We the people, “most members of Congress are elected in landslide elections, and why 98 percent of incumbents are re-elected.” (385). It is actually hard for new candidates to win and replace incumbents because of redistricting. In other words, the results are almost in the desire of legislators, so the voting of citizens looks wasting time and money and does not express their right in the election. The purpose of election to look for the winner with the highest rate of votes, but gerrymandering interrupts that purpose and drives the result into their bias parties. Therefore, the election in America does not prove that it is a democracy country as far as existing gerrymandering.