“Where do babies come from?” Every child at one point or another will ask this classic question. Depending on the age of the child, some parents will tell the story of the stork, or if they feel it is morally wrong to lie to their child, they will just say “when two people love each other.” Sooner or later, either through mischievous friends or eventually from their parents, a child will learn the biological development of a baby. They then believe this is the only way a baby is created- simple and easy. However, reproduction is the exact opposite of simple and easy. In some cases, the male and/or female may be infertile. There are numerous causes of infertility, for example: hormonal imbalance, environmental conditions, autoimmune disorders, …show more content…
In many countries, it is illegal to create a designer baby, but in the United States, there is no law against it (Knoepfler, The Ethical Dilemma of Designer Babies, TedTalk). In his TedTalk, “The Ethical Dilemma of Designer Babies,” stem cell and genetics researcher, Paul Knoepfler, states the long-term risks of designer babies, describing it as “a kinder, gentler, positive eugenics.” He also touches on government involvement in this researcher; “I also think it 's not that unlikely that governments might start taking an interest in genetic modification. So for example our imagined GM Jenna child who is healthier, if there 's a generation that looks like they have lower healthcare costs, it 's possible that governments may start trying to compel their citizens to go the GM route.” I agree with many points Knoepfler makes in his TedTalk. I am not comfortable with the idea of creating designer babies- we do not know what else this could lead to. Knoepfler states, “We should not allow creating genetically modified people,because it 's just too dangerous and too unpredictable.” From the Natural Law perspective, it is interfering with the natural and beautiful process of creating life. It is humans trying to play God. As someone who believes in the good that science brings, I feel that risk designer babies bring outweigh the benefits. It will cause a divide in our society where “traditional” children will be consistently compared to genetically modified children, and it may force people to choose to Personally, I would not be comfort with participating in any assisted reproduction processes. The creation of life is sacred and should be respected and performed in the way God
Click here to unlock this and over one million essays
Show MoreThe issue of modification through gene manipulation becomes increasingly complex when considering how this technology can be used as a means to unethical and harmful uses. In the article, Babies with Genes From 3 people could be Ethical, Panel Says, Rob Stein exposes various concerns about three gene donors in an embryo, including how a scientist, “Could introduce some new disease into the human gene pool or that scientists could try to do this for other reasons-nonmedical reasons, like create designer babies where parents pick the traits of their children.” Stein goes on to explain how the gene replacement procedure would take place, which continues to usher in a plethora of concerns as whether to allow Crispr technology be tested on a embryo.
Also the technology isn’t 100% safe yet as it’s only in the experimental stage still. Therefore I don’t think we should be allowed to genetically modify our children because there’s a greater possibility of accidentally “killing” the offspring than having them as the parents mix of their own
Doing the procedure undermines evolution and could even reverse it. The reason humans have been so popular in terms of surviving and reproducing is due to the genetic diversity given to them from two million years of evolution. Now, not everyone will look exactly the same, but most will be pretty, healthy, and smart because almost everyone has the same idea of what a “better” human is (“Designer Babies: The Good and the Bad”). Almost no parent who would go through with the procedure would choose an ugly and dumb child.
This unit has greatly increased my knowledge of genetic technology, and my understanding of different perspectives on the ethicality of its use. Unlike somatic cell therapy (treating genetic disorders by replacing genes in certain body cells of living people), which has gained extensive approval for clinical uses on humans, germ-line gene therapy (GGT) is a far more controversial method of performing genetic engineering on an unborn embryo, to change all of the DNA that will make up that baby as it grows up. In my detailed study of GGT, where I went into quite extensive learning on the full process of recombinant DNA and genome editing (with technology like CRISPR), I discovered that the general public fear the capabilities of GGT in creating
Countries around the world all have different takes on genetic engineering. According to the article “Designer Babies: An Ethical Horror Waiting to Happen”, “Most countries
A designer baby is a baby that is created through in vitro where you get to choose the genetic makeup of your baby. You can choose the physical characteristics, the gender, and even lower disease risks. I understand this concept best by imaging myself picking a baby out of a catalog. The idea of designer babies used to be a far fetched idea until our technology advanced. Once we came to the twenty-first century, what used to be fiction, became a reality (Ly, 2013).
Some of my reasons are it can increase the human lifespan by 30 years, can help prevent genetic diseases, and it reduces the risk of diabetes and cancer. (“list”). Based on the evidence I found I know believe that designer babies are good because a designer baby can be protected from genetic diseases. If you can prevent a genetic diseases from happening that would be a good thing. The evidence I use to support this is there are all sorts of genetic diseases the one I learned about is genetic blindness.
There are so many pros and cons to go over so let’s begin with the pros. The pros of having a designer baby are that the can reduce the risk of genetic diseases. This means that the baby will have a less chance of getting diseases more than others. Also they can reduce the risk of inherited medical conditions. So whatever the generation of the parents had the baby won’t have the parent choose the baby not to have.
No collection of mortal men should be put in charge of who is worthy of reproducing or not. Eugenics was not formally put into effect for a reason. Other routes can be taken to improve the future generations without depriving the living humans of their right to have
The only way to promise that the future of the whole entire world is in good hands is to put this ¨terrifying weapon in the hands of the unscrupulous,¨ since they´re the only ones that get things done( The Daily Mail) . Designer babies promise wealthy individuals a good-looking child they deserve. Ugly people are often poor so once the planet is rid of them, then designer babies can finally take over, allowing pretty people to rightfully rule the
Who 's Afraid Of Designer Babies", 2005). What is the ethical question posed in these two videos at YouTube? A few of the ethical questions that were directly related to the work of scientists and gene therapy are: Laurie Zoloth,
Do you know what designer babies are? Well I’m going to tell you what it is. A designer baby is a baby that has been selected for a purpose to remove a particular defect. How are they created you may ask?
As technology advances, more things become possible. One of these things is genetically modifying a baby, this is very wrong. Genetic modifying or genetic engineering is altering someone or something’s DNA. Scientists hope to cure diseases with this method but doing this can lead to some harmful effects. This process is very unethical.
The chances of failure is low and they can also be used to balance out gender dominance. Storrs quotes Dr. Mark Sauer on this when he said, "Despite these concerns, there is currently no evidence that it is unsafe, Sauer said. ' But when you 've got millions of babies (who were screened in this way), you get less and less concerned that you are doing harm, '". People have a right to worry but the evidence shows that designer babies won 't cause health problems or gender
Have you ever had to go to extreme measures in order to reproduce? Many people in today’s society often face this problem but is it a good idea to use reproductive technology in order to reproduce? Yes it is if this is the only way in order for people who want a family to have one this is there only option. There are many different reproductive technologies including Zift, Gift,Tese/tesa, ICSI and the most popular option IVF. IVF (In vitro fertilization ) is where an egg is fertilised with sperm outside of the human body in a laboratory.