ipl-logo

Summary: The Importance Of Diversity In The Supreme Court

607 Words3 Pages

WHAT is this story about? List two important facts from the article. The story discusses the apparent lack of diversity in the Supreme Court and how diversity could strengthen and bring different perspectives to the court. 1. One important fact is that all members of the Supreme Court graduated from just three Ivy League law schools. All nine justices, either attended Yale or Harvard University. 2. Another fact, is none of the members are Protestant. Not a single one, is an evangelical Christian or a Protestant of any other denomination. Majority of them are either Catholic, Roman Catholic, or Jewish. WHY is this story important? The story is important, since it highlights a significant argument about increasing diversity among the members in the Supreme Court. Justice Kagan, mentioned that bringing diversity into consideration, would promote assurance from the public. Since, they could relate more to the members and share similar experiences. …show more content…

I also learned that the Supreme court has a common goal. However, in this article it issued that diversifying its members, could help bring different outlooks, to assure that the laws are carried out correctly and faithfully. This article is significant to not only me, but to our continuously growing diverse population, as well. The Supreme Court’s decisions have a major say in the statutory laws of the country. So, of course we, the public, want the court to decide with the same opinions and values as we do. Our country is a democracy; we want our viewpoints to be evident in the representation in the court. Their finalized solutions, are going to affect how we run our lives in this society, and what rules we must conform to in order to remain a stable and peaceful country. Diversity is needed in this particular court, in order to maintain order and agreeance to issues containing various groups of

Show More
Related

  • Pittonia Case Summary

    2098 Words  | 9 Pages

    For this institution Pittonia will draw inspiration from the Canada. Canada’s court system is comprised of four tiers; the provincial and territorial lower courts, the provincial and territorial superior courts, the appellate courts, both regional and federal, and the Canadian Supreme Court (“Canada’s Court System”). By using a method such as this Pittonia will ensure that all areas needing judicial guidance are overseen. Borrowing more from the Canadian system, and not another similar one, such as the American system, Pittonia’s courts are all unified, and the Supreme Court retains the final authority, unlike in the American system, where states can interpret state laws as they see fit. With such a diverse population, it is necessary in some areas to have strict uniformity, so that there can be no dissent with interpretations between regions.

    Read More

  • Is The Question Of Constitutional Authority In Footnote 4 Of Carolene Products?

    1241 Words  | 5 Pages

    In order to uphold the constitution, the Supreme Court must always aim to balance power among the branches of government and not overstep boundaries in exercising its own power. For this reason, the debate over handling political questions in the courtroom

    Read More

  • Sonia Sotomayor's Justice Court

    229 Words  | 1 Pages

    Sonia Sotomayor Sonia Sotomayor was the first Hispanic nominee for the Justice Court. I think she is a great person and I’d like to be like her one day. Sonia Sotomayor was born on June 25th, 1954 in The Bronx, New York. Her father died when she was 9, he was also an alcoholic.

    Read More

  • Chief Justice John Marshall: The Balance Of Power In The United States

    504 Words  | 3 Pages

    The founding father’s idea when they created the Constitution was to prevent a centralized government. As expressed by James Madison in Federalist No. 51, they believe that the power surrendered by people would be divided between the federal and state governments, creating balance of power that would enable both governments to control each other. Over time, the balance of power between the federal and state governments has shifted in favor of the federal government and this has taken place with the help of the Constitution and by enactments of Congress. The role that Chief Justice John Marshall played in defining the power of the federal and state governments during the early 19th century is important to mention because he shaped the nation.

    Read More

  • Ethos In The Lyceum Address Summary

    439 Words  | 2 Pages

    The rule of law is reflected as a core principle of our nation and vital to ordered liberty. To rightly govern the American rule of law it is essential to acknowledge the continuity between the American Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution. The United States of America “government” is framed by these two important documents. The principles of the Declaration of Independence constitute the foundation of the government based on the universal equality of all human beings, and the U.S. Constitution founds the political process that is to be followed by the elected officials in governing the people. One cannot be without the other; both are essential for a stable government.

    Read More

  • Term Limits In The Supreme Court

    339 Words  | 2 Pages

    This shows that term limits in the Supreme Court became more important. For example, if they have more mature members, they would understand the law, and would understand the politics and their decisions on the society. Mr. Ingraham stated

    Read More

  • Summary Of Gerald Rosenberg's Book 'The Hollow Hope'

    710 Words  | 3 Pages

    Alex Frost Values: Law & Society 9/23/2014 The Hollow Hope Introduction and Chapter 1 Gerald Rosenberg begins his book by posing the questions he will attempt to answer for the reader throughout the rest of the text: Under what conditions do courts produce political and social change? And how effective have the courts been in producing social change under such past decisions as Roe v. Wade and Brown v. Board of Education? He then works to define some of the principles and view points 'currently' held about the US Supreme court system.

    Read More

  • The Constrained Court

    429 Words  | 2 Pages

    Courts are also aware of popular opinion, and are unlikely to “support significant

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of A Latina Judge's Speech

    1406 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Rhetorical Strategies of a Latina Judge's Speech To End the Lack of Representation Throughout the diversity in the United States, there is a multitude of factors that underestimate and terminate the presence or idea of women and minorities in government roles. In current times, awareness of gender equality and excluded minorities has rose to an all- time high. Many are advocating that the way our country sees and treats intersectionality needs to change for the better. Judge Sonia Sotomayor is an advocator by spreading this public announcement through a piece of a speech. She discusses the obstacles she and other minorities face to place higher on the social ladder and to be represented during a speech at the Judge Mario G. Olmos Memorial

    Read More

  • Mcdonald V. Chicago Case Study

    971 Words  | 4 Pages

    There have been many cases where the Supreme Court has had to make a decision, and most of the time it is an almost split decision.

    Read More

  • Stonewall Riots Essay

    648 Words  | 3 Pages

    This is evident since the judicial branch cannot enforce power, it cannot approach matters, but matters have to seek the judiciary, and public opinion influences the court’s decisions to a great extent. When the President and Congress think that

    Read More

  • Merit Plan Pros And Cons

    694 Words  | 3 Pages

    The appointment of judges has become clearly political. It is not uncommon to hear of candidates making statements with regards to contested political issues as well as the use of partisan language. According to (Bannon, 10) “For neutral arbiters, this heightened political temperature risks exacerbating pressures to decide cases based on political loyalty or expediency, rather than on their understanding of the law.” The selection of judges through popular election therefore suffers serious flaws since the electorate tend to base their decisions on charm instead of serious determinants. The results can be that the person elected as a judge turns out to be one who falls short of the glory of this office in terms of experience, legal training and education.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Judicial Selection Methods

    462 Words  | 2 Pages

    When people think of a good judge they typically think of somebody who is fair, not bias and has some sort of experience. However, in today’s society, particularly in the United States, our judicial selection methods are not made to select judges on their ability to reason well and rule impartially (Carter and Burke, 6). On top of that, judges have no actual training before they become part of the judiciary. The only training they receive is in school when they are studying the law. Sometimes when they pursue an apprenticeship with a judge they also get a little bit more experience or insight into a judge’s job.

    Read More

  • Supreme Court Justice Research Paper

    517 Words  | 3 Pages

    2. To reduce Partisanship of the court the American public can express their thoughts representively. The people can vote, so whomever they choose has an opportunity to change the biases

    Read More

  • Essay On Judicial Selection

    801 Words  | 4 Pages

    This may cause a judge to render a decision based on obligation instead of holding true to their beliefs. This pressure is not easily felt as intensely by appointed judges, especially those with lengthy terms. In considering the equity of the pros and cons it is my opinion that the existing system in place works best. Every system is flawed.

    Read More

More about Summary: The Importance Of Diversity In The Supreme Court

Open Document