Introduction
Realism is one of the oldest philosophies of western culture dating back to ancient Greece. It is a counterproposition of ‘Idealism.’ For someone who believes in realism, precision becomes important; and precision comes from science.
Realism can be broken down into three components: Metaphysics, Epistemology, and Axiology.
Realists trust the world of nature and physical things; and do so through experiences based on how they perceived those physical things. This essentially leads a realist to believe that reality is composed of two things – matter and form. For example, when posed the question, “If a tree falls and nobody is around to hear it, does it make a sound?” A realist would say, “Yes, it does.”
Realists claim that they
…show more content…
So, he must think about how to get to his enemy before his enemy gets to him.
Sun Tzu realism thrives upon preemption because the assumption is that the other people or entities are characteristically aggressive at any given moment. And the only way to survive is to let go of moral rules to be able to see the way to victory. And even more importantly, leaders must let go of their own idealistic self-conception because glory and honor are not as important as victory.
Today, Sun Tzu’s principles has gained worldwide acceptance beyond the military into the dynamic and fast-paced world of business where participants fully armed with blazing-fast gadgets and cutting-edge morale to aid competitiveness, and to find efficient and effective use for scarce
…show more content…
Interesting Facts about Sun Tzu
In the age of bloody civil war several thousands of years ago, Sun Tzu, a Chinese military commander, strategist, and philosopher emerged. After successfully defending the state of Wu against its neighbor to the west, Chu, a book formerly known as “Master Sun’s Military Methods” was born – which later become known as the “The Art of War.”
The “Art of War” is the most influential treatise on war ever written consisting of 13 chapters, each of which is devoted to one aspect of warfare. It has shaped the way in which conflicts are being fought for thousands of years, from the Japanese Samurai to the Napoleonic War.
Not only has the book influenced military commanders and generals all over the world, it has had resounding effects on politics, sports, and business to this day.
Sun Tzu had an wholistic philosophy that if you studied thoroughly and followed correctly, you will be victorious in any conflict. For example, Sun Tzu says, “Avoid what is strong and strike at what is weak.” – Sun
Hsun Tzu as a great scholar and philosopher was born 300 BCE in North Central China. He argues that for one to become virtue, he or she should change the feelings and behavioral trails of all mankind. He was also a spoke person of education and articulated that by extreme training and loyalty to learning could result in virtue. In addition, he relates the process of teaching a child the right way to live as being difficult, but if done properly the process will live forever and will transfer from generation to another generation. In other word, he was a brilliant Chinese philosopher who wrote figuratively and base his writing on situation of the real world that could be easily argued.
This means not how we see things or are prospective but how things really are. Reality is unbiased platform that isn’t defined to a specific person. It does not depend on any one-person experience but what is there.
When talking about war, there are many books with few answers to what war truly is. Barbara Ehrenreich brings forth not only the possibilities towards understanding war but also the passion people from history have had towards it. One key issue she brings to light is humanities love for war, so much so that people would use excuses like holy wars to justify their need to fight in a war. She declares that war is as muddled as the issue of diseases and where diseases came from around 200 years ago. More so than that she even goes further on to state that these rituals that date back to prehistoric times are the cause of human nature during times of war rather than human instinct.
Can an antiquated lens provide an adequate examination and understanding of modern warfare? The theories of Carl von Clausewitz retain remarkable contemporary merit and relevance in explaining the critical elements affecting warfare in the modern era. Carl von Clausewitz’s theories of war endeavor to be comprehendible, comprehensive, and strategic. Clausewitz contends that the conduct of war itself is without doubt very difficult. But the difficulty is not that erudition and great genius are necessary to understand the basic principles of warfare.1 Clausewitz 's 1812 essay, the Principles of War, offers military commanders, with little campaign experience, a comprehendible, comprehensive, and strategic model for attaining victory in battle.
Interestingly, Captain Kirk displayed examples of liberalism and realism simultaneously. It is these actions of the two warring enemies in which the conflict begins and appropriately ends. To move on, the theories of realism and liberalism must be expounded upon. Realism, as a theory, deals with how the world is perceived, and it predominantly focuses on the true nature of man. The state of the world is anarchy according to this theory.
Lao-Tzu’s writing is mainly based off the religion Taoism. This type of religion believes that the way of the universe is the natural way of life and that it shouldn’t be interfered with by man. Lao-Tzu believes that one shouldn’t have total control of the government, that everything should run its course as it is supposed to do not as the humans want to make it. He believes that the ruler should be carefree and should not rule forcefully but be kind and silent. That he should stay in the shadows
The theory unleashes such dynamic forces that from the time of its inception up till now it has governed the international system of the world however things one day itself fall apart. The Realists mark the State as the locus of different international circles and these sovereign states have vested interests which are always selfish. Realism is a heartless theory, man is not supposed to be selfish in the way exaggerated by the Realist thinker however [he] is a seeker of knowledge and what so ever he stumbles upon, he keeps
Qin Shi Huang-di is often regarded as a great leader within history. However, he was also paranoid and got rid of anyone who disagreed with him, but without Qin, there might be no China. Furthermore, despite his mixed reputation today, he brought six warring kingdoms together to form the basis of a country that has lasted to this day, an impressive feat that was a huge turning point in Chinese history. Qin’s effect on China and by default, on the other countries of the world was enormous. In fact, his dynasty, the Qin dynasty, even gave China its name (“Shi Huangdi Becomes Emperor”).
Introduction In Chapter 1, Sun Tzu has started his guidance from a brief introduction. He states it is the most importance significance of war planning ought to be "completely considered," that its result implies the distinction amongst survival and destroy of the country. Besides, he also discusses about the way of war planning. From this planning, the three aspects are including which are two sides’ situation, winning condition and the ability of leader.
4.0 An Explanation of Realism, Liberalism, Constructivism and Post-Structuralism. 4.1 Realism Realism or political realism prioritizes national interests and security concerns in addition to moral ideology and social reconstruction. The term is often associated with political power. The term is often associated with political power. Realism believes that the state is the main actor of the most important in determining the direction of a country.
A realist theory would suggest that states are the only relevant actors in international politics. Realists believe that since there is no central authority to govern these
Idealists see realism as a set of assumptions about how and why states behave like they do, rather than a theory of foreign relations. They strongly criticise the realist thesis that the struggle for power and security is natural. They reject such a fatalistic orientation claiming that power is not natural, and simply a temporary phase of human history. They believe that by adhering completely and consciously to moral values moral values in behaviour, power struggle and war can be eliminated.
The current work is meant to explain the differences and similarities between the most dominant theories in international relations, Realism and Liberalism, both theories have some similarities and differences but much more important and interesting is to discuss and explain what differs and makes similar both theories. Conflicts and wars, Similarities and differences between Realism and Liberalism: Both Liberalism and Realism believes that there is no world government that can prevent countries to go to war on one another. For both theories military power is important and both Realism and Liberalism can understand that countries can use military power to get what they need or want. Also, both theories are conscious that without military
Therefore, it provides differences between the status quo power and progressive states, while maintaining and emphasizing the importance of government at the same time. In contrary, Structural Realism is more concerned on ensuring their survival, by seeking and maintaining that power. Structural Realism would treat states as they are black boxes: they are assumed to be alike (Mearsheimer). Furthermore, Classical Realism and Structural Realism differ in their views of interconnection in international politics, fundamentally what causes the observed outcomes in relations among states. Classical Realists believe that the international world is one of interacting states, and causes run in one direction.
Just as Naturalism comes on the Educational scene as a protest against systems of education that have become artificial. Realism appears to be a reaction against curricula consisting of studies that have become bookish, sophisticated and a abstruse. As we have a slogan in Naturalism- ‘ Back to Nature ‘ – in Realism we have a slogan-‘ Things rather than words ‘. Idealism deals with ‘mind and Self ,’ Naturalism emphasizes ‘Matter and Physical world’, and pragmatism ‘Refuses to speculate and transcend beyond experience ‘. And according to Realism the external world of objects is not imaginary.