The overall goal, or ends, of defeating Germany first, before defeating Japan, was agreed upon. The British argued for the earliest possible defeat of Germany over diverting forces to the Pacific. Eventually, allied leaders agreed that the way to defeat Germany first began with the strategy to fight in the Mediterranean theater. This included the invasion of Sicily and Italy before a cross-channel attack into Europe. The Combined Bomber Offensive and antisubmarine warfare were given priority as strategic concepts, or ways, to achieve allied objectives.
Therefore, Napole-ons approach to battle was unexpected and surprising to adversary. John R. Elting writes in his book that Napoleon’s favourite strategy was ‘to envelop one of the en-emy army’s flanks and threaten its rear and communications, forcing it either to retire hurriedly or turn and fight at disadvantage’ (1997, pp. 529 - 530). This might not be the precise practice Napoleon applied specifically fighting the Battle of Austerlitz; however, it illustrates Napoleon’s intention and military genius to exploit enemy weakness at the emergence of such opportunity. That was enabled by preposition-ing- and manoeuvrability of the French forces, and holding sufficient reserves, which were ordered to battle at the right moment.
Cmdr. Joseph Rochefort and the U.S.’s overall superior strategies of Nimitz and Fletcher was the true reason for why the U.S.’s seemingly impossible victory became possible. The two key themes that I will focus analysis on is the failures in the Japanese strategic planning and execution at Midway and U.S. determination and resilience to keep pushing on even after things, especially with USS carriers leading up to and during the actual war was falling apart. Symonds begins to argue his case by dissecting Japan’s plans for conquest and domination in the Pacific. He starts with looking at the Japanese failure by several of their military philosophies.
With the uprising of Germany, and the beginning of submarine warfare, the Allies used “tactical and technical innovation” (pg 62) to gain a victory against the Japanese Navy, further elaborating on Overy’s more than combat outlook. In chapter three, we see wars becoming more intense. Hitler made the decision to attack Russia over Britain because he did not want to make enemies with Britain, and with Russia he had a greater chance of the outcome ending in his favor. With the Battle of Kursk, the Russian submarine’s success became, according to Overy, “the most important single victory of the war” (pg. 96).
His works and ideas are immense as they formed the basis of military strategy not only in the ancient periods but also in modern warfare. His book The Art of War consists of 13 chapters, each dealing with different but related strategies for winning a war. The given book is one of the oldest treatises based on military strategy, appearing to be the first attempt of writing on planning and subsequent execution of military procedures on rational basis (Pars, 2013). According to Pars (2013), Tzu employs a wide range of tactics and ideas in military undertakings. They include aspects such as surprise, alliance disruption, divide and conquer, use of spies, attack by fire, tactic variation, energy, as well as laying plans, which considerably help to wage war.
But when the war became a reality it was evident immediately that artillerymen were not ready to deal with close combat, and under General H.J Hunt would have to adapt their crew drills and reorganize if they were to survive and continue to be a contributing member of the force. Napoleon Bonaparte Napoleon capitalized on the potential of Field Artillery by using it as an offensive weapon system. He could reach out and attack from a distance without placing his artillery assists at risk. Back then the range of his cannons was only 300 to 400 yards, while the muskets used by his enemy was no more than 150 yards. This was not the case during the Civil War as upgraded technology and weapons allowed Soldiers to engage with effective fire
The first plan of action I need to take is always making sure I am at the right place of duty at the right time or atleast 10 min prior which is practiced in the Military. This is basic soldiering that is too easy to ensure, and it will
In order to analyze these three aspects, Sun Tzu had proposal the five fundamental factors, along with seven elements. Therefore, Sun Tzu had elaborated the meaning by each of these five factors, which are moral influence, weather, terrain, commander and discipline. For the principle factor, political is inspire people to share the same visions, ideas and expectations with the leader. The weather refers the changes in climate conditions. Therefore, terrain is about situation, distant or immediate, difficult or easy, opportunities and risks and then the command is the capability and attitude of the leader to manage the country.
The first reason being the pressure from Eisenhower’s superior in the United States to coordinate and send off a team of highly trained paratroopers. “Then, Montgomery had long been advising Eisenhower on the folly of a broad-front strategy, for that many military leaders in history had lost their hard-earned initiative by failing to concentrate their forces. This would allow Montgomery to launch his assault on the industrial heartland of Germany and end the war by Christmas.” (Greenarce 284) General Dwight D Eisenhower was the commander of the operation which would take over the land campaign from
According to him, one should do war when less likelihood of monsoon.King should use spies this will definitely help him to win the war. Kautilya thinks that mind should work more than hands everything during war depend upon mind game if the king is good in making strategies like what is the best time,place etc to attack he can win every fight. ' 'Three main types of weapons are prescribed and seem actually to have