Sunbeam Case Summary

Athletic Director Bob Marcus has quite the challenge in allocating the athletic department funds appropriately throughout all the programs within Oakbend Senior High School. After critically analyzing the case study it was quite clear some sports such as football and girls basketball received much more funding compared to other sports such as cross country and track and field. Throughout this case brief an effective solution that is both fair and in line with the districts mission will be expanded on to assist Bob Marcus is making the necessary budget cuts to provide a successful athletic program in the future.

Sunbeam Television Corporation v. Marilyn A. Mitzel Broadcast journalist Marilyn A. Mitzel won her court case against the Sunbeam Television Corporation and received a substantial amount of compensation, about $1 million in reparations (House 1). Mitzel believed the television station in which she worked, WSVN Fox 7 discriminated against her age when she was fired in 2005. Her career as a news anchor reporting for WSVN-TV began in 1988 and lasted for 17 years on a contract-basis (Sunbeam v. Mitzel). Every two or three years, her contracts would be renewed under the sole license of Sunbeam until February of 2005. The Sunbeam corporation had the power to program, future and present broadcasts as predetermined by the contracts.

Ever wondered how the Civil Rights Movement came into play? Many Supreme Court cases have influenced the Civil Rights movement by making equal and unequal laws for the blacks making people fight harder for what they believed in. Cases like the Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) case, the Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) case, and the Brown v. Board of Education (1954) case. All three of these cases played a big role in influencing the Civil Rights movement.

1. Is the Court correct? Explain your reasoning The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed the lower courts approval of the drug checkpoint saying, “the checkpoint contravened the Fourth Amendment” (Cornell University Law School LII, 2000). The United States Supreme Court affirmed that decision stating that the, “checkpoint program was indistinguishable from a general interest crime control” (Cornell University Law School LII, 2000) that violated the Fourth Amendment.

In November 1997, Casey Martin, a highly talented, professional golfer, filed a suit against the PGA tour. The first hearing took place in the United States District Court in Oregon with a case title Casey Martin, Plaintiff v. PGA Tour, Inc., Defendant (984 F.Supp. 1320). Casey Martin has a rare degenerative circulatory disorder in his right leg that inhibits his ability to walk naturally and can cause severe pain. Martin’s disorder is classified as a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. During the 1997 PGA golf tour, Martin was denied a request to use a golf cart during the third round of the tournament to accommodate his special needs. The tournament rules prohibit competitors to use golf carts during the third round. Martin filed a suit under Title III of the ADA, which

Dustin Seal, a junior at Powell High School, Knoxville, TN drove his mom’s car to Friday-night football game with his friends who had put a knife in the glove compartment without his information. Over a suspicion of drinking alcohol, school vice principal searched Dustin’s car and found a hunting knife. Being unaware of the knife Dustin got suspended with pending expulsion from Powell high by the principal. Following with several appeal processes School board sided with the school principal on expelling Dustin. His father sued the school board for violation of Dustin’s right under fourth and fourteenth amendments to Federal court ruled in favor of Seal and the case was settled with $30,000 award to Dustin. six months after the award Unfortunately

You Will Be The Judge Facts: The case involves a 12 year old child named Griffin Grimbly who told the teacher that he was beaten with a clothesline by his father Mr.Gimli. In court, the Mr.Gimli argued that he was devoted to Christian and was following the Biblical injunction on child rearing, “Spare the rod and spoil the child”, as well as arguing that s 43 of the criminal code gives parents the right to use “reasonable force” in disciplining their children. Issue: Is Mr. Grimbly is guilty of or not guilty of assault ? Held: Mr.Grimbly is guilty of assault.

Court proceeding and judgment change eventually with time. Every case that is heard within the court system might potentially alter court proceedings that follow. The courts up hold the law and make sure that the defense and prosecution abide by it for a clear judgment. After reading Case No. 09-3133 REGINALD MEEKS v. DAVID MCKUNE, and Case No. 05-5049 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CONRAD DOMINIC POOLE, law that protect the defendant are up held in court if there is reason to believe an error in conviction has occurred. If applying to appeal to the court’s decision and it’s valid it will be heard.

I’ve got some feedback on Barron’s draft: 36-521.02.B – This subsection says we can hold the patient while the screening agency (SA) reviews the application, which is good. However, we want to hold the patient while we make the application to the SA, too. We’d be fine with a timeframe for the hospital to make the application. 36-521.02.D – We have two comments here. 1) As drafted, the subsection says that if a Certificate of Hold is issued by the SA then a hospital can hold a patient for 9 hours, once medically cleared, while waiting for transport to the SA.

Lahijani & Edelson LLP New York Attorney for Defendant: Saleh AlJurbua UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SALLY SELLER, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. BILLY BUYER Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff. 17-cv-1234 NOTICE OF MOTION PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, upon the annexed Affidavit of Billy Buyer, and Exhibit (A) annexed hereto, the accompanying Memorandum of Law, and all prior papers and proceedings herein, request that this Court dismiss Plaintiff Breach of contract claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ---------------------------------- Lahijani & Edelson LLP

1. Summary: I find SFC Picart, Gregory liable for the loss of property valued at $78,415.72. The property identified in the DD 200 is no longer accountable, as a result of SFC Picart’s failure to maintain positive control of government equipment. Therefore, I assess his actions as simple negligence, as senior NCO (i.e. previous hand receipt holder) demonstrated by his blatant disregard of the Army CSPD property accountability protocols/measures. As such accountability documentation (sub hand receipts), improper custodial transfer of equipment and failure to conduct routine inventories has directly attributed to the loss of the aforementioned government property.

Name - Mayank Saxena Case write up: Louis Vuitton Executive Summary Louis Vuitton’s (LV) major source of revenue was Fashion and leather goods which was 35% as compared to other products and 20% of this revenue came from Japan, undoubtedly a strong hold in the Japanese markets, with that being said, there are a lot many opportunities for LV to exploit in terms of new and emerging markets like China and India, which have a lot of untapped potential. They can expand their market segment by targeting the middle class and upper middle class bracket, and diversify their target audience i.e. women by introducing clothing for men and children. The key to deal with the current situation of LV would be to reduce dependency on Japanese markets and

Balfour Beatty also use appraisal. For example I found that once every year appraisals happen at Balfour Beatty these meetings happen between the employee and line manager. For Balfour Beatty Mick Byrne (2015) who is the project manager has his yearly appraisals with Dave Ronan (2015) his line manager they discuss the good and bad points of things which is good for the business. In the previous meeting between Mick Byrne (2015) and Dave Ronan (2015), Mick Byrne (2015) said “I discuss what my targets will be for the next year, and what I have done well, this is good because it provides me with job satisfaction” This is good because if they discuss their targets for next year it will be easier to achieve them as they will both know their goals.

By doing this, the company is either overstating inventory, and in so doing understating cost of goods sold, or overstating revenues, either of which is overstating net income. (An attempt to put p. 526 into my own words) 12-35 Misstatement Error or Fraud Control Substantive Procedure a. Error Create effective controls for counting inventory and supervise the counting of

Unfortunately to build the value chain we would need a more thorough investigation on the TJ’s processes and arrangements. In my opinion to make the proper investigation of the resources gaps and missed capabilities it is required to be very familiar with the company’s organizational aspects and business process. But due to the fact the company does not publish any investor reports and is has never gone public (Stock Exchange or Private equity funding). In my opinion the Porter’s tool such as Value chain analysis in this case has disadvantages comparing to Grant’s simple approach to resource management and strategic planning.