ipl-logo

Sunbeam Television Corporation V Mitzel Case Summary

1176 Words5 Pages

Sunbeam Television Corporation v. Marilyn A. Mitzel
Broadcast journalist Marilyn A. Mitzel won her court case against the Sunbeam Television Corporation and received a substantial amount of compensation, about $1 million in reparations (House 1). Mitzel believed the television station in which she worked, WSVN Fox 7 discriminated against her age when she was fired in 2005. Her career as a news anchor reporting for WSVN-TV began in 1988 and lasted for 17 years on a contract-basis (Sunbeam v. Mitzel). Every two or three years, her contracts would be renewed under the sole license of Sunbeam until February of 2005. The Sunbeam corporation had the power to program, future and present broadcasts as predetermined by the contracts. Mitzel filed her claim during 2006 under the violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act, which protects employees from age discrimination in the workplace (Sunbeam v. Mitzel). Alice Jacobs, Channel 7's Vice President of News and head of the corporation's day-to-day news operations controlled the format of news broadcasts. …show more content…

Mitzel). Since Mitzel was the primary reporter on this topic, her segments were reduced gradually until her broadcasts were removed from production. Jacobs did not have the final decision and sought approval from both Edward Ansin, the owner of the station and Robert Leider, Executive Vice President of Sunbeam and GM of the TV station who agreed with Jacobs' choice (Sunbeam v. Mitzel). The Sunbeam Television Corporation sought an appeal because Mitzel's claim was redefined as discrimination of age and sex within the workforce (House

Show More
Related

  • Wilson V Bauer Media Pty Ltd (Defendant)

    508 Words  | 3 Pages

    Wilson was given a non-monetary loss payout of $650,000 as part of the judgement, recognising the seriousness of the harm done to her image. In addition, Wilson was granted $3,917,472 in monetary damages for her financial loss in regard to missed roles and media. In total, Bauer Media was ordered to pay Wilson a total of $4,749,920.60 based on the aggregate of the two figures. Bauer Media appealed the judgement in April of 2018, and the following reevaluation of the sum a reduction of the damages was imposed on Wilson, with the amount being lowered to $600,000. While this was a substantial reduction from the previous judgement, it reflected the court's commitment to holding media organisations accountable for their reporting and the impact it can have on

    Read More

  • Freedom Of Act In Upton Sinclair's The Jungle

    278 Words  | 2 Pages

    This angered Marija even more, inducing her to tell her forelady’s boss. Hence she was consequently fired. The argument here is whether or not Marija had the right to speak out. The First Amendment gives her freedom of speech, but is it

    Read More

  • The Trial For The Murder Of Candy Kane

    2131 Words  | 9 Pages

    Hello Ladies and Gentlemen, and welcome back to CTV News at 9:00 PM. I am Lisa LaFlamme. Tonight we are looking at the trial that is causing interest all over the country. The trial for the murder of Candy Kane. Mine Mean is the accused and he is presumed to be the killer of Kane.

    Read More

  • Case Study: Coca-Cola Co. V. Koke Company

    287 Words  | 2 Pages

    Coca-Cola Co. v. Koke Co. of America, 254 U.S. 143 (1920) U.S. Sup. Ct. Facts: 1886 marked the invention of a caramel-colored soft drink created by John Pemberton. Coca-Cola got its name after two main ingredients, coca leaves and kola nuts. The Coca-Cola Company is suing Koke Company of America from using the word Koke on their products. They believe Koke Company of America is violating trademark infringement and is unfairly making and selling a beverage for which a trademark Coke has used.

    Read More

  • Michael Milkovich

    616 Words  | 3 Pages

    Michael Milkovich was a wrestling coach at a high school in Ohio. J. Theodore Diadiun, who worked for a newspaper owned by Loraine Journal Co., was sued by Milkovich for libel. Athletes that Milkovich coached got into a fight during a competition, which resulted in him having to testify under oath about the event a number of times in front of the Ohio High School Athletic Association. After one instance of Milkovich testifying, Diadiun wrote an article in which he said that Milkovich lied under oath. Milkovich first brought the suit to the Lake County Court of Common Pleas, which ruled that he did not prove that Diadiun acted with actual malice, which was then overturned by an Ohio appellate court and remanded back to the lower court.

    Read More

  • Lange V. Australian Broadcasting Corporation (Lange)

    122 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the case of Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (Lange), the High Court ruled that as the development of the common law in Australia cannot run counter to constitutional imperatives, the common law rules of qualified privilege should properly reflect the requirements of ss 7, 24, 64, 128 and related sections of the Australian Constitution. Freedom of speech is not absolute. This can be seen in the First Amendment of the United States Constitution whereby it has been held not to protect all speech like obscene publications or speech inciting imminent lawless action. Australian common law has long recognised limitations to free speech, for instance, those in relation to the criminal law of incitement and conspiracy, and in obscenity

    Read More

  • Edward Murrow: Moral Courage In My Connotation

    489 Words  | 2 Pages

    Moral Courage in my connotation, is the ability to act truthfully and wholly just in the midst of turmoil, as well as unpopular public opinion. I find Edward Murrow to be a prime example of moral courage. Edward Murrow was a reporter during the McCarthy era, as well as the host of the NBC show “See it now.” Edward Murrow took on a seemingly corrupt government in the name of justice as well as the preservation of the proletariat, despite the government being his own. Edward Murrow has shown plausible measures of moral courage from attacking McCarthy, as well as offering an airing of his rebuttal.

    Read More

  • Leah Remini: Scientology And The Aftermath

    311 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hollywood actress Leah Remini has dared the Church of Scientology to slap her with a lawsuit over the revelations in her A&E docu-series which the organization alleges are all lies. In a “Larry King Now” episode aired on Friday, the host asked Remini for her reaction on the church’s statement about A&E docu-series “Leah Remini: Scientology and the Aftermath” being nothing but a lie and a show for a profit. She then challenged the Church of Scientology to simply sue her over the matter, Entertainment Weekly relays. “Then they should sue us.

    Read More

  • The Herman Case

    1083 Words  | 5 Pages

    The social worker did not handle the case correctly or completely. Herman obviously had some social issues, and showed signs of psychological problems. No action was taken on account of those possible problems. No supervision or consultation was exercised in this case, even though the social worker did not know precisely what should have been done. Though the senior center director seemed to care more about her job than about Herman, she was simply following protocol that comes with her occupation.

    Read More

  • Media's Influence In The O. J. Simpson Case

    1033 Words  | 5 Pages

    Additionally, the media got into the investigation by asking questions about the events before the murder. The National Enquirer, for instance, took a different angle to investigate the case; however, by doing this, the media almost made it impossible for proper investigations to be held by the criminal justice system. Ogletree Jr. maintains that the press failed terribly by trying to assume what the lawyers or witnesses thought at different times of the trial, which was a fail (Ogletree). Consequently, there should be a level of protection from the media. Public figures should not have their cases aired or followed to prevent tampering of evidence or misconceptions.

    Read More

  • Mcdonald V. Chicago Case Study

    971 Words  | 4 Pages

    Why 2nd Amendment Is So Popular Background Information The second amendment is probably the most controversial amendment in the Bill of Rights. The second amendment is stated in the Bill of Rights as, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"(“Second Amendment”) This could mean that you have the right to possess a small gun for self-defence purposes only, but the real meaning is a very controversial argument. Focusing on this amendment is important because it is a very disputed amendment still debated today.

    Read More

  • Gallina V. Mintz Levin Case Summary

    470 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the case of Gallina v. Mintz Levin, Gallina male co-workers were made discriminatory comments after finding out that she had a young child (Walsh, 2013). Gallina spoke with others in the firm and partners in another office firm (Walsh, 2013). The partners that shared the offices with Gallina were upset to hear that she had seeked others thoughts and opinions on the matter at hand (Walsh, 2013). Gallina was eventually terminated based terminated based upon the evaluations that were negative from the partners in her office, even though the other partner outside firm had given her great evaluations (Walsh, 2013). Gallina falls under a protected class through the Title VII, Civil Rights Act.

    Read More

  • Sacramento City District Board Of Education V. Rachel Holland Case Summary

    793 Words  | 4 Pages

    Casetext (n.d.). Sacramento City Unified School District Board of Education v. Rachel H (786 F.Supp. 874). Retrieved from https://casetext.com/case/sacramento-city-school-dist-v-rachel-h. Due to this Rachel was placed into a second grade general education classroom with supplemental supports and services. So the judge ruled in favor of Rachel and the decision of the hearing officer was

    Read More

  • Racial Discrimination In Nursing

    1752 Words  | 8 Pages

    If a man were to do this to a woman, society would go further and beyond to make a point so why does this case make it no different. In another case, " Michael Silvka...sued ...when they announced that they do not hire men in the obstetric ward due to concerns for patient privacy, staffing, and quality of care"(Legal Eagle Eye Newsletter for the Nursing Profession). In result of this action, it can be evaluated that the hospital is breaking the 13th Amendment which explores that there should be no discrimination based on sexes. The unfairness of the situation is that there is no attention drawn to this issue. It grows an effect on anyone whether it be a man or woman who wants to be in

    Read More

More about Sunbeam Television Corporation V Mitzel Case Summary

Open Document