Intro: Intro: As a nurse we encounter many ethical and legal dilemmas on a daily basis. One of the ethical dilemmas presented to us was a 36 year old women scheduled for a salpingo – oophorectomy and hysterectomy. During conversation with the patient, the patient comments that she will not be going through menopause but elaborates that her friend had “surgical menopause” and it was devastating. Upon review of the chart, the nurse finds that the surgery consent was signed and calls the physician to relay the information. The physician instructs the nurse to move forward with pre-op. In this scenario a prudent nurse would inform the patient of all the risks and benefits involved and advocate for the patient based on the patient’s decision. Further notify MD that patient education is needed due to patient not fully understanding current procedure scheduled and surgery may need to be held.
Body 1: Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is the removal of both the fallopian tubes and the ovaries and hysterectomy is removal of the uterus. Once the procedure has concluded Mrs. Carson will go into surgical menopause. (Source 1, lewis volume 2 pg 1299) Surgical menopause differs from regular menopause because surgical menopause is immediate, estrogen is no longer available, and the patient will not have her menses. Surgical menopause can be more severe related to
…show more content…
The legal ethical theory comes into play “teleology- used a less desirable method to reach a positive wanted goal.” Though the patient needs this procedure for betterment of her health and it is prescriber desired. The patient going into the surgery not fully informed will lead to serious repercussions. teleology (source 4, pg 567 leadership
Many women of reproductive age with early-stage cancer come to us for a procedure that we now perform routinely, called fertility-preserving radical trachelectomy. Case study 3 Grace is 76 years. Her husband of 48 years has recently passed away. She is still missing him. Her children live abroad.
Furthermore, the women’s consent forms were signed under stressful conditions, some not even being informed of what was being signed, so actual consent could not be given. However, the judge’s ruling favored the county hospital, stating there was no way the doctors would have known the women
According to the oncologist, Nurse L. was acting immorally and unprofessional when informing her patient Michael Q. of all his treatment options including chemotherapy, and alternative treatments such as natural therapies. I strongly disagree that the nurse was acting immoral because it was the patient’s medical and legal right to know all of his options, not just the ones that may be most successful, or ones that medical professional determines as the best options. That being said, I do not believe the patient’s physician should have the final decision about their treatment, unless the patient is unable to make a final decision for himself and has no family to assist him. Because the oncologist did not tell his patient about all the treatment options, Michael Q. was not was not fully informed and therefore his agreement to receive the chemotherapy treatment was not informed consent.
She was not aware of that consequence and would not have proceeded with the treatment had she had known. Another ethical issue that was brought to my attention was the detail that the sample of Henrietta’s tumor was unknowingly taken and sent to a lab. The two ethical issues contradict with informed consent standards. For informed consent to be valid it must be, knowingly, voluntarily and competently give. In the first issue, it was standard at Hopkins for individuals to be told about fertilely loss, but that was not the case for Henrietta.
Midterm Essay Exam Nurses experience moral distress in situations such as Amelia Wilkerson's. In cases similar to this, nurses are sometimes left feeling powerless to take action on the appropriate decision. Rathert, May, and Chung (2016) explain that ethical dilemmas and conflicts are unavoidable in healthcare today. The ethical dilemma for Amelia comes after responding to Katy Palmer's question.
Before he even begins his argument, he provides a strong reliable background by being a professor of bioethics which studies the ethics of medical and biological research. This gives him a much more trustworthy statement because it shows us readers that he knows what he is talking about and it backs up his arguments since many are emotionally based. First, since he is knowledgeable of this topic, he describes the procedures being done with more detail by stating that, “the uterus removal was intended to spare her discomfort of menstrual cramps; the surgery to prevent the development of breasts aimed to make her more comfortable when she is laying down or had a strap across her chest in her wheelchair” (Singer 23). By explaining all of this he is providing an even more stable and credible background because it shows he is educated on the topic, since he explains what he is articulating about. He starts off his assessment using a claim of fact stating, “five years ago, the parents of a profoundly intellectually disabled girl...known only as Ashley, told the world about a controversial treatment they were using on their child” (Singer 22).
There is a controversial issue in regards to the violation of the HIPAA privacy rule concerning a client who was received at a small town hospital emergency rule. As a privacy officer, this issue has been bought to my attention. HIPPA violations are serious offenses, and ultimately, it is my responsibility to take corrective actions to resolve this matter upon this investigation. HIPAA’s purpose, Is to protect the privacy of health information concerning a client or an employee.
Evans and the Ohio Department of Corrections failed Tomcik in applying basic ethical theories. Normative and applied ethics were not followed because the minimal standard of care in this case called for palpitation of the breasts, which was not done. If the physician knew that palpitation of the side of Tomcik’s breasts was the correct minimal procedure to detect cancer and he did not complete it, he failed to apply the theory of how he should behave. Deontological ethics were failed as the doctor was duty-bound to “do no harm or injustice”. (Greek Medicine, 2012)
Through the bioethics program at Columbia University, I intend to further investigate a few areas of interest. Surgical ethics is a significant area of interest and holds importance to me. I am interested in investigating the ethics of conducting research on the decisional capacity of patients who have
In this case study the primary nurse, Amelia Wilkerson, is caring for a patient, Katy Palmer who has recently been admitted to the hospital for fatigue and abnormal lab counts. The patient asks Amelia for information regarding her diagnosis. Amelia has seen Katy’s results and knows that she has been diagnosed with acute myelogenous leukemia. The ethical dilemma seen in this situation is that it is outside of the scope of practice for Amelia to discuss Katy’s original diagnosis with her.
Menopause is a natural biological change in women’s reproductive system that leads to a cessation of menstruation. It usually occurs between ages 45 and 55 when a woman reaches midlife, but can be induced earlier if a woman had a reproductive surgery. Although, menopause is a natural process ,in recent decades, it has been viewed as an “unpleasant marker of old age that requires medical attention”(Rebecca) or worse “disease” that needs to be immediately treated. This radical notion that menopause should be medicalized can be attributed to cultural and socio-economic factors in the United States. The patriarchal society has a long history of subjugating women and establishing gender hierarchy to lower women’s self-governance and maintain its
All in all this is a tough decision, especially for the nurses because they are faced with ethical dilemmas on a daily basis and it’s hard to make the right decision while trying to advocate for the patient at the same time. (Poikkeus
Because hormones and genetic factors can cause gynecomastia, the plastic surgeon may need to refer a patient to an endocrinologist for either (1) blood and urine studies that would show elevated hormone levels or (2) genetic studies that would show the count and other details of the patient’s chromosomes. An abnormal testicular exam will prompt the surgeon to order an ultrasound of the testes. The surgeon may wish to obtain a mammogram to rule out a breast tumor, which, though unlikely, can occur in men especially with asymmetric breast
Nurses around the world have struggled with ethical challenges in patient care, especially here in the Virgin Islands. We face an ethical dilemma in the healthcare field every day. During my freshman year in nursing school, I was taught about Florence Nightingales. Her greatest achievement was to transform nursing into a respectable profession for women (Florence-nightingale.co.uk, 2018). She reflected ethical duties of confidentiality, communication, and the importance of meeting patients ' needs.
Cancer surgeons thought, falsely, that each time the surgery was radicalized even more, the more successful it would be. “Pumped up with self confidence, bristling with conceit, and hypnotised by the potency of medicine, oncologists pushed their patients and their discipline to the brink of disaster” (Mukherjee 223). Today less invasive surgeries are performed with the better results and less