“The world has enough for everyone 's need, but not enough for everyone 's greed.”
Mahatma Gandhi Human like all the other species can be called as a child of mother earth but the moment he developed his powers using mother earth for more than the basic needs he became a plunderer but human say we are doing this for growth, for development and for sustainability. But time shows a different scenario and shocking equation. The equation says that our earth is 4.6 billion years old, scaling it to 46 years human has been here for 4 hours in these four hours man evolved and grew step by step and industrial revolution began just 1 minute ago and in that time we’ve destroyed more than 50 percent of the world’s forests. Can this be called sustainable
…show more content…
We, human beings are selfish, all the where we are today is because of our unending needs, we think that we need to cut trees, extract minerals, generate electricity, collect data, etc. for a better future for ourselves but are we actually going to live forever or we are gone busy utilizing these in manufacturing computers, and other gadgets where technology has started overpowering us. We are also cutting our jobs and replacing those with automatic machines. We have been plundering our planet to the limit, to boost machines’ to work and last long. We are collecting data to teach A.I., A.I. is fed on knowledge of the planet.
We look around today, only to realise how dependent we are on the technology Humans created and are using A.I. to make life easy but A.I. is making its own future easy by using us.
A.I. is being more efficient and more intelligent, it might just turn to be the fittest and as Charles Darwin said and accordingly survive better than humans.
To conclude I only want to say that excessive use of anything can move towards the destruction of us. It doesn’t matter what we are using, it could be our creator Mother Nature or our own creation A.I.
Nature teaches us to balance we should learn it timely, either way, nature itself will
Will we continue to let our own intelligence be flattened by the artificial intelligence we surround ourselves
We cannot let technology get this far. We are the ones who can control this and make sure it does not
For centuries, our world has developed from agricultural age into a technological era. Nowadays, we are surrounded by all kinds of electrical equipment to serve our work and life with much higher efficiency. There are tons of innovations and new technologies that have been developed recently: Internet, robots, social apps and new treating methods. Those technologies are developing really fast at a speed we could never image before. However, as time goes by, it also brings people concerns, is those technologies going to bring any threat to our daily life?
Compare and Contrast Essay There Will Come Soft Rains and Harrison Bergeron, by Kurt Vonnegut and Ray Bradbury,are both very famous stories written in the science fiction/Dystopian genre. Due to both their eerie foreshadowing for the future, both have a feeling of apprehension over the reader. Even though the both stories have different messages, there are important similarities between how they are shown, and how they relate to everything. With the authors using the settings that they did, it played a key role in setting the tone.
How does federalism work to prevent tyranny? The United States was established on flaws and chaos that make it mature rapidly. Just leaving the motherland of Great Britain like a rebellious teenager looking to start a life on its own. The United States stumble on the Articles of Confederations but had to pick themselves up quickly. Not only did the United States create a nation they established the guidelines for the world.
With how advanced today's technology and A.I has become,
The Media and The Manufacture of Deviance 800 words, Assessment Weighting 30% Briefly define the concept of ‘moral panic’ Cohen argues the concept of moral panic is a person or group that becomes defined as a threat to society to a person’s social value and their interests. Moral panic is fear that comes from a group or issue that causes panic within society, but it’s believed this fear and reaction is exaggerated and this is felt and reacted to by the public forms of media such as newspapers, articles and live news etc; knife crime and islamophobia. “Implicit in the use of two words moral panic is the suggestion that the threat is to something held sacred by or fundamental to the society” (Thompson, Kenneth 1998) Cohens definition of moral panic is an over exaggerated reaction by groups
This, as a result, will certainly cause humanity as a whole to lose their own instinct of independency and self-control. What will be left of society will most unfortunately be unbalanced, inefficient, and appalling. As a result, society should come to the conclusion that technology isn’t disastrous itself alone, it is the connection and reliance that we have with it that makes it disastrous. Before we come face to face with terrible and unexplainable situations, it is wise for us as a society to reach a decision to overcome this dependency and be able to function properly once again to continue to live a prosperous and fulfilling
— Bill Gates Bottom Line Artificial intelligence was once a sci-fi movie plot but it is now happening in real life. Humans will need to find a way to adapt to these breakthrough technologies just as we have done in the past with other technological advancement. The workforce will be affected in ways difficult to imagine as for the first time in our history a machine will be able to think and in many cases much more precisely than
A world of robots working in factories, markets, schools, companies, and limited amount of work space for humans that’s what is going on. The things we saw in movies and what we were dreaming is all becoming reality. Recently, technology has been improving in a very rapid pace. Technology, such as smart phones, tablets, and television, made our lives easier and more convenient. Now people can click a button and deliver food or items they want anywhere.
"We are not in business to make maximum profit for our shareholders. We are in business...to serve society. Profit is our reward for doing it well. If business does not serve society, society will not long tolerate our profits or even our existence." Kenneth Dayton, former Chairman of the Dayton-Hudson Corporation 1.
The earth, our earth, once used to be a healthy environment, with no pollution or destruction. Not until humans began creating advanced technology and other inventions that started to affect the way we live. As humans we thought these inventions would just make life easier for us and we don’t mean to harm the planet. We are all trying to help the planet but at the same time, destroying it.
We have grown to see our parents have children, build houses, buy cars cultivate farmlands, explore timber and many other aspects. I think that this is the time to ask ourselves the question how good or bad are our actions to the environment? We should not inherit the habits of our forefathers because we are now responsible for the consequences of our action base on consequential ethics which states that it is common for us to determine our moral responsibility by weighing the consequences of our actions. According to consequentialism, correct moral conduct is determined solely by a cost-benefit analysis of an action's consequences. And in this case, if we apply sustainable development and consequential ethics, I am sure that we will protect our environment looking at it as a social
They imply that life would be hard to live with the lack of new technologies, however, it becomes ironic because life is already at risk due to technology. Making technological advances and preserving the environment and human health will not be possible because of the pollution resulting of the waste output, the depletion of natural resources and the global warming resulting of the emission of carbon dioxide. To begin with, the waste output of the new technologies pollutes the lands, the water and the air of the earth. An average computer screen contains up to 8 pounds of lead and 2 to 5 percent of the trash in American landfills belong to electronics waste.