Sustainable innovation exploring a new paradigm is a paper that has been written by Dorothea Seebode (now Dorothea Ernst). She holds a PhD in Physics and she has worked at the Philips Lighting department for 10 years. Most of the time she worked as project manager in R&D, internal consulting and technology management. After this she has been the senior director Sustainability at Philips Research from April 2006 till July 2011. Here her job was “embedding sustainability as a business and innovation driver”(Philips article). She represented Philips at the WBCSD Vision 2050 project and besides this she is a LEAD Fellow and a board member of the Green Economy Coalition. This Paper has been published in June 2011, so it was published at the end …show more content…
The first two parts are about the theory of sustainable innovation, based on the WBCSD Vision 2050 the last two parts are about how this is integrated into the four strategies of Philips. Its goal is to integrate the long term ideas into concrete actions or as it is said in the paper:” this paper offers a tool to link Philips’ innovation and sustainability agendas” (Paper). To do so the paper is addressed to Philips and its partners, but it can also be used by innovators who want to take steps towards the WBCSD vision 2050.
The paper
The World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) Vision 2050 is a report made by an eighteen month long effort of 29 leading companies from 14 industries. It describes a desired future sketched around three questions: What does a sustainable world look like? How can we realize it? What are the roles business can play in ensuring more rapid progress toward that world?
Then it describes a pathway of steps based on 9 different tracks that need to be taken to get there. It gives companies a description of the long-term vision and a possible pathway to get there.
The paper + Vision 2050 the new agenda for business in brief +
…show more content…
It states that we overuse “earth’s services” and that it gets worse every year. This is made painfully clear during the earth overshoot day. This is the day that we used more resources that year than the planet can provide. This is in line with A safe operating space for humanity by Johan RockstrÖm. He states that we are overstepping earth’s boundaries, because of the growing reliance on fossil fuel. Out of the 9 categories, we are overstepping 3 of them: the biodiversity loss, nitrogen cycle and climate change.
In Baker’s Sustainable Development it is said that we need to acknowledge the limits to growth, because “ecological processes underpin the rest of human activity, and, if these are impaired, then a condition for the very possibility of human activity is impaired too”(Dobson 1998: 44) (baker p21)
All of this while there are people who cannot even meet their basic needs. Baker (2006) argues that, according to the Brundtland concept of sustainable development, we need to make a link between the needs of the poor and the wants of the rich, because the poor cannot meet their fundamental needs and the rich consume too much. That the rich consume too much can be due to the cause that the rich think that increased consumption equals increased development and wealth. (Baker p20)
Radical change is needed to reach the WBCSD Vision 2050, the needs of the poor should be fulfilled and wants of the rich need to be
This day and age, change has become the new norm that shapes and develops the business world and global economy. A rising topic that has shepherd the direction of innovation is climate change and environmental awareness. The sustainability of a company encompasses their ability to manage social and environmental risks, obligations and opportunities. This concept is important for managers and to understand and implement because of government regulations and potential cost efficiency. In Oregon, there are numerous companies that express the importance of being sustainable.
The greenhouse effect is vital to the survival of life and humans on earth. Although, too much of it can affect our lives in a harmful way, just as too much of anything can harm or even kill us. In comparison to the book, Of Mice and Men, Lennie’s marvel over soft things such as bunnies, hair, and red dresses usually were taken too far. This led to major consequences throughout the book. The greenhouse effect is not just beneficial, it is imperative to all life that it warms the earth enough to prevent a global ice age.
By talking about actions (or organisms) like invasive species, climate change, CO2 emissions, and habitat fragmentation, Kolbert argues that these heavily human driven deeds are causing a negative impact on the species around us. Due to these occurrences and many more, humans have put the Earth in a dangerous position. Thankfully, there are actions that can be taken to save our planet, but we need to get started now. These actions lead up to very extreme, which includes tampering with our atmosphere or even building new civilizations on other planets or the moon. However crazy these actions may seem, it's unreal to think that us humans have caused the problem that is leading to these drastic
Unlike humans trying to reconnect back to nature, we rather seem to want to create an artificial nature in our cage of industrious lives. Regrettably, this author 's call to save the environment has not been fully applied, as of today humans are still releasing toxins into the environment at the highest rate in history, occupying forests with building in the name of owning something, in places such as Antarctica, the polar bears are starving, even worst humans had it illegal to feed them while they are exploding and destroying their homes, the seas-fishes are iced up, just to name a few reasons why connecting back to nature is critical. Although green activists such as Ecosia have been working on restoring the environment, however, more needs to be done. We must see to it that nature bounces back to its full
Economists believe that the hardships many poor people face like homelessness or slums are a result of a wealth gap that has been exponentially diverging the rich from the poor since the seventies. Studies show that “over forty
“The Working Poor: Invisible in America”, written by David Shipler (2004), portrayed many families who faced extreme barriers that directly impacted their families and affected the quality of their lives. This book not only gave the reader a sense of America’s social justice issues, but it also allowed the reader an opportunity to take a look inside the lives of real people struggling with social, economic, and cultural barriers to achieving the “American Dream”. Among many of the individuals and families in the book, most were barely making it financially, despite large efforts. With respect to social work, David Shipler did a fantastic job opening the eyes of the reader to the problems one might face with clients, and the spiral effects
Humans have impacted the global environment significantly. Human populations have rapidly increased for the past few centuries. Imagine a world where sustenance is rare but people are plenty. Imagine the world where everyone's shoulders are touching one another and there is no room to move. “A Modest Proposal” by Jonathan Swift is an extremely sarcastic solution to a problem plaguing Ireland in the 1720s overpopulation.
Imagine being so hungry you can’t even move. Having to sleep in a house made of dirt, or being so thirsty because there is no safe drinking water. People around the World face these problems everyday. 328,000,000 children live in extreme poverty, and 1 in 10 people live on less than $1.90 a day. The conditions they live in are horrible and everyone should do what they can to help end poverty and world hunger.
These explanations are persuasive in their own right, but ecologists have increased some additional to deal with, like what would be the resultant of alteration of biodiversity on ecosystem properties, such as productivity, carbon storage, hydrology, and nutrient cycling? The apparent follow-up problem is what are the resultant of resemble largely anthropogenic alteration in biodiversity on the goods and services that ecosystems give to humans? If altered biodiversity affects ecosystem lot, is there a point at which changes in the lot might have a negative influence in human welfare? That is, those problems that being answered step by step by our own biodiversity, climate change, ozone layer begins to release the air or gas, and
Since 1990, the world has reduced the number of people who live in extreme poverty by over half. But that still leaves 767 million people living on the edge of survival with less than $1.90 a day.2 The numbers of world hunger has gone down by a lot, but yet world hunger is still going on. Some of the poorest countries in the world have few to no jobs, and the few jobs that there are, are paid very little each day. Survival is key to these people and with the little money they have, it’s hard to do that. Across the globe, conflicts consistently disrupt farming and food production.
One of the problems playing a great role in this confusing web is poverty. According to the Oxford Dictionary, the definition of poverty is “the state of being extremely poor”. Now many people might think, “So what? Why should I care?”. Well one thing is for sure; we, people, should care.
Particularly, the reports focus was placed on consumer electronics and related component manufacture. The main value adding processes for these product streams were determined to be firstly, innovation through research and development through investment in SAIT and R&D centres worldwide. Secondly, customer service which is enhanced by providing multi-platform service options and consumer focused development through feedback facilities. Finally, that value added to consumers by sustainability measures, including recyclable packaging, a green supply chain and bio-product
Relationships between lifecycle, innovation and sustainability are crucial parts of sustainable design. These three aspects all link
Never the less, it’s ironic how in the 21st century we prize ourself for being progressive when almost half of us - over 3 billion people - can’t even conjure up what life is like beyond ‘the poverty trap’ they are in. We prize ourselves, when one out of every two children is poor. Can you imagine growing up as one of the 640 million kids whom have no adequate shelter, let alone a place to call home? Or the 400 million to whom safe drinking water is simply a figment of their imagination? Or maybe the 270 million who have no means of getting health care?
Sustainable development, as its name suggests, is a concept continually elaborating. The most commonly used definition, according to World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED), is the development which “meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” (WCED, 1987). It shows the importance of considering benefits for both current and future generations and strongly supports economic development, while it also implies when accessing environment and natural resources, human beings tend to take an anthropocentric view, that the primary goal is to satisfy human needs. With no regard for earth as a life-support system, a development will not be considered sustainable. Therefore, by taking economic, social, environmental issues into accounts is a key approach to develop sustainably in different contexts.