Background 1. HMAS Sydney sank on 19 November 1941, after engagement with HSK Kormoran, a disguised German raider as a Dutch merchant vessel off the coast of Western Australia (Bathgate, 2007). All 645 members of her crew were lost whilst the Kormoran lost 81 members of its 399 crew (Royal Australian Navy, n.d.). The lack of clarity of the events surrounding the engagement has resulted in conspiracy and controversy towards the actions of Sydney, with the addition of the unknown location of both vessels until 2008. Sydney is the greatest maritime disaster in Australian history. (Affairs, 1999) Aim 2. To investigate the actions of the Sydney and Kormoran towards each other and how they effected the overall outcome. The analysis of the strategic …show more content…
From the accounts of the crew of the Kormoran and the damage of the wreck of Kormoran which was found in 2008, it is clear that the crew continued to fight even after communication was lost with the bridge. The crew of Sydney was highly trained, being praised for actions in battle especially in the sinking if the Italian destroyer Espero (Royal Australian Navy, n.d.). Thus, Sydney would have been able to bring themselves to action stations for each individual department without the usual reliance on the executive branch. For the damage that was inflicted on the Kormoran to cause her to sink would be only possible if continued to fight even with critical damage and beginning to sink. Throughout a battle Sydney's crew had three main objectives; fighting the enemy ship, coping with floods and fighting fires. The training the crew had practised before would have meant that would have worked frantically on these 3 objectives rather than self preservation. Even though these actions resulted in Sydney's crew to unable abandon ship as there was no direct order to evacuate and resilience of Sydney would have trapped a majority of the crew inside the hull. It is miraculous that the crew of Sydney was able to continue fighting for long and inflict the amount of damage on the Kormoran even with a surprise attack, proving the resilience of its crew. (Lewis,
Australia and allies lost 900 people, 77 aircraft and a load of ships. Facilities were destroyed and the Japanese lost around 131 planes during the attacks. Australians were terrified that the Japanese would invade or attack more areas. You could feel the uneasiness of
The legend is rewarded to a soldier who showed courage, pride and endurance towards Australia. The Japanese escaped on little row boats and flew as their lives were at stake. With the Australians come to cross the Kumasi River, the battle of the Kokoda track had come to an end for good. Only 10% of the Japanese troops of
The 39th Battalion was made up of mostly 18 and 19 year old boys. They were hardly trained, unequipped and outnumbered in men. The Australians realised that they couldn’t win this battle, so they returned back to the Kokoda Village while still being cautious of Japanese troops and defending their selves. Late August was when the Australians had back up forces, but even though they had reinforcement, the Australians and Papuan’s were forced to retreat back to Imita Ridge which is just 50 km’s away from Port
These events solidified the resolve of the Australian military, never to fight a battle on its own shores a policy that is still maintained, further the battle of Kokoda was one of the first occasions where Australia and American forces combined in a military alliance with this alliance strengthen from this point onward with Americas now being a major partner in the defence in the
Impacts in, and on Australia were felt almost instantly, and can still be noted in today's modern society where the relationships between Australia and the United Kingdom, and Australia and America are fortified internationally. Prior to World War Two, Australia was apart of the British commonwealth, and still is today, but during the war, Australia was at great risk because of it's geographical location. Many felt that support from the British was scarce, and as the Japanese continued fighting in the Pacific, the risk of attack on Australia was imminent. This was shown by the infamous bombing of Darwin on the 19th of February 1942. Source 1 shows a map of Japanese occupied areas in the Pacific at it's peak.
This was so important for the Pacific war as it marked the first time that the Japanese had been stopped in their advance across the pacific and stopped the Japanese from capturing Port Moresby. If the Japanese were able to successfully capture Port Moresby, then it would have put Australia at risk as the Japanese could have then invaded or attacked Australia. The Kokoda campaign is also significant for its use of military tactics that As significant as the Kokoda campaign was for the Pacific War, there was also many other campaigns and battles that were also extremely significant such as the Battle of the Coral Sea, the Siege of Tobruk, the Battle of Milne Bay, the Battle of the Bismarck Sea, and the Battle of Guadalcanal all of which were only a few of the many important battles that helped the success and safety of Australia and were vital to the allies attempt to overtake the axis powers. While, these battles the Australians were involved with were extremely helpful and vital to the Australians success in the war but the Kokoda campaign was significant in its own way for its use of military tactics such as jungle warfare and fire and movement where one of the group makes their way toward the enemy while another fires, to keep the enemy distracted and it saved Australia from being
According to Jack Mulholland who was 20 and a Australian veteran in the war the bombing of Darwin was a battle they weren 't prepared for, no one knew how to use any weapons and didn 't have any proper training. Jack Mulholland believes the bombing of Darwin has never been acknowledged for what it was. The Japanese perspective of Kaname Harada a Japanese pilot that provided air cover for the bombing pilots he had thought that Australian soldiers would be waiting at the port ready for battle, but to his surprise no one was there, they went on with the battle
Kokoda was a brutal and deadly battle between Australia and Japan during WWII. This battle was a major turning point in Australian history and helped to develop Australia as a country. The Kokoda campaign of World War II, caused by conflict and cooperation, has shaped the Australian identity that is still evident today in the 21st century. This essay will discuss how conflict and cooperation caused the Kokoda campaign, what it was, and the long-term and short-term implications of the Kokoda campaign.
The Kokoda Trail was a critical supply line which ran over the Owen Stanley Range and straight to the capital city of Port Moresby. Control of this on Japan’s behalf gave them a huge advantage in obtaining supplies (Alex. D, 2014). On July 21st-22nd 1942 Japan had arranged to land their troops on the northern coast of New Guinea so they could advance to Port Moresby along the Kokoda Trail (source 2). On September 24th 1924 the Japanese began a slow withdrawal and headed back down the trail towards the northern beaches. Their withdrawal was followed by an Australian advancement (Kokoda Campaign Key Dates, 2014).
Although there were a number of Australian casualties, in relation to the Viet-Cong troops, Australia had a lot less. “There were 18 Australians killed - 17 from D Company and one from the 1st Armoured Personnel Carrier Squadron - and 21 wounded.” As seen through source B, the efforts of the Australian troops are reflective of the number of casualties, in relation to the number they were fighting against, being up to two thousand, five hundred
To what extent was the Battle for Kokoda a Disaster? To a small extent the Battle of Kokoda was a disaster. While there were some disastrous aspects of the campaign, the overall success of the campaign shows that it was not a disaster, but a victory. During the first part of the campaign, admittedly, the Australians made some mistakes, but some mistakes don’t equal a disaster, especially once the odds turned in their favour in the second part of their campaign.
Not only the war had a massive effect on the Indigenous in Australia, The war was a huge boom to the Australian economy and as it turned out another massive factor. As many Australian fundamental products were purchased as could be produced, and secondary, subsidiary industries manufactured many ‘modern’ items for the services. Many men and women retired and fled their careers to accompany the armed forces leading to a ‘deficit’ of labour. New commerce and businesses need to have been created to fund the troops with combat weapons, uniforms and ammunition. Scarce goods needed to be controlled by the Australian Government in enhancing better buying and selling and in ensuring that everyone received a fair share.
However, even with this in mind, the battle was a significant one, for both good and bad reasons, and this cannot be denied. Through the sheer number of soldiers lost, all the way to the depiction of the Australian spirit in preserving the memories of these men, it is clear that the battle served a purpose, in the
On June 15th, The Board of Trade investigated on the ships sinking concluding that the ship was unarmed by German forces during
Australia’s experiences of World War II were significant for Australia and impacted on the shaping of our national identity. Australia 's response to entry into World War II in 1939 differed from Australia 's entry into World War I in 1914. Reasons for this includes attitudes towards war changing after gaining the knowledge and experiencing consequences of World War I, the conditions and lead up to World War II as well as Australia’s strong support for Britain. Firstly, the attitude of Australians changed due to World War 3I proving that war was not glamourous or exciting like it was assumed. During the lead up to World War II Australians had already struggled to survive through the depression and were now required to survive at war.