Comparing Aristotle And Plato's Three Types Of Rhetoric

In this chapter I have understood that it is basically about rhetoric “Public speaker”. Aristotle and Plato had different views and yet different philosophies. Aristotle was basically concerned with the logics. For Aristotle rhetoric is basically concerned with persuasion. The speaker needs to convince the public that whatever he is delivering is right. Basically the theory has two main guidelines. The speaker must consider their audience and deliver speeches while recognizing the public. The speech should be prepared considering ethos, way the speaker’s character is discovered through his speech logos, logics, evidence used and pathos, the feelings or emotions of the public as outcome. Through these proofs the speech can be effective. Syllogism

Epideictic speeches mostly focus on the social issues which are delivered in the public places to blame honor or praise someone and by deliberative it means that the response or reaction of the public in relation to the speech delivered. Will they act or think positive or negative. Dramatism is considered as a new rhetoric. This theory has been proposed by Burkes who had some beliefs for the dramatism theory according to which human beings are animal (social) in nature and thus uses symbols to satisfy themselves. Then he believes that language and symbols are an important part of human existence as it is difficult to express your message without the use of language and if the language does not contain motivational symbols the speakers will also be deprived of that motive. Language has its own importance because what we observe and examine is provided to us by the language. But then he finally states that human beings are free to make choices of their own which is the core of chapter. The term drama means performance by the human beings who are the actors on the stage which is the