Tourism Vs Inbound Tourism

Generally, it accepted that tourism in a natural setting is most closely attuned to the leisure and recreation paradigm, with tourism being regarded as an extreme form of recreation (Leiper 1979; Mathieson and Wall 1982; Murphy 1986). Therefore, it follows that at some point or series of points along a continuum, recreation ceases and tourism start. A number of precise definitions of tourism have been developed that have fixed this transition point to satisfy disciplinary interests (Morley 1990). To a large extent these definitions serve their purposes well (Ross 1994). From an individual’s perspective, however, tourism cannot be defined easily in absolute terms; like the other components of leisure, tourism is an abstract construct that is

This is the same assumption used by Blake and Gillham (2001). Outbound tourism demanded by households is a function of disposable incomes. Inbound tourism demanded by foreigners is a function of tourism prices and exchange rates (Wattanakuljarus, 2006). Moreover, attitudes also relate to social behavior. People who are perceived to share similar attitudes will also be perceived to exhibit similar social behaviors, while those people who are felt to hold different attitudes may be perceived to be in conflict with the observer. Attitudes to natural area tourism activities, in turn, are either influenced by or reflected in two factors. The first of these is the symbolic meaning of the activity undertaken by the individual, while the second relates to the value-based meanings that the words “tourism” and “tourist” elicit among user groups. Colton (1987) argues that the tourism, leisure, and recreation are basically emotive activities that can be analyzed by the perspective of symbolic interactionism. Symbolic interactionism is based on the premise that human society is characterized by the use of symbols and meanings that are derived through the interaction process.

Tourism consumption usually leads to increased output, prices and wages in the industries that sell products directly to tourists. Therefore, poor households are likely to be negatively affected via the price channel; rising price will reduce the real income effect. The largest increases in prices that result are, in general, for the types of goods and services that tourists consume. These are products that domestic residents only usually consume if they take a trip (accommodation, passenger transport, tour agency and operation services, recreational services, and souvenir goods), if they go to restaurants or if they buy food products. Most products are those purchased more by higher income households; the direct effect of the channel will lead to small increases in prices paid by poor households, through food products. Even in this case, tourists tend to buy a different set of food from those consumed by poor Households (Laffargue,