Expository Essay #2 Question
The Synar Amendment With the aim of reducing the number of tobacco-related premature deaths per year, numerous laws restricting the underage access to tobacco products were enacted by the United States government in the 1990s. The most significant one was the Synar Amendment, which was adopted in June 1992 and afterwards changed the basis of anti-tobacco regulations at both the state and local level. In this essay, I will provide a clear definition of the term as well as state the reasons for choosing it as a source for my research paper. To begin with, the Synar Amendment has been passed in a congress of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), which is under the supervision from the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) in 1992. The law, which was named after its sponsor (Mike Synar), was a contingent prohibition on the sale of tobacco to minors. According to that, minors who are under a certain age determined by each state’s laws cannot purchase cigarettes and other related products legally, otherwise the violators will be harshly
…show more content…
Firstly, the Synar Amendment is a representative example of the federal anti-tobacco regulations, on which I focus in the proposal essay. Such amendment is an efficient method of the authorities in the attempt to restrict the use of tobacco, with the juvenile being the aspects in particular. Secondly, the term is a typical concept in America, which is unfamiliar to many countries in the world. Because of this, there are plenty of rooms for discussing the difference between the implementation and enforcement of tobacco control laws of the United States and those of other countries in my research paper. To sum up, I firmly believe the concept of “The Synar Amendment” will develop my argument
In his article, “Addicted to Health” Robert H. Bork has written about an ideal that is told through an informative argument on how government efforts are betraying what the founding fathers have built this great nation upon. The idea of freedom. Bork claims that many recent altercations with tobacco companies betray an ultimate ambition to control American lives. He implies many facts that include percentages about the smokers of American society and explains how the government relies on tobacco companies, to help cover up the funds that have been lost throughout the years. He also relates the issue to alcoholic beverages and the era of prohibition.
@listen, [above] Abraham Lincoln and the Corwin Amendment (13th). I did check it out at; Abraham Lincoln and the Corwin Amendment www.lib.niu.edu/2006/ih060934.html The part of the article you leave out is very interesting. One resolution�not included in Lincoln 's proposals�offered that "no amendment shall be made to the Constitution, which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish, or interfere within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State."
John is a young 17 year old young man that lives in the poor side of chicago, this man killed a man when he was walking home from school because he was being robbed. The second man is Dawson he is a 19 year old man who is wealthy and lives in a nice house in beverly hills. This man killed his best friend because he was drunk and thought his friend was a burglar who was robin his house. Both of these men committed similar crimes who do you think is going to be let off easy and who was sentenced to life in prison or the harsher consequences?
Two hundred and two years, seven months, and twelve days is what it took our twenty-seventh amendment to be ratified onto our constitution. Was this a very sensitive and complex amendment that needed meticulous studying and logistics planing? No, the twenty-seventh amendment simply states that no Senators or Representatives can alter their pay during their tenure and only can it be changed when their term is up. In the constitution it states "No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of Representatives shall have intervened". While this seems so simple, there seems to be some inherent complexity to it.
Constitution was created to lay the foundation of laws in the newly formed United States of America in 1787. Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Thomas Paine, and John Adams all wrote the Constitution with one common goal of all men receiving right to the natural freedoms of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” These were all rights that could not be infringed upon; they were the core principles of a nation that arose above previous colonial oppressions. The framers, when creating the Constitution, had to make sure that every individual voice was being heard and that laws were made in a fair, orderly manner. Today, the Constitution continues to be the overarching law of the United States, and even its framers might not necessarily agree with some of its modern-day interpretations.
Amendment 2 “Gunman eyed other venue” Wisconsin State Journal Friday October, 6 2017 Section A Page 1 and 5 Summary of News Article This news article is all about the Las Vegas shooting and about the person who did it. What happened in Las Vegas was extremely sad and devastating.
Women have always wanted equal rights and fought to gain equality. On August 1920 the 19th amendment was ratified into the Constitution. The 19th amendment stated that no one will be denied the right to vote based on your sex. This changed everything for the women in the US. Women everywhere started to work more and started to rely less on men.
Since the birth of America, white men have oppressed women and minorities. The prolonged and vexatious process of equal rights is still evident in today 's society; however, the advancement in the past one hundred years has fabricated a bridge over the gushing ravine between the rights of men and women. The largest platform that deposited a foundation for women 's suffrage was the ratification of the nineteenth amendment in 1920. It was then that everything changed for not only women but all minorities. The nineteenth amendment served as an accolade for the aspirations that initiated new waterways and connections of independence, revolution, and value before and after the ratification.
The United States is a nation of immigrants. In both colossal and small ways, immigrants have contributed to American culture, to its economic and physical growth, political power, and reputation of freedom and opportunity to the world. However, debates about illegal immigration have become more heated and contentious as some have argued that the 14th amendment should only grant citizenship to those children who have at least one legal immigrant parent. I, on the other hand, do not believe that the 14th amendment be interpreted in such a way that only the children of legal immigrants be granted citizenship due to multiple reasons.
The United States has been filled with great cheer and delight since the Platt Amendment has been passed on the country Cuba. The U.S amending the constitution creating the Platt Amendment, further maintained our power on Cuban independence. Senator Orville Platt from Connecticut made this amendment to intervene with a inadequate Cuban government. That 's why I stand for America to stay in Cuba and agree with the Platt Amendment . The Platt Amendment states that the government of Cuba could never enter a treaty jeopardizing their independence, which maintains our power over their military-government actions.
African Americans never had freedom in the past, as they were treated poorly. White people discriminated black people back then just because they weren’t the same skin color or came from the same origin. “Set free by the 13th amendment, with citizenship guaranteed by the 14th amendment, black males were given the vote by the 15th amendment. From that point on, the freedmen were generally expected to fend for themselves. In retrospect, it can be seen that the 15th amendment was in reality only the beginning of a struggle for equality that would continue for more than a century before African Americans could begin to participate fully in American public and civic life.
The 15th Amendment (Amendment XV), which gave African-American men the right to vote, was inserted into the U.S. Constitution on March 30, 1870. Passed by Congress the year before, the amendment says, “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.” Although the amendment was passed in the late 1870s, many racist practices were used to oppose African-Americans from voting, especially in the Southern States like Georgia and Alabama. After many years of racism, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 aimed to overthrow legal barricades at the state and local levels that deny African-Americans their right to vote. In the
The given source proposes initiative measure No.594 regarding background checks for sales and transfer of guns. Initiative measure No.594 consists of three main part with its subparts. It includes: explanatory statement proclaiming the current law regarding gun distribution and its foreseen consequences that will apply to the current law if the measure is approved; fiscal impact statement including general assumptions, state revenue assumptions, state revenues, state expenditure assumptions, state expenditures, local government revenue assumptions, local government revenues, local government expenditure assumptions, local government expenditures; arguments against and arguments for measure No.594 coming into force. The main controversy of the document is a wobbly balance between a
It affects the health of the human beings and also the environment. Despite having all these negative effects, tobacco is of great economic importance as it creates employment for the citizens. The negative effects of tobacco smoking supersede its positive contributions. Therefore, tobacco smoking should be banned. .
General Purpose: to persuade Specific Purpose: to persuade the audience of the importance of banning smoking in public places Thesis: Smoking should be banned in public places because it is harmful to non-smokers who visit public places. I. Introduction A. Attention-getter: How many of you been around people who are smoking in public places? Probably, most of us have at least noticed people smoking in CMU campus even it is a non-smoking campus. Secondhand smoke is really harmful to anyone who inhales it in.