The increase in the number of guns that people bought for self-defense is probably due to a lower level of confidence in social security and the strong sense of self preservation. This phenomenon suggest that the mass shooting events has had a bad effect on the survivors mental health and even made them feel frightened after hearing such news. Actually, many people think that if many people have the guns and these people who have guns are surrounding with them, they may be worried about some bad things happen (Hemenway 1995). If the government decide to control guns more strictly, this decision might directly reduce the chances of the mass shooting issues because gun is the only tool for shooting. Since the mass shooting issues is hopefully
Recent events leading to the deaths of many American citizens are likely enough for people to strive for the addition of stricter gun control, although such action may really be meaningless and infringe upon the core rights established by the country’s founders themselves. American citizens are currently armed with privately-owned guns to protect their freedom. If used properly, private gun ownership is beneficial to those who want to feel safer personally owning firearms. This stance portrays the fact that some values of gun control may help such as more extensive background checks, but ultimately it is a futile attempt that will lead to a minimal affect on modern society. In theory, the abolishment of guns would not have an effect on the levels of gun-related violence as gun control laws do not deter crime; the improper use of guns and firearms falling into the hands of the mentally-ill and unstable deters crime.
They say that if guns are taken away than it will stop mass shootings. This is wrong however because the guns criminals use most of the time are bought illegally or bought by someone else and given to them. They also may say that the background check needs to be more through. But even if they change the background checks and make them better, these people have been thinking this over and are probably going to be able to get past without being noticed. Since there is no real middle ground than they say that guns should just be taken away for good.
Boyd states that people all over the world need to understand the damage guns may have on our society and they can be used for good, but they can also be used for evil. For instance, Boyd shows that guns may be used for protection or just for shooting at a range, however people with wicked, deceived ways can find ways to inflict possible damage to our culture and nation. Neil Boyd also explains how the younger generation can be affected due to their exposure for possible weaponry due to the immaturity of the youth in our culture the chances and percentage of harm due to guns may possibly increase. Moreover, Gary Cleck wrote an article titled “Why do people support gun control?” in which he also explains society’s view on gun control that is mostly positive in supporting gun control. Cleck uses broad data to explain why people support gun control and how gun control actually benefits the society as a whole.
Increasing police presence in the neighborhoods with the highest rates of gun violence will help reduce gun related crimes. Having more officers on the street is an effective way deter criminals. For example, people are more likely to not commit crimes if they see many officers on the street. In addition, if more police officers are available then their response time will decrease. Furthermore, the police assigned to these troubled neighborhoods should practice community policing in order to gain the trust of and work together with its
These debates emphasize the need to strengthen the gun control laws that are currently in place, which are meant to regulate the buying, selling, and owning of gun. Lastly, even though gun control goes against the right given to individuals by the second amendment, having stricter gun control laws is beneficial for the safety of the nation because gun control can significantly decrease the number of deaths that occur because of mass shootings and gun control
There are many opposing views pertaining to this argument, but if everyone was just able to come to an agreement; the world would be a better place. Accordingly, carrying a concealed firearm shows time and time again to reduce crime. If you were trying to rob someone and they had a concealed weapon you would be in for a huge surprise, so it kind of acts
Police officers should be well equipped and have the best resources to combat crime. However, the defense equippements given by the state to the police officers should be aligned to the risks that they will face during their work routine. In this vein, not every police officer should carry all sorts of weapon, depending on the cirscumstances of their work, some would have to use weapons that are more or less lethal. Firstly, if every police officer carries a gun in every situation the risk for society can be greater than the benefits. Having more guns circulating in cities would increase chances for silly fights or disputes ending tragically increases exponentially.
These are all possible questions that people should consider and realise before buying these weapons. Actually if the number of people with handguns should be reduced and also the complexity with illegal gun trafficking will be reduced too, the rate of gun violence will be extremely
According to James Steinberg, a major portion of the problem is coming from the fact that gun control is a major issue in the United States. You would think that a weapon as deadly as an AR-15 would not be so easily obtainable by average US Americans but here we are, letting people with a history of domestic violence get ahold of them. When the weapons get into the hands of destructive monsters such as Nikolas Cruz and Adam Lanza, they hold responsibility for the actions that they choose to commit, even if it puts the people around them that risk. The correlation
As the ideal utilitarian approach focuses on the concept that the good will outweigh the bad, the good through gun control is easily identified through the way it will reduce the amount of violence as the restrictions of guns will reduce casualties. This has become the fundamental argument for the proponent camp where it is also seen how proponents argue the fact that “guns kill people” following cases of gun violence. As seen in the example of the cases that are ongoing in Baltimore, Maryland and Compton, California, these represents the clear fact that gun control is needed. The society will be a better place and it will be in the interest of the overall society for gun control to be needed. The clear advantages and good will be shown through the reduction of gun violence.