Palladio And Le Corbusier Analysis

What Different Work Have to tell us about the Origin of System of Thought: A close Analogy between Palladio & Le Corbusier Architecture, like other arts and sciences, were shaped by environmental factors that defined and influenced the contribution of architects and their system of thought. Many scholars have studied different schools of architecture and looked up for the similarities, origins, influences, evolvement and differences. Every school of architecture has had its own characteristics that rhymed with the historical era and factors that shaped its outcome. Renaissance era has held a revolutionary approach on most of the arts and sciences; it led to great outcomes that are still cherished until now. When compared to other eras,

Palladio and Le Corbusier have similarities and differences. They had totally different spatial composition whereas similar views on proportion. Palladio used spatial composition that had spacious halls and entrances. He focused on these elements to function as spaces for meetings or public events. His composition of rooms was also different from Le Corbusier where he sought to find symmetry between numbers of rooms and to use a structure of grand walls. Le Corbusier followed a more focused and simpler doctrine which included certain procedure: to classify, to dimension, to circulate, to compose and to proportion. This system of thought was drafted to simplify the process of planning and to focus on the functions of spatial composition. Le Corbusier is very concerned about every space in the house and how it is used. His spatial composition focuses on creating small apartments for every member living in the house where halls and entrances were brief and acted as mere connecters between cells. Structure was simple when compared to the grand walls and structure of Palladio. In terms of proportion, the two architects were quite similar. Both considered proportion in architecture as the harmonious relation between arithmetic geometric relations which produced beauty and simplicity. They also considered light as a fundamental base of their architecture. The reason why these similarities and differences have grown to show was mainly due to the difference in the historical era that each architect lived in. Le Corbusier was part of the modern architecture and an urban planner whereas Palladio was a renaissance architecture of a flourishing economic period. Thus, Le Corbusier sought efficiency and disdained wastefulness whereas Palladio’s sought to portray rank and glory in is architecture. The two architects produced different systems of thought; Le Corbusier was a pillar