In his Germania, Tacitus describes the lands and peoples of Germany. He sometimes praises them, sometimes derides them, but often he writes with an air of casual indifference. Since Tacitus was a Roman, and he wrote the Germania for other Romans, the reader can get a glimpse of Roman society at the time through analysis of Tacitus’s word choice and tone. While Tacitus covers many facets of Germanic culture, he particularly highlights their customs in battle and rather ethical domestic lifestyle, while disparaging their seemingly inherent lazy nature and tendency to fall into drunkenness. In this, the reader learns what values the Romans of the day - or at least Tacitus himself - held in high esteem. Tacitus spends a significant amount of time, including parts of chapters 3, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13, and 14, on the Germanic peoples’ tendency for war. In these chapters, Tacitus discusses their battle tactics, the role of women ( “they do not despise their counsels, or make light of their answers”), and honor. Tacitus admires them for their courage and system of honor (“The chief fights for victory; his vassals fight for their chief”), and could perhaps have meant these chapters as a warning and challenge to the Romans: The Germans are fierce and dangerous, and we must match their valor to …show more content…
He says, in chapter 18, that “no part of their manners is more praiseworthy”. Tacitus praises their strict marriage code, mentioning the tight bond between man and wife, who are “one body and one life”. He also esteems the low amount of adultery in Germania, commending them for being “uncorrupted by allurements” and for avoiding “clandestine correspondence”. These matrimonial values seem to be Tacitus’s ideal for Roman society, and the reader infers that he is admonishing the aristocracy Germania is written for, who are most likely “corrupted” and who make much use of “clandestine
This quote explains how the Germans did not see the value and importance in the resource, amber. This also proves that the Romans saw themselves as superior to the Germans as Tacitus actually calls the Germanic tribes barbaric. The Germans were also criticized for their religious practices of sacrificing a man as a religious holiday at a certain time of the year and torturing him (Germania 13). I agree that this holiday is barbaric and innocuous, but this is specifically highlighted as a barbaric practice, and the ancient Romans also had some practices that definitely seem to be barbaric, such as public executions of criminals.
This is different from the Roman structure in that the emperor had complete power, and the senate held power over everyone else because of their financial status. Although the citizens of Rome could elect their officials and consuls, not everyone was considered a citizen unlike the tribespeople of Rhineland. In particular, women had an immensely higher status and role in Germanic society, starting with the fact that they were considered “citizens”. In the eyes of the men, their mothers and wives were the “most sacred witnesses of his bravery”, and were the healers and caregivers of them all6.
Sextus Tarquinius is he that last night returned hostility for hospitality, and brought ruin on me, and on himself no less, if you are men, when he worked his pleasure with me"' (Tivy, "The Rape of Lucretia, p. 302). Lucretia was a victim but decided death would find itself a better opportunity than life because she felt that she had not dishonored only herself but her family. These lines directly demonstrate how much of Roman women's value had become placed on whether a woman kept her honor by remaining chaste and modest, even in cases of sexual
Tacitus, a historian living during time of the 5 Good Emperors possesses a balanced view on the Germanic people, however in the 4th Century, as a historian, Marcellinus views them as savage barbarians, finally in the 5th Century, Priscus, a diplomatic envoy, views the Germanic people as civilized. Although he was “delighted by gifts from neighboring tribes”, Tacitus also thought them to be barbarians after he experiences that “they wear skins of wild beasts.” Considering the peaceful and flourishing time period that Tacitus lives in, he lacks any natural reasons to fear the Germanic people, eventually he comes to the conclusion that these “barbarians” are quite civilized. Around the 4th century when the Huns actively attack the Western Roman Empire, the historian Marcellinus states that the Huns along with the Germanic tribes have “no home or law or settled manner” and he views them to be “quite abnormally savage.” The rather un-forgiving vibe Marcellinus puts off is due to the stressful, desperate, and instable time period that he writes in, ultimately viewing them as ruthless barbarians.
The Romans emerged from Italy and formed their culture that can find its roots among an array of native tribes and Greek colonies that populated Italy. There are two parts of the foundation of a Roman’s identity that stemmed from the cultural influences that produced the Romans, their culture and their ideals. The first component of the foundation of the Roman identity is the usage and the incorporation of others’ myths into their own etiological myth. The second part stems from these myths that made the Romans believe that their existence and success was the result of fate. By looking into Virgil’s Aeneid and Sallust’s Conspiracy of Catiline one can see that this two-part foundation produced a society and people that embodied this idea that they were the best parts of all the cultures
The book by Peter H. Wilson explores the time of the Holly Roman Empire through the prism of the social, cultural and political events, which shaped its legacy. Moreover, it informs the reader about the development, structure and the significance of the Empire in its last centuries, by thoroughly revising the history, updating and expanding the gathered information. Wilson is a professor at the University of Hull, a well-established specialist in early modern German history, with a particular interest in the Holy Roman Empire between 1495 and 1806 and the impact of war and its impact in Europe. He presents an absorbing picture of those turbulent years and has acknowledged the key figures and themes that brought impact in the society and the political development of the countries within the Empire. The author tells us the story while deceiving all key events and shows us how they influenced the next generations, pointing out all political and diplomatic challenges the Holy Roman Empire faced, from its establishment all the way to its demise in 1806.
Often, human sacrifices were made to please Mercury. Suebians also made human sacrifices of Roman soldiers to Nerthus, Hercules and Mars, however, were more appeased with lawful offerings of animal sacrifices. In Germania, Publius Cornelious Tacitus analyzes the culture of the tribes in the region, in order to aid in the development of the Roman empire. Although he is writing about Germania in a way which makes it seem as though he favors their ways, the major purpose is to persuade the Roman empire into strengthening their culture through intimidation. Tacitus believed their barbaric style of warfare, loyalty to their chief, and views on marriage are desirable qualities to better
Madison McDonald Dr. Travis Montgomery ENGL 2213-02 16 March 2018 Violence in The Aeneid The Aeneid is bursting with violent acts from the beginning to the end. The main character, Aeneas, constantly faces conflict from both humans and gods. Aeneas is a Trojan hero and prince who embodies pietas, driven by duty, honor, and devotion, which makes him an example of an ideal Roman citizen. Aeneas was called by the gods and determined to be a successful founder of Rome, but he faced complications along the journey. In each conflict along the way, Aeneas dealt with fighting and violence and could not find peace until the end.
Introduction Rome was run under a monarchy for the first two centuries of its founding, having lasted through a total of seven kings. During this time, Rome grew into a successful metropolis with the adoption of Etruscan technology and culture which may be attributed to its many Etruscan kings. This monarchy would come to an end after the overthrowing of their last king, bringing about the birth of the Roman Republic. What circumstances led to the establishment of the Roman Republic? Rome was founded in 753 BCE and operated as a monarchy up until its last king, Lucius Tarquinius Superbus was overthrown.
In her chapter on the historiography of Roman exemplarity, Christina Shuttleworth Kraus examines this loss of power through the transition of exempla as the res gestae populi Romani to the res gestae divi Augusti (Kraus, 2). In early Roman history, exemplarity rested in the hands of popular consciousness; the citizens of Rome had the sole power of deciding which events or people to raise up to the status of exempla. This system of exemplarity that is explained in detail by Matthew Roller’s four stage model of the creation of exempla by public discourse (Roller, 216-217). However, Roller’s framework begins to collapse when Augustus intentionally influences exemplary power through his coercive Res Gestae. Rather than looking to the past for the great deeds of common people like the Sabine women or Lucretia, Roman citizens of the Augustan period had their attention directed towards the persona of one man, an exemplar in the form of an emperor.
The Life of Marius, written by Plutarch, is a fascinating ancient source detailing the career of the Roman Gaius Marius, 127-86BC. While there are interpretive and reliability issues, the Life of Marius is a particularly useful and significant source. It is our only extensive primary source on Marius, who was a key political figure of late Republican Rome. Additionally, Plutarch’s work indicates not only many crucial military and political development in Rome in the time period, but also gives a reflection of Plutarch’s own Rome and its values and political climate.
The virtue of piety was a defining characteristic in Roman life, Romans carried out their everyday lives in accordance of the ideas of pietas which is one’s duty to their family, God, and people; these Roman values are displayed in Virgil’s The Aeneid through the actions of the character Aeneas, and challenged further in the Gospel of Matthew by Jesus Christ. The word “pietas” is a Latin word that means dutifulness, and refers to the balanced duty to a person’s family, gods, and people in Roman culture. The Romans believed that for these duties to be upheld then it must be implemented in one’s everyday life, and this belief of the Romans separated them from other ancient societies. In The Aeneid, Aeneas engages in all aspects of pietas throughout his journey to Italy to become the ancestor to the city of Rome.
In William Shakespeare’s Henry V, the character of King Henry delivers some powerful verbiage, known as St. Crispin’s Day Speech, to his troops in order to rally the men for battle. In this speech, King Henry chooses to invoke themes such as glory, religion, and comradery to make the battle they are about to fight immortal in the soldiers’ minds and to motivate them to fight together. These themes draw similar emotions in all men, no matter their background; all men have the need for honour, the urge to please the deity they believe in, and the need to trust in their fellow men. Every man wants his story to be remembered.
In Ancient Rome, sexual power was central to everything. From the traditional moral codes to the drama of the fights for political power, sexuality and acceptable behaviors were a constant. The societal systems in place required female sexuality to be monitored and controlled because of the Roman drive to expand an individual’s, a family’s or the empire’s influence as much as possible in all arenas. For much of the Roman Empire, this drive for influence was accomplished through making connections between families, either formally through marriage or informally through affairs. Sexuality was part of everyday life, since children and the question of inheritance both of property and of power were of the upmost importance.
”This quote highlights the arrogance and warlike nature the Romans developed, and the paradigm shift that the Roman Empire endured culminating from “Pax