In her book ‘Beyond Honor’, a feminist and a cultural critic, Tahira Khan, argues that acceptability of Panchayat practices is due to the widely held notion of shame/honor scheme in South Asia where female servitude enhances the male honor. Any act committed by woman that damages the male honor and supremacy, is unforgivable. This concept is so entrenched in the social fabric of our society that once a girl is declared Kari (impure) by the Panchayat, so they are deemed a legitimate sacrifice to restore honor (UNICEF, July 2007). In such a social milieu, a woman’s life, let alone her happiness, has little worth. Lewis (1994) recounts that in Pakistan, gender interactions boils down to two perceptions; that female is subordinate to the male members …show more content…
Pakistan’s patriarchal society repeatedly condones discrimination against women mostly amongst the poor and uneducated rural families, says Dr. Farzana Bari, the Director of Gender Studies at Quaid-e-Azam University. She further elaborates that this mindset influence the police and judiciary; causing them to turn a blind eye to honor killings. According to her, "honor killings are a symptom of vigilante justice that occurs in an environment where the state is unable to enforce its writ." Pakistan is ranked among the most dangerous and unsafe countries for women after Afghanistan and the Democratic Republic of Congo according to a survey conducted by Thomson Reuters in 2011; mainly because of the prevalent cultural, tribal and religious customs that are harmful to women. Nearly 100 women and girls become the victim of honor killing mostly resulted from orders from panchayat (HRCP). An average of 300 women annually have been known to suffer from ‘Karo Kari’ the gang rape order by the panchayat system in Pakistan’s feudally dominated interior areas …show more content…
The case of Muktaran Mai, who was ordered to gang rape and later was forced to walk half naked through the crowd was a vicious act vowed upon eye for an eye principal (NY Times, 2002). Mukhtaran statement that, ‘They did not have to use weapons to kill her, rape killed her’ identifies the intensity of the torture. Mukataran Mai took her case to the courts despite the constant threats from the complainant, where the justice was delayed and denied, acquitting five of the six accused in the rape case. Delays and the denial of justice in such cases generate trust deficit between people and official justice system and highlights a structural failing of the criminal justice system, according to Ali Dayan Hasan, a senior researcher at Human Rights Watch 's South Asia division. The outcome also represents the misogyny of Pakistan 's judicial system as it is impulsively unsympathetic to women. Moreover, a girl named Maria committed suicide after being ordered by the Panchayat to be raped in revenge for her father’s attempt to rape a minor. These cases unfold that under the cloak of justice and local customs, women, and children are treated as a tool of compensation. This form of structural violence has got passive acceptance among marginalized groups. However, these cases resulted in huge outcry by the women and human right activists resulting in parliament passing
The court got the idea that Adnan is just like other Pakistani Muslim men, that he had connections and can get away with murder. Another piece of information is,”in some cultures women are second class citizens… He just wanted power and she wouldn't give it”(223). These stereotypes are being used against Adnan and make him look like a typical Muslim who abused females. Yet his classmates never said he had acted that way toward anyone.
“On July 30, 1992, an innocent person was convicted of a heinous crime”. Guy Paul Morin, an ordinary man, was arrested, imprisoned and convicted of first degree murder. The victim was Christine Jessop, a nine-year-old girl from Ontario, Canada. She was found murdered in a field about fifty kilometres from where she lived. Due to the investigation team’s carelessness and tunnel vision, the systematic failure of the justice system, and the poor handling of evidence by the crown there was not only one, but two victims in this case.
The cases get more hype as media reports cover them and present them as “cases of the century”. Thus it is the collective society responsibility to secure and safeguard women
People are issued out.’ …, The issue isn’t what we want to write about. Everybody knows an injustice was done. How many know what actually went on inside?” (Foreword, Farewell to Manzanar).
To further explain, in the Girl Rising documentary, viewers are taken through the life of a young girl, Suma, in Nepal. She was only six-years-old when her parents exchanged her obedient working hand for money. She was then sent to a home where she would do chores such as washing the dishes, cut firewood and maintain the farm. At her next working home, Suma’s employer’s forced her to eat their scraps, and called her “unlucky girl”. At this home, she was sexually abused, but she did not let that define her.
Guilty or not? The fate of Genghis Khan lay in the hands of the people. Both the prosecution and defense had compelling arguments on the leadership of Khan. The first person that made a compelling argument from the prosecution side was philosopher Ibn al Athir, which was portrayed by Dylan. The testimony of the Ibn al Athir touched on the ethical response to the mass killing and religious tolerance during Khan’s rule.
Literary Analysis Essay “ And you have seen men in uniform drive-by and murder Tamir Rice, a twelve-year-old whom they were oath-bound to protect. ”(Coates 9).
Victims, Victimization and Victimology: A Socio-Legal Study Dr. (Mrs.) Ravidankaur R. Karnani Assist. Professor & I/c. Principal, Law College, Palanpur karnani_ravidan@yahoo.com, 7990980278 Abstract For many decades, the victim was the forgotten party in the criminal justice system as the main focus was that the perpetrator of a crime should be punished. But the victims of crimes stand poised equally in the scales of justice as the victim is not a passive object but an active component of the whole judicial process.
The family’s girl may also become a victim as critics will increase towards this girl’s honor. In addition, if the woman choose to have this child; at some points in her life, it will remind her of the event when she got raped which will bring her bad memories and create a long lasting trauma. Rape of woman takes place in many countries, a woman who is coming back home from a long night in dangerous
Their needs and desires are ignored and are considered less important than men. When the Talibans came, men’s needs are prioritized while women are left behind. According to Hosseini (2007), “ Women are forbidden from working”(p.298). This shows that men are given the privilege to go to work and earn money to support their families and themselves while girls are debarred from getting a job whether they like it or not as the Talibans think that women are of the weaker sex and are not capable of doing anything that helps contribute to the society. One evidence, according to Hosseini (2007), “ “Go to Rabia Balkhi,” the guard said.
Sexual assault laws have been amended and created over time to ensure the criminal justice system remains sensitive to the tribulations involved in rape trials for the victim. However, the connotative capacity of language used in evidentiary testimonies in rape trials can defeat the purpose of these reforms as ‘language is not merely a means of putting forth evidence in a case, but it in fact transforms the nature of evidence itself, thus influencing the outcome of the case’ (Maheshwari 2014:1). As theorised by Bourdieu (1982) symbolic power as ‘the power to create reality through language’ (Matoesian 1995:38) is successfully employed in rape trials to instil patriarchal and legal domination over the victim. The use of language in courtroom
This highlights the importance of how these acts of cruelty Mariam and Laila faced; ‘fear of the goat, released in the tiger’s cage’ is what ultimately defines their inner feminist strength, ‘over the years/learned to harden’ which shows that Mariam and Laila’s past indirectly prepares them for The Taliban’s arrival. The Taliban take away the basic rights of Mariam and Laila ‘jewellery is forbidden’, but they fail to do so. Ironically, it is the society itself that gives them the strength and platform to strike back against Rasheed, who is a cruel, male-dominating character who symbolised and reinforced everything the term ‘anti-feminist’ stands
In Justice, Gender, and the Family, Susan Moller Okin presents a critique of modern theories of justice. She claims that these theorists make fatal assumptions regarding justice in the family. For example, she claims that John Rawls assumes that a family is inherently just and fails to consider how gender fits into the original position and veil of ignorance. He neglects the difference of opportunity in the family and the way that gender has a role as the primary school for justice. Okin believes that women must be included to create a satisfactory theory of justice that remedies the modern inequalities that we still see in families today.
“This is what my soul is telling me: be peaceful and love everyone.” -Malala Yousafzai. You know what? Malala is doing exactly that.
According to the famous sociologists Sylvia Walby, patriarchy is “a system of social structure and practices in which men dominate, oppress and exploit women”. Women’s exploitation is an age old cultural phenomenon of Indian society. The system of patriarchy finds its validity and sanction in our religious beliefs, whether it is Hindu, Muslim or any other religion. For instance, as per ancient Hindu law giver Manu, “Women are supposed to be in the custody of their father when they are children, they must be under the custody of their husband when married and under the custody of her son in old age or as widows.