ipl-logo

Tardif Vs Wiebe Case Summary

678 Words3 Pages

Throughout the case of Tardif vs Wiebe the concepts of liability are explored. Both in which situation it arises and the consequence that go along with it when a business is held responsible. The case study provides an excellent example of liability.

Vicarious liability is explained as when an “employer is liable for the injuries caused by employees during their employment” (Yates, R.A., 2016). This idea brings the question of whether the liability businesses are held to is too much. In my opinion I think the approach vicarious liability takes is fair and reasonable. An employer is responsible for insuring employees know the roles of their jobs and how to conduct themselves accordingly. If an indecent happens with the employees involving other employees or customers, …show more content…

I believe a business should be held responsible for employee’s improper actions when they have not been given the information to know it was wrong, such as in the Tardif vs Wiebe case. As the case makes it clear Wiebe was not an experienced bouncer nor was he informed of the parameters of the job and what the expectations of proper conduct were (Tardif v Wiebe, 1996, pg 4). Even though it was Poburn, a friend of the defendant Wiebe, who hired him (Tardif v Wiebe, 1996, pg.4), it was still the hotels duty to make sure that Wiebe was given these proper instructions of conduct. If an employee is responsible for wrongful actions after he has already been told of what is acceptable and knows the severity of the consequence these actions will lead to, it is not the businesses job to be held liable. The business has already taken the right steps to inform the employee and cannot do anymore to ensure they follow the instructions. While I believe the amount of liability vicarious liability holds a business to is reasonable, I do not believe that the employer is always at fault for their employee’s actions and should be held

Show More
Related

  • R. V. Saulte Ste Case Study

    1403 Words  | 6 Pages

    Strict liability strikes a good balance between the regulatory offences and the principle that the morally blameworthy may be punished by having to prove that the prohibited act was done beyond a reasonable doubt. Negligence is presumed, unless the defence establishes a defence of

    Read More

  • Turner V Hershey Chocolate Usa Case Study

    1048 Words  | 5 Pages

    While employed at the Hershey Chocolate USA, Turners claims have been reasonable essential accommodation on the defendant. In this case, the observing the material facts in the light most positive to the Turner, It is difficult to determine the matter of the law based on the evidence that appellant directly intimidate to its employees or place an undue hardship on the defendant, Therefore, the question whether plaintiff’s can perform the important function of her position with reasonable accommodation is an undefended material fact for the trial. Hershey will have a chance at trial to reverse Turner ’s claim by presenting that her proposed accommodation would make in danger the health safety of its employees as a result, an employer is not wanted to provide accommodations to an employee.

    Read More

  • Turner V Hershey Chocolate Case Analysis

    955 Words  | 4 Pages

    While employed at the Hershey Chocolate USA, Turners claims have been essential accommodation on defendant. In this case the looking the material facts in the light most favorable to the Turner, it is difficult to conclude the material of the law, based on the evidence that Turners directly threaten to its employees or place an “Undue hardship” on Hershey. Therefore, the question whether Turners can perform the essential function of her position with reasonable accommodation is an open material fact for trial. Hershey will have a opportunities at trial to defeat Turners claim by presenting that her proposed accommodation would make vulnerable the health safety of its employees therefore an employer is not requires to accommodate an employee. Moreover, it would carry out an undue hardship that even with the accommodation.

    Read More

  • Causes And Prevention Of The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

    473 Words  | 2 Pages

    The owners are to blame for the deaths of the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire because they promoted an unsafe working environment, also, never cared about the employees' health, and only made money for themselves. The owners, Max and Issac, did not care for their workers' safety. To start, Max Blanck and Issac Harris promoted an unsafe environment. For example, the “employers often locked doors” (Marrin 7). The employers and people in charge of the factory and company were not prepared.

    Read More

  • Essay On Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

    1292 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire was an influential event in American history that caused workers and business owners all of the country to revisit their work-related regulations. Many dangers that occurred as a result of the factory owners’ actions caused the tragedy to be more harmful than necessary. Other preventable mistakes made by the firemen and their equipment added to the tragic nature of this event. America has learned that factories and businesses need safer rules and work environments to protect their employees. Because of this tragic event in the nation’s history, the government passed an abundance of laws to support the safety of workers and their work conditions.

    Read More

  • Human Resource: Case 20.3 In Employment Law

    118 Words  | 1 Pages

    Resource: Case 20.3 in Employment Law, Chapter 20. Write a 700- to 1,050-word executive summary in Microsoft ® Word in the third person voice in which you analyze the case by addressing the following: Defend against or support the position of the plaintiff. Discuss if the plaintiff's injury was caused due to her own negligence or the defendant's negligence. As the Human Resources Director, recommend an ethical resolution to this case to the legal department and senior management.

    Read More

  • Summary: The Injury Of Employee Simulation

    622 Words  | 3 Pages

    However, the employer is still responsible for the job-related injury of a private contacotr. However, it is worth noting that the laws surroduning reciieinvg fincial compensation for a work related injury as a privat econtracotr, varies from state to state. Complexity Surrouding Work Related IInjury

    Read More

  • R. Williams Construction Co. V. OSHRC: Case Study

    736 Words  | 3 Pages

    Even though working conditions are the responsibility of the employer, it is the job of the employee to practice and implement safe working practices. In order to determine if the company is responsible, a complete report including the employee’s actions should be considered. The incident could just be an outcome of employees not practicing safe working procedures. Whether the penalties are sufficient, that would depend on the outcome of a complete investigation of the

    Read More

  • A Case Study Of Seaworld Of Florida Vs. Perez

    1071 Words  | 5 Pages

    Introduction This case study of SeaWorld of Florida v. Perez is a case where the safety protocols set by SeaWorld were set up to keep trainers safe. However, it could also show that they were put into place due to the violent nature of the killer whales therefore showing that SeaWorld knew the dangers trainer Brancheau would be facing on a daily basis. This case was about the legal issues enforced by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and how the plaintiff established a valid violation under the General Duty Clause of the OSH Act. Additionally it will explain how the elements of a valid claim were satisfied under the OSH Act as well as understanding how OSHA enforces workplace safety and health standards.

    Read More

  • Is Dick Liable For Bill's Death Essay

    698 Words  | 3 Pages

    Both Herbert’s supervisor and the company’s president should be held vicariously liable for Missy’s death. However, to answer why they would be liable the term vicarious liability must be defined for understanding. This form of liability is defined as “liability or accountability of one person for the act of another” (Chamelin & Thomas, 2012, p. 49). In this case, it is the lack of employer negligence and negligent supervision that would cause for both the supervisor and company president to be liable for this young girl’s death.

    Read More

  • Civil Rights Act Of 1964 Essay

    1584 Words  | 7 Pages

    If an employee harms someone who is hired by "negligent hiring", which is when an employer doesn't take careful consideration into who he is hiring, or by "negligent retention", which is when an employer keeps a dangerous employee, then the employer is held liable for that

    Read More

  • Case Study Of Cite: Kavangh V Trustees Of Boston University

    490 Words  | 2 Pages

    A player on a Rugby team had extended his arm during a tackle which caused the opponent to break his jaw. The judge ruled that the club is responsible due to vicarious liability in having players carry out actions on demand of the club. The player’s action was revealed to be part of a strategy to get rid of one of the three players on the opposing team that would make the game difficult for them to win. This case is different in ruling due to the fact that the players are under a payed contract as an employee to play the

    Read More

  • Sexual Harassment Ethics

    1289 Words  | 6 Pages

    The reasoning behind it is to motivate employers and mangers to establish a zero tolerance policy. Managers or board members should take each complaint seriously and set good examples for other employees. Since employers are at liability in cases like this, they must act immediately and investigate complaints. Employers cannot

    Read More

  • Role Of Stakeholders In Aviation

    963 Words  | 4 Pages

    A company 's customers are entitled to fair trading practices but they are not entitled to the same consideration as the company 's employees. Stakeholders around the hotel: 3.1. Local governmentThe decisions of government, inevitably affect different groups within society. Increasingly, the government are

    Read More

  • Vicarious Liability Analysis

    1238 Words  | 5 Pages

    INTRODUCTION TO VICARIOUS LIABILITY The misconduct doctrine that imposes responsibility upon one person for the failure of another, with whom the person incorporates a special relationship (such as Parent and child, employer and employee, or owner of vehicle and driver), to exercise such care as a fairly prudent person would use underneath similar circumstances. Vicarious liability could be a legal belief that assigns liability for an injury to someone who failed to cause the injury however who incorporates a specific legal relationship to the one who did act negligently. It’s conjointly spoken as imputed Negligence. Legal relationships that may cause imputed negligence embrace the connection between parent and child, Husband and wife, owner of a vehicle and driver, and employer and employee.

    Read More

More about Tardif Vs Wiebe Case Summary

Open Document